• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用机器学习方法对造血系统恶性肿瘤患者的癫痫风险进行排名的应用。

Application of Machine Learning Methods for Epilepsy Risk Ranking in Patients with Hematopoietic Malignancies Using.

作者信息

Skiba Iaroslav, Kopanitsa Georgy, Metsker Oleg, Yanishevskiy Stanislav, Polushin Alexey

机构信息

Department of Chemotherapy and Stem Cell Transplantation for Cancer and Autoimmune Diseases, First Pavlov State Medical University of St. Peterburg, 197022 Saint Petersburg, Russia.

Almazov National Medical Research Centre, 197341 Saint Petersburg, Russia.

出版信息

J Pers Med. 2022 Aug 11;12(8):1306. doi: 10.3390/jpm12081306.

DOI:10.3390/jpm12081306
PMID:36013255
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9410112/
Abstract

Machine learning methods to predict the risk of epilepsy, including vascular epilepsy, in oncohematological patients are currently considered promising. These methods are used in research to predict pharmacoresistant epilepsy and surgical treatment outcomes in order to determine the epileptogenic zone and functional neural systems in patients with epilepsy, as well as to develop new approaches to classification and perform other tasks. This paper presents the results of applying machine learning to analyzing data and developing diagnostic models of epilepsy in oncohematological and cardiovascular patients. This study contributes to solving the problem of often unjustified diagnosis of primary epilepsy in patients with oncohematological or cardiovascular pathology, prescribing antiseizure drugs to patients with single seizure syndromes without finding a disease associated with these cases. We analyzed the hospital database of the V.A. Almazov Scientific Research Center of the Ministry of Health of Russia. The study included 66,723 treatment episodes of patients with vascular diseases (I10-I15, I61-I69, I20-I25) and 16,383 episodes with malignant neoplasms of lymphoid, hematopoietic, and related tissues (C81-C96 according to ICD-10) for the period from 2010 to 2020. Data analysis and model calculations indicate that the best result was shown by gradient boosting with mean accuracy cross-validation score = 0.96. f1-score = 98, weighted avg precision = 93, recall = 96, f1-score = 94. The highest correlation coefficient for G40 and different clinical conditions was achieved with fibrillation, hypertension, stenosis or occlusion of the precerebral arteries (0.16), cerebral sinus thrombosis (0.089), arterial hypertension (0.17), age (0.03), non-traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (0.07), atrial fibrillation (0.05), delta absolute neutrophil count (0.05), platelet count at discharge (0.04), transfusion volume for stem cell transplantation (0.023). From the clinical point of view, the identified differences in the importance of predictors in a broader patient model are consistent with a practical algorithm for organic brain damage. Atrial fibrillation is one of the leading factors in the development of both ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes. At the same time, brain infarction can be accompanied both by the development of epileptic seizures in the acute period and by unprovoked epileptic seizures and development of epilepsy in the early recovery and in a longer period. In addition, a microembolism of the left heart chambers can lead to multiple microfocal lesions of the brain, which is one of the pathogenetic aspects of epilepsy in elderly patients. The presence of precordial fibrillation requires anticoagulant therapy, the use of which increases the risk of both spontaneous and traumatic intracranial hemorrhage.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a76c/9410112/5d8a00fa9043/jpm-12-01306-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a76c/9410112/fe5853acdd69/jpm-12-01306-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a76c/9410112/2698758bf9ab/jpm-12-01306-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a76c/9410112/677056361a5a/jpm-12-01306-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a76c/9410112/5e369c3c1c89/jpm-12-01306-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a76c/9410112/552e13908487/jpm-12-01306-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a76c/9410112/9f7a18828b01/jpm-12-01306-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a76c/9410112/5d8a00fa9043/jpm-12-01306-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a76c/9410112/fe5853acdd69/jpm-12-01306-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a76c/9410112/2698758bf9ab/jpm-12-01306-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a76c/9410112/677056361a5a/jpm-12-01306-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a76c/9410112/5e369c3c1c89/jpm-12-01306-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a76c/9410112/552e13908487/jpm-12-01306-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a76c/9410112/9f7a18828b01/jpm-12-01306-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a76c/9410112/5d8a00fa9043/jpm-12-01306-g007.jpg
摘要

