Structured Reporting in Radiological Settings: Pitfalls and Perspectives.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this manuscript is to give an overview of structured reporting in radiological settings.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

This article is a narrative review on structured reporting in radiological settings. Particularly, limitations and future perspectives are analyzed.

RESULTS

The radiological report is a communication tool for the referring physician and the patients. It was conceived as a free text report (FTR) to allow radiologists to have their own individuality in the description of the radiological findings. However, this form could suffer from content, style, and presentation discrepancies, with a probability of transferring incorrect radiological data. Quality, datafication/quantification, and accessibility represent the three main goals in moving from FTRs to structured reports (SRs). In fact, the quality is related to standardization, which aims to improve communication and clarification. Moreover, a "structured" checklist, which allows all the fundamental items for a particular radiological study to be reported and permits the connection of the radiological data with clinical features, allowing a personalized medicine. With regard to accessibility, since radiological reports can be considered a source of research data, SR allows data mining to obtain new biomarkers and to help the development of new application domains, especially in the field of radiomics.

CONCLUSIONS

Structured reporting could eliminate radiologist individuality, allowing a standardized approach.