Suppr超能文献

名字有何含义?父母及医疗保健专业人员对儿童癌症易感基因致病变异的首选术语

What's in a Name? Parents' and Healthcare Professionals' Preferred Terminology for Pathogenic Variants in Childhood Cancer Predisposition Genes.

作者信息

Hunter Jacqueline D, Robertson Eden G, Hetherington Kate, Ziegler David S, Marshall Glenn M, Kirk Judy, Marron Jonathan M, Denburg Avram E, Barlow-Stewart Kristine, Warby Meera, Tucker Katherine M, Lee Brittany M, O'Brien Tracey A, Wakefield Claire E

机构信息

Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.

Behavioural Sciences Unit, Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia.

出版信息

J Pers Med. 2022 Aug 18;12(8):1327. doi: 10.3390/jpm12081327.

Abstract

Current literature/guidelines regarding the most appropriate term to communicate a cancer-related disease-causing germline variant in childhood cancer lack consensus. Guidelines also rarely address preferences of patients/families. We aimed to assess preferences of parents of children with cancer, genetics professionals, and pediatric oncologists towards terminology to describe a disease-causing germline variant in childhood cancer. Using semi-structured interviews we asked participants their most/least preferred terms from; 'faulty gene,' 'altered gene,' 'gene change,' and 'genetic variant,' analyzing responses with directed content analysis. Twenty-five parents, 6 genetics professionals, and 29 oncologists participated. An equal number of parents most preferred 'gene change,' 'altered gene,' or 'genetic variant' (n = 8/25). Parents least preferred 'faulty gene' (n = 18/25). Half the genetics professionals most preferred 'faulty gene' (n = 3/6); however this was least preferred by the remaining genetics professionals (n = 3/6). Many oncologists most preferred 'genetic variant' (n = 11/29) and least preferred 'faulty gene' (n = 19/29). Participants across all groups perceived 'faulty gene' as having negative connotations, potentially placing blame/guilt on parents/children. Health professionals described challenges selecting a term that was scientifically accurate, easily understood and not distressing to families. Lack of consensus highlights the need to be guided by families' preferred terminology, while providing accurate explanations regarding implications of genetic findings.

摘要

当前关于在儿童癌症中传达与癌症相关的致病种系变异最合适术语的文献/指南缺乏共识。指南也很少涉及患者/家庭的偏好。我们旨在评估癌症患儿家长、遗传学专业人员和儿科肿瘤学家对描述儿童癌症致病种系变异术语的偏好。通过半结构化访谈,我们询问参与者从“有缺陷的基因”“改变的基因”“基因变化”和“基因变异”中最喜欢/最不喜欢的术语,并使用定向内容分析法分析回答。25名家长、6名遗传学专业人员和29名肿瘤学家参与了研究。同样数量的家长最喜欢“基因变化”“改变的基因”或“基因变异”(25人中8人)。家长最不喜欢“有缺陷的基因”(25人中18人)。一半的遗传学专业人员最喜欢“有缺陷的基因”(6人中3人);然而,其余遗传学专业人员最不喜欢这个词(6人中3人)。许多肿瘤学家最喜欢“基因变异”(29人中11人),最不喜欢“有缺陷的基因”(29人中19人)。所有组的参与者都认为“有缺陷的基因”有负面含义,可能会让家长/孩子感到自责/内疚。卫生专业人员描述了选择一个科学准确、易于理解且不会让家庭感到痛苦的术语所面临的挑战。缺乏共识凸显了需要以家庭喜欢的术语为指导,同时就基因发现的影响提供准确解释。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54ad/9410181/402e74d7ccf8/jpm-12-01327-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验