目前认为,机器学习方法在预测肿瘤血液学患者患癫痫(包括血管性癫痫)风险方面颇具前景。这些方法被用于研究中,以预测药物难治性癫痫和手术治疗结果,从而确定癫痫患者的致痫区和功能性神经系统,同时开发新的分类方法并执行其他任务。本文介绍了将机器学习应用于分析肿瘤血液学和心血管疾病患者数据以及开发癫痫诊断模型的结果。这项研究有助于解决肿瘤血液学或心血管疾病患者原发性癫痫诊断往往不合理的问题,即在未发现与单一癫痫发作综合征相关疾病的情况下,给患者开抗癫痫药物。我们分析了俄罗斯卫生部V.A. 阿尔马佐夫科研中心的医院数据库。该研究纳入了2010年至2020年期间66723例血管疾病(I10 - I15、I61 - I69、I20 - I25)患者的治疗记录以及16383例淋巴、造血及相关组织恶性肿瘤(根据ICD - 10为C81 - C96)患者的治疗记录。数据分析和模型计算表明,梯度提升算法表现最佳,平均准确率交叉验证分数 = 0.96,F1分数 = 98,加权平均精度 = 93,召回率 = 96,F1分数 = 94。G40与不同临床状况的最高相关系数出现在房颤、高血压、大脑前动脉狭窄或闭塞(0.16)、脑静脉窦血栓形成(0.089)、动脉高血压(0.17)、年龄(0.03)、非创伤性颅内出血(0.07)、心房颤动(0.05)、绝对中性粒细胞计数差值(0.05)、出院时血小板计数(0.04)、干细胞移植输血量(0.023)。从临床角度来看,在更广泛的患者模型中确定的预测因素重要性差异与器质性脑损伤的实用算法一致。心房颤动是缺血性和出血性中风发病的主要因素之一。同时,脑梗死在急性期可能伴有癫痫发作,在早期恢复阶段及更长时间内可能出现不明原因的癫痫发作和癫痫发展。此外,左心腔微栓塞可导致脑部多发性微灶性病变,这是老年患者癫痫发病机制的一个方面。存在心前区颤动需要进行抗凝治疗,而抗凝治疗会增加自发性和创伤性颅内出血的风险。

相似文献

1
Application of Machine Learning Methods for Epilepsy Risk Ranking in Patients with Hematopoietic Malignancies Using.使用机器学习方法对造血系统恶性肿瘤患者的癫痫风险进行排名的应用。
J Pers Med. 2022 Aug 11;12(8):1306. doi: 10.3390/jpm12081306.
2
Can machine learning predict late seizures after intracerebral hemorrhages? Evidence from real-world data.机器学习能否预测脑出血后的迟发性癫痫发作?来自真实世界数据的证据。
Epilepsy Behav. 2024 Aug;157:109835. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2024.109835. Epub 2024 May 30.
3
Machine learning model to predict the efficacy of antiseizure medications in patients with familial genetic generalized epilepsy.用于预测家族性遗传性全面性癫痫患者抗癫痫药物疗效的机器学习模型。
Epilepsy Res. 2022 Mar;181:106888. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2022.106888. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
4
EEG-Driven Prediction Model of Oxcarbazepine Treatment Outcomes in Patients With Newly-Diagnosed Focal Epilepsy.新诊断局灶性癫痫患者奥卡西平治疗结局的脑电图驱动预测模型
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Jan 3;8:781937. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.781937. eCollection 2021.
5
Pediatric stroke among Hong Kong Chinese subjects.香港华裔儿童的中风情况。
Pediatrics. 2004 Aug;114(2):e206-12. doi: 10.1542/peds.114.2.e206.
6
Large datasets from Electronic Health Records predict seizures after ischemic strokes: A Machine Learning approach.电子健康记录中的大型数据集可预测缺血性中风后的癫痫发作:一种机器学习方法。
medRxiv. 2024 Jan 26:2024.01.24.24301755. doi: 10.1101/2024.01.24.24301755.
7
8
Epileptic seizure detection: a comparative study between deep and traditional machine learning techniques.癫痫发作检测:深度学习与传统机器学习技术的比较研究
J Integr Neurosci. 2020 Mar 30;19(1):1-9. doi: 10.31083/j.jin.2020.01.24.
9
Machine-Learning-Derived Model for the Stratification of Cardiovascular risk in Patients with Ischemic Stroke.基于机器学习的缺血性脑卒中患者心血管风险分层模型。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2021 Oct;30(10):106018. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.106018. Epub 2021 Jul 31.
10
Comparative Effectiveness of Machine Learning Approaches for Predicting Gastrointestinal Bleeds in Patients Receiving Antithrombotic Treatment.机器学习方法预测抗血栓治疗患者胃肠道出血的效果比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 May 3;4(5):e2110703. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.10703.

