Suppr超能文献

新冠病毒相关肺曲霉病(CAPA)确诊患者的长期随访

Long-Term Follow-Up of Patients Diagnosed with COVID-19-Associated Pulmonary Aspergillosis (CAPA).

作者信息

Ruiz-Ruigómez María, Fernández-Ruiz Mario, Pérez-Ayala Ana, Aguado José María

机构信息

Unit of Infectious Diseases, Instituto de Investigación Hospital "12 de Octubre" (imas12), Hospital Universitario "12 de Octubre", CIBERINFEC, ISCIII, 28041 Madrid, Spain.

Department of Medicine, Universidad Complutense, Av. Séneca, 2, 28040 Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

J Fungi (Basel). 2022 Aug 11;8(8):840. doi: 10.3390/jof8080840.

Abstract

COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA) have been documented during the COVID-19 pandemic. The vast majority of these patients do not meet the classic EORTC/MSGERC criteria for invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. The question arises as to whether there may have been an over-diagnosis of this disease. Here we review our experience and analyze the evolution of 27 patients who were diagnosed with CAPA during hospital admission. Surviving patients were followed-up for a mean time of 15 months (SD 3.78) by a group of experts and clinical records of diseased patients were reviewed. After expert evaluation and follow-up, 10 patients were finally assumed as CAPA according to expert opinion. These cases represent 40% of the initially CAPA assumed cases. Our data suggest the need to reconsider actual diagnosis criteria for CAPA what could drive to better identification of these patients.

摘要

在新冠疫情期间,已记录到新冠病毒相关肺曲霉病(CAPA)。这些患者中的绝大多数不符合侵袭性肺曲霉病的经典欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织/欧洲医学真菌学联合会(EORTC/MSGERC)标准。由此产生了一个问题,即这种疾病是否可能存在过度诊断的情况。在此,我们回顾我们的经验,并分析27例在住院期间被诊断为CAPA的患者的病情演变。存活患者由一组专家进行了平均15个月(标准差3.78)的随访,并对患病患者的临床记录进行了回顾。经过专家评估和随访,根据专家意见,最终认定10例患者为CAPA。这些病例占最初认定为CAPA病例的40%。我们的数据表明,有必要重新考虑CAPA的实际诊断标准,这可能有助于更好地识别这些患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5b4/9409906/7a22302a6d2c/jof-08-00840-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验