Suppr超能文献

COVID-19 大流行期间妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)的空腹血糖诊断

Fasting Glucose for the Diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

机构信息

Obstetrics and Gynaecology Department, University of La Laguna, 38200 San Cristobal de La Laguna, Spain.

Spanish Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Group, Spanish Section of Perinatal Medicine (SEMEPE) of Spanish Society of Spanish Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (SEGO) and Spanish Society of Diabetes (SED), 28002 Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Nutrients. 2022 Aug 20;14(16):3432. doi: 10.3390/nu14163432.

Abstract

Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, different non-validated tests were proposed to simplify the diagnosis of gestational diabetes (GDM). Aim: To analyse the effects of replacing the two-step approach for Early-GDM and GDM diagnosis, with a fasting plasma glucose test. Material and Methods: This is a cohort study consisting of 3200 pregnant women: 400 with Early-GDM, 800 with GDM and 2000 with Non-GDM diagnosed using the two-step approach. Using fasting plasma glucose for Early-GDM and GDM diagnosis, according to the recommendations of Spain, Australia, Italy and the UK during the pandemic, the rates of missed and new Early-GDM and GDM were calculated and perinatal outcomes were analysed. Results: Using fasting plasma glucose in the first trimester >100 mg/dL for Early-GDM diagnosis, the rates of post-COVID missed and new Early-GDM were 79.5% and 3.2%, respectively. Using fasting plasma glucose at 24−28 weeks <84 or >92, 95 or 100 mg/dL for GDM diagnosis, the rates of missed GDM were 50.4%, 78%, 82.6% and 92.4%, respectively, and 8.6%, 5.6% and 2.3% women with Non-GDM were diagnosed with new GDM. Conclusion: Fasting plasma glucose is not a good test for the diagnosis of GDM either in the first trimester or at 24−28 weeks.

摘要

背景

在 COVID-19 大流行期间,提出了不同未经验证的测试方法来简化妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)的诊断。目的:分析用空腹血糖检测替代两步法诊断早期 GDM 和 GDM 的效果。材料和方法:这是一项包含 3200 名孕妇的队列研究:400 名患有早期 GDM,800 名患有 GDM,2000 名患有非 GDM,采用两步法诊断。根据西班牙、澳大利亚、意大利和英国在大流行期间的建议,使用空腹血糖进行早期 GDM 和 GDM 诊断,计算漏诊和新诊断的早期 GDM 和 GDM 的发生率,并分析围产期结局。结果:使用空腹血糖>100mg/dL 诊断早期 GDM,COVID 后漏诊和新发早期 GDM 的发生率分别为 79.5%和 3.2%。使用 24-28 周时空腹血糖<84 或>92、95 或 100mg/dL 诊断 GDM,漏诊 GDM 的发生率分别为 50.4%、78%、82.6%和 92.4%,非 GDM 妇女新诊断为 GDM 的发生率分别为 8.6%、5.6%和 2.3%。结论:空腹血糖无论是在孕早期还是 24-28 周时,都不是诊断 GDM 的良好检测方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07ff/9415001/682dec2106c2/nutrients-14-03432-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验