本文引用的文献

1
A Systematic Review of Machine Learning Techniques in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT).机器学习技术在造血干细胞移植(HSCT)中的系统评价。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Oct 27;20(21):6100. doi: 10.3390/s20216100.
2
Incidence of venous thrombosis after peg-asparaginase in adolescent and young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.聚乙二醇化天冬酰胺酶治疗青少年和年轻成人急性淋巴细胞白血病后静脉血栓形成的发生率
Int J Hematol Oncol. 2020 Sep 4;9(3):IJH28. doi: 10.2217/ijh-2020-0009.
3
Epileptic seizures in cerebral venous sinus thrombosis: Subgroup analysis of VENOST study.
脑静脉窦血栓形成中的癫痫发作:VENOST 研究的亚组分析。
Seizure. 2020 May;78:113-117. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2020.02.017. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
4
Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) after haploidentical haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: incidence, risk factors and outcomes.同种异体造血干细胞移植后可逆性后部脑病综合征(PRES):发生率、危险因素和结局。
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2020 Oct;55(10):2035-2042. doi: 10.1038/s41409-020-0894-5. Epub 2020 Apr 18.
5
Atrial fibrillation among Russian men and women aged 55 years and older: prevalence, mortality, and associations with biomarkers in a population-based study.俄罗斯55岁及以上男性和女性的心房颤动:一项基于人群的研究中的患病率、死亡率及与生物标志物的关联
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2020 Feb;17(2):74-84. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2020.02.002.
6
Cerebral Venous Thrombosis in Hematological Malignancy: Balancing the Risks.血液恶性肿瘤中的脑静脉血栓形成:风险平衡。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020 Apr;29(4):104683. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.104683. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
7
Seizures and Outcome One Year After Neonatal and Childhood Cerebral Sinovenous Thrombosis.新生儿和儿童脑静脉窦血栓形成后 1 年的癫痫发作和结局。
Pediatr Neurol. 2020 Apr;105:21-26. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2019.08.012. Epub 2019 Oct 18.
8
Epidemiology and outcome of idiopathic generalized epilepsy in adults.成人特发性全面性癫痫的流行病学和结局。
Eur J Neurol. 2020 Apr;27(4):676-684. doi: 10.1111/ene.14142. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
9
Prospective validation study of an epilepsy seizure risk system for outpatient evaluation.前瞻性验证研究:一种用于门诊评估的癫痫发作风险系统。
Epilepsia. 2020 Jan;61(1):29-38. doi: 10.1111/epi.16397. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
10
Machine learning applications in epilepsy.机器学习在癫痫中的应用。
Epilepsia. 2019 Oct;60(10):2037-2047. doi: 10.1111/epi.16333. Epub 2019 Sep 3.