• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癌症患者诊断后补充维生素 D 与生存:荟萃分析。

Post-Diagnosis Vitamin D Supplement Use and Survival among Cancer Patients: A Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Food Science and Biotechnology, Dongguk University, Goyang 10326, Korea.

Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

出版信息

Nutrients. 2022 Aug 19;14(16):3418. doi: 10.3390/nu14163418.

DOI:10.3390/nu14163418
PMID:36014928
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9413994/
Abstract

Vitamin D administered pre-diagnostically has been shown to reduce mortality. Emerging evidence suggests a role of post-diagnosis vitamin D supplement intake for survival among cancer patients. Thus, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the relationship. PubMed and Embase were searched for relevant observational cohort studies and randomized trials published through April 2022. Summary relative risk (SRR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated using the DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model. The SRR for post-diagnosis vitamin D supplement use vs. non-use, pooling cohort studies and randomized trials, was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.78-0.98; = 0.02; = 0%) for overall survival, 0.81 (95% CI, 0.62-1.06; = 0.12; = 51%) for progression-free survival, 0.86 (95% CI, 0.72-1.03; = 0.10; = 0%) for cancer-specific survival, and 0.86 (95% CI, 0.64-1.14; = 0.29; = 0%) for relapse. Albeit not significantly heterogeneous by variables tested, a significant inverse association was limited to cohort studies and supplement use during cancer treatment for overall survival, and to studies with ≤3 years of follow-up for progression-free survival. Post-diagnosis vitamin D supplement use was associated with improved overall survival, but not progression-free or cancer-specific survival or relapse. Our findings require confirmation, as randomized trial evidence was insufficient to establish cause-and-effect relationships.

摘要

维生素 D 预先诊断已被证明可降低死亡率。新出现的证据表明,癌症患者在诊断后补充维生素 D 对生存可能有一定作用。因此,我们进行了一项荟萃分析来评估这种关系。检索了 PubMed 和 Embase 数据库中截至 2022 年 4 月发表的相关观察性队列研究和随机试验。使用 DerSimonian-Laird 随机效应模型估计汇总相对风险 (SRR) 和 95%置信区间 (CI)。汇总队列研究和随机试验中诊断后使用维生素 D 补充剂与未使用者的 SRR 为:总生存期为 0.87(95%CI,0.78-0.98; = 0.02; = 0%),无进展生存期为 0.81(95%CI,0.62-1.06; = 0.12; = 51%),癌症特异性生存期为 0.86(95%CI,0.72-1.03; = 0.10; = 0%),复发率为 0.86(95%CI,0.64-1.14; = 0.29; = 0%)。尽管按测试的变量分析并未出现显著异质性,但显著的负相关仅限于队列研究和癌症治疗期间的补充剂使用对总生存期,以及随访时间≤3 年的无进展生存期。诊断后使用维生素 D 补充剂与改善总生存期相关,但与无进展生存期或癌症特异性生存期或复发无关。我们的发现需要进一步确认,因为随机试验证据不足以建立因果关系。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fc3/9413994/e3a3c55e462a/nutrients-14-03418-g004a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fc3/9413994/fe78c47e3631/nutrients-14-03418-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fc3/9413994/fb7d9ac5d516/nutrients-14-03418-g002a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fc3/9413994/0c31749738c7/nutrients-14-03418-g003a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fc3/9413994/e3a3c55e462a/nutrients-14-03418-g004a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fc3/9413994/fe78c47e3631/nutrients-14-03418-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fc3/9413994/fb7d9ac5d516/nutrients-14-03418-g002a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fc3/9413994/0c31749738c7/nutrients-14-03418-g003a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fc3/9413994/e3a3c55e462a/nutrients-14-03418-g004a.jpg

相似文献

1
Post-Diagnosis Vitamin D Supplement Use and Survival among Cancer Patients: A Meta-Analysis.癌症患者诊断后补充维生素 D 与生存:荟萃分析。
Nutrients. 2022 Aug 19;14(16):3418. doi: 10.3390/nu14163418.
2
Vitamin D supplementation and total cancer incidence and mortality by daily vs. infrequent large-bolus dosing strategies: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.维生素 D 补充剂与每日剂量与非频繁大剂量冲击疗法对总癌症发病率和死亡率的影响:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Br J Cancer. 2022 Sep;127(5):872-878. doi: 10.1038/s41416-022-01850-2. Epub 2022 Jun 8.
3
Effect of Vitamin D Supplementation on Relapse-Free Survival Among Patients With Digestive Tract Cancers: The AMATERASU Randomized Clinical Trial.维生素 D 补充对消化道癌症患者无疾病生存的影响:AMATERASU 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2019 Apr 9;321(14):1361-1369. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.2210.
4
Association Between Calcium or Vitamin D Supplementation and Fracture Incidence in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.补充钙或维生素D与社区居住老年人骨折发生率之间的关联:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA. 2017 Dec 26;318(24):2466-2482. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.19344.
5
Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on vitamin D supplement and cancer incidence and mortality.维生素 D 补充剂与癌症发病率和死亡率的随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Biosci Rep. 2019 Nov 29;39(11). doi: 10.1042/BSR20190369.
6
Post-diagnosis dietary factors, supplement use and colorectal cancer prognosis: A Global Cancer Update Programme (CUP Global) systematic literature review and meta-analysis.诊断后饮食因素、补充剂使用与结直肠癌预后:全球癌症更新计划(CUP Global)系统文献回顾和荟萃分析。
Int J Cancer. 2024 Aug 1;155(3):445-470. doi: 10.1002/ijc.34906. Epub 2024 May 1.
7
The effect of vitamin D supplementation on knee osteoarthritis: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.维生素 D 补充对膝骨关节炎的影响:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2017 Oct;46:14-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.08.010. Epub 2017 Aug 7.
8
The effect of vitamin D-related interventions on multiple sclerosis relapses: a meta-analysis.维生素 D 相关干预对多发性硬化症复发的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Mult Scler. 2013 Oct;19(12):1571-9. doi: 10.1177/1352458513489756. Epub 2013 May 22.
9
Vitamin C and survival among women with breast cancer: a meta-analysis.维生素 C 与乳腺癌患者的生存:荟萃分析。
Eur J Cancer. 2014 May;50(7):1223-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.02.013. Epub 2014 Mar 7.
10
Efficacy of Vitamin D Supplements in Treatment of Acute Respiratory Infection: A Meta-Analysis for Randomized Controlled Trials.维生素 D 补充剂治疗急性呼吸道感染的疗效:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Nutrients. 2022 Mar 8;14(6):1144. doi: 10.3390/nu14061144.

