Petrigna Luca, Karsten Bettina, Marcolin Giuseppe, Paoli Antonio, D'Antona Giuseppe, Palma Antonio, Bianco Antonino
Ph.D. Program in Health Promotion and Cognitive Sciences, Department of Psychology, Educational Science and Human Movement, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Department of Exercise and Sport Science, LUNEX International University of Health, Exercise and Sports, Differdange, Luxembourg.
Front Physiol. 2019 Nov 7;10:1384. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.01384. eCollection 2019.
In the context of a public health physical fitness (PF) examination in adolescence, a countermovement jump (CMJ) and a squat jump (SJ) are two vertical jump (VJ) tests widely used to evaluate lower limb muscle strength and power, respectively. The main criticism of both the CMJ and SJ test is the lack of test standardization. Therefore, the objectives of this review are: (a) to gather information about both jumps; (b) to investigate whether it is possible to identify common procedures referred to in the CMJ and SJ technical execution, and (c) to design standard operating procedures (SOPs) to promote CMJ and SJ standardization in an adolescent population aged 12-18 years.
The review partially adopted the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Statement (PRISMA). Due to growing attention in monitoring physical health through field tests in recent years, articles were collected using the PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases from January 2009 to July 2019. Original articles in which CMJ or SJ were used to assess the muscular strength in adolescents were eligible for further analysis. Articles written in English was imposed as a limit.
A total of 117 studies met the inclusion criteria. The description of the CMJ and SJ test procedures was different within the literature, with discrepancies in the jump technique, number of jumps, and measurement devices used.
A lack of method standardization for both the CMJ and the SJ test was identified. Based on the literature, SOPs for both VJs were proposed. These are useful in the context of public health PF examination in adolescents, as they facilitate an unbiased comparison of jump performance data between published studies.
在青少年公共卫生体能（PF）检查中，反向纵跳（CMJ）和深蹲跳（SJ）是广泛用于分别评估下肢肌肉力量和爆发力的两种垂直跳（VJ）测试。CMJ和SJ测试的主要批评在于缺乏测试标准化。因此，本综述的目的是：（a）收集有关这两种跳跃的信息；（b）调查是否有可能确定CMJ和SJ技术执行中提到的通用程序，以及（c）设计标准操作程序（SOP）以促进12至18岁青少年群体中CMJ和SJ的标准化。
本综述部分采用系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目声明（PRISMA）。由于近年来通过现场测试监测身体健康受到越来越多的关注，于2009年1月至2019年7月使用PubMed、科学网和Scopus数据库收集文章。使用CMJ或SJ评估青少年肌肉力量的原始文章有资格进行进一步分析。限定文章语言为英文。
共有117项研究符合纳入标准。文献中CMJ和SJ测试程序的描述各不相同，在跳跃技术、跳跃次数和使用的测量设备方面存在差异。
确定CMJ和SJ测试均缺乏方法标准化。基于文献，提出了两种VJ的SOP。这些在青少年公共卫生PF检查中很有用，因为它们有助于对已发表研究之间的跳跃表现数据进行无偏比较。
