Department for Biomechanics and Sportbiology, Institute of Sport and Movement Science, University Stuttgart, Allmandring 28 A, Vaihingen, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 11;19(16):9920. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19169920.
Even though chronic knee pain is common in volleyball, neuromuscular imbalance as a potential risk factor has not been investigated in volleyball-specific tasks. The aim of the study was to compare neuromuscular control between healthy and injured players in a clinical jump test and a volleyball-specific jump task in real field conditions.
Six athletes with knee pain and nine controls were included. Surface electromyographic data were recorded from the mm. vastus medialis (VM) and lateralis (VL) of both legs. VM/VL activation ratio was calculated from countermovement jump (CMJ) and volleyball spike indoors and on two beach surfaces.
All subjects had pain in the leading leg. Mann-Whitney U Test (M-W-U Test) revealed a significantly lower VM/VL ratio of the leading leg (always affected) of the injured compared with that of the healthy control group for the CMJ and spike jump on all three grounds. Bland-Altman analysis revealed low bias and low difference in standard deviation for the injured leg but high values for the uninvolved leg and healthy controls between tasks and grounds. These results could indicate that neuromuscular control might not adapt too well to different movement tasks and grounds in the injured leg.
Athletes with chronic knee pain might have lower VM/VL ratios than controls independent from movement task and ground. Neuromuscular control in injured athletes might be less adaptable to new circumstances. The results of neuromuscular control in laboratory settings might be applicable to field conditions in injured legs but not healthy ones.
尽管慢性膝关节疼痛在排球中很常见,但神经肌肉失衡作为一个潜在的危险因素,尚未在排球专项任务中进行研究。本研究的目的是在临床跳跃测试和真实场地条件下的排球专项跳跃任务中比较健康和受伤运动员的神经肌肉控制。
纳入 6 名膝关节疼痛运动员和 9 名对照组。从双侧股直肌(VM)和股外侧肌(VL)记录表面肌电图数据。从反跳跳(CMJ)和室内排球扣球以及在两个沙滩表面计算 VM/VL 激活比。
所有受试者的主导腿都有疼痛。曼-惠特尼 U 检验(M-W-U 检验)显示,受伤组的主导腿(始终受影响)的 VM/VL 比值在 CMJ 和沙滩排球扣球测试中均明显低于健康对照组。Bland-Altman 分析显示,受伤腿的任务和场地之间的偏差和标准差差异较小,但未受伤腿和健康对照组的偏差和标准差差异较大。这些结果表明,神经肌肉控制可能无法很好地适应受伤腿的不同运动任务和场地。
慢性膝关节疼痛的运动员的 VM/VL 比值可能低于对照组,与运动任务和场地无关。受伤运动员的神经肌肉控制可能适应性较差。实验室环境中神经肌肉控制的结果可能适用于受伤腿的场地条件,但不适用于健康腿。