引用本文的文献

1
Identification of Priority Nutrients in the US: Targeting Malnutrition to Address Diet-Related Disease Across the Lifespan.美国优先营养素的识别:针对营养不良以解决全生命周期中与饮食相关的疾病
Nutrients. 2025 Jun 9;17(12):1957. doi: 10.3390/nu17121957.
2
Vitamin D and prostate cancer prevention.维生素D与前列腺癌预防
World J Clin Oncol. 2024 Jun 24;15(6):691-694. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v15.i6.691.
3
Priority nutrients to address malnutrition and diet-related diseases in Australia and New Zealand.解决澳大利亚和新西兰营养不良及饮食相关疾病问题的优先营养素。

本文引用的文献

1
Vitamin D supplementation and total cancer incidence and mortality by daily vs. infrequent large-bolus dosing strategies: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.维生素 D 补充剂与每日剂量与非频繁大剂量冲击疗法对总癌症发病率和死亡率的影响:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Br J Cancer. 2022 Sep;127(5):872-878. doi: 10.1038/s41416-022-01850-2. Epub 2022 Jun 8.
2
Vitamin D: Bolus Is Bogus-A Narrative Review.维生素D:大剂量疗法不可取——一篇综述
JBMR Plus. 2021 Oct 30;5(12):e10567. doi: 10.1002/jbm4.10567. eCollection 2021 Dec.
3
Safety and effectiveness of vitamin D mega-dose: A systematic review.
Front Nutr. 2024 Mar 13;11:1370550. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1370550. eCollection 2024.
4
Nutritional Management of Oncological Symptoms: A Comprehensive Review.肿瘤症状的营养管理:全面综述
Nutrients. 2023 Dec 11;15(24):5068. doi: 10.3390/nu15245068.
5
Cancer Metabolism as a Therapeutic Target and Review of Interventions.癌症代谢作为治疗靶点及干预措施的综述。
Nutrients. 2023 Oct 1;15(19):4245. doi: 10.3390/nu15194245.
超大剂量维生素 D 的安全性和有效性:系统评价。
Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2021 Dec;46:115-120. doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2021.09.010. Epub 2021 Sep 25.
4
Vitamin D Supplementation and Disease-Free Survival in Stage II Melanoma: A Randomized Placebo Controlled Trial.维生素D补充剂与II期黑色素瘤无病生存期:一项随机安慰剂对照试验
Nutrients. 2021 Jun 4;13(6):1931. doi: 10.3390/nu13061931.
5
Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.《全球癌症统计数据 2020:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率估计》。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
6
Effect of High-Dose vs Standard-Dose Vitamin D Supplementation on Body Composition among Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Trial.高剂量与标准剂量维生素D补充剂对晚期或转移性结直肠癌患者身体成分的影响:一项随机试验
Cancers (Basel). 2020 Nov 20;12(11):3451. doi: 10.3390/cancers12113451.
7
Prognostic role of vitamin D receptor in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.维生素 D 受体在乳腺癌中的预后作用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Nov 1;20(1):1051. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07559-w.
8
The effect of vitamin D supplementation on survival in patients with colorectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.维生素 D 补充对结直肠癌患者生存的影响:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Br J Cancer. 2020 Nov;123(11):1705-1712. doi: 10.1038/s41416-020-01060-8. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
9
Vitamin D supplementation: upper limit for safety revisited?维生素 D 补充:安全性上限重新审视?
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2021 Jan;33(1):19-24. doi: 10.1007/s40520-020-01678-x. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
10
Dietary Supplement Use after Cancer Diagnosis in Relation to Total Mortality, Cancer Mortality and Recurrence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.癌症诊断后膳食补充剂的使用与总死亡率、癌症死亡率和复发的关系:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Nutr Cancer. 2021;73(1):16-30. doi: 10.1080/01635581.2020.1734215. Epub 2020 Mar 9.