Shu Liang, Meyne Johannes, Jansen Olav, Jensen-Kondering Ulf
Department of Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, 24105 Kiel, Germany.
Department of Neurology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China.
Life (Basel). 2022 Aug 19;12(8):1273. doi: 10.3390/life12081273.
Introduction: High thrombus attenuation on CT has been suggested as a predictor of successful recanalization. It is as well speculated that thrombi of different density may be susceptible to different methods of mechanical thrombectomy. In this study we sought to determine the effect of different methods of manual thrombus delineation and reconstructed slice thickness on thrombus density. Material and Methods: Fifty-six patients with acute occlusion of the basilar artery treated with endovascular therapy were retrospectively included. Clinical, demographic, radiological and outcome parameters were collected. Two raters measured absolute and relative thrombus density employing three different methods (one region of interest, three regions of interest, whole thrombus delineation) and using three different reconstructed slice thicknesses (0.625, 2.5 and 5 mm) of the original admission CT. Results: Thirty-nine patients were successfully recanalized (thrombolysis in cerebral infarction score ≥ 2b). Good clinical outcome (modified Rankin scale ≤ 2) occurred significantly more often in the recanalized group (36 vs. 6%, p = 0.023, Fisher’s exact test), in the non-recanalized group symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage occurred more often (9 vs. 29%, p = 0.001, Fisher’s exact test). Absolute and relative thrombus density were largely different between methods and slice thicknesses. Multiple regression showed a decrease of thrombus density with increasing slice thickness (β = −3.98, p < 0.001) and logistic regression showed a statistically significant but very small relation between density and recanalization (β = 0.006, odds ratio (95% confidence interval) = 1.006 (1.003−1.01), p < 0.001). Conclusions: The methods for manual thrombus delineation and reconstructed slice thickness had a significant influence on absolute and relative thrombus density. Density alone may be of limited value as a predictive marker for recanalization success in acute occlusion of the basilar artery. Standards for density measurements must be defined when comparing different studies and when evaluating different methods of mechanical thrombectomy.
CT上血栓高密度被认为是成功再通的预测指标。也有人推测,不同密度的血栓可能对不同的机械取栓方法敏感。在本研究中,我们试图确定不同的手动血栓勾画方法和重建层厚对血栓密度的影响。
回顾性纳入56例接受血管内治疗的基底动脉急性闭塞患者。收集临床、人口统计学、放射学和结局参数。两名评估者采用三种不同方法(一个感兴趣区、三个感兴趣区、整个血栓勾画)并使用原始入院CT的三种不同重建层厚(0.625、2.5和5mm)测量绝对和相对血栓密度。
39例患者成功再通(脑梗死溶栓评分≥2b)。再通组良好临床结局(改良Rankin量表≤2)的发生率显著更高(36%对6%,p = 0.023,Fisher精确检验),未再通组症状性颅内出血的发生率更高(9%对29%,p = 0.001,Fisher精确检验)。不同方法和层厚之间的绝对和相对血栓密度差异很大。多元回归显示血栓密度随层厚增加而降低(β = -3.98,p < 0.001),逻辑回归显示密度与再通之间存在统计学显著但非常小的关系(β = 0.006,比值比(95%置信区间)= 1.006(1.003 - 1.01),p < 0.001)。
手动血栓勾画方法和重建层厚对绝对和相对血栓密度有显著影响。单独的密度作为基底动脉急性闭塞再通成功的预测标志物可能价值有限。在比较不同研究和评估不同机械取栓方法时,必须定义密度测量标准。