• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无人机互联网中的信念管理的分层分析过程。

Hierarchical Analysis Process for Belief Management in Internet of Drones.

机构信息

Transportation Research Institute (IMOB), Hasselt University, 3500 Hasselt, Belgium.

Computer Sciences Department, German University of Technology in Oman (GUtech), Athaibah, Muscat 130, Oman.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2022 Aug 17;22(16):6146. doi: 10.3390/s22166146.

DOI:10.3390/s22166146
PMID:36015907
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9412459/
Abstract

Group awareness is playing a major role in the efficiency of mission planning and decision-making processes, particularly those involving spatially distributed collaborative entities. The performance of this concept has remarkably increased with the advent of the Internet of Things (IoT). Indeed, a myriad of innovative devices are being extensively deployed to collaboratively recognize and track events, objects, and activities of interest. A wide range of IoT-based approaches have focused on representing and managing shared information through formal operators for group awareness. However, despite their proven results, these approaches are still refrained by the inaccuracy of information being shared between the collaborating distributed entities. In order to address this issue, we propose in this paper a new belief-management-based model for a collaborative Internet of Drones (IoD). The proposed model allows drones to decide the most appropriate operators to apply in order to manage the uncertainty of perceived or received information in different situations. This model uses Hierarchical Analysis Process (AHP) with Subjective Logic (SL) to represent and combine opinions of different sources. We focus on purely collaborative drone networks where the group awareness will also be provided as service to collaborating entities.

摘要

群体意识在任务规划和决策过程的效率中起着重要作用,特别是在涉及空间分布的协作实体时。随着物联网(IoT)的出现,这一概念的性能得到了显著提高。事实上,大量创新设备正在被广泛部署,以协作识别和跟踪感兴趣的事件、对象和活动。许多基于物联网的方法都侧重于通过用于群体意识的形式运算符来表示和管理共享信息。然而,尽管这些方法已经得到了验证,但它们仍然受到协作分布式实体之间共享信息的准确性的限制。为了解决这个问题,我们在本文中提出了一种新的基于置信度管理的无人机协同物联网(IoD)模型。所提出的模型允许无人机决定应用最合适的运算符,以便在不同情况下管理感知或接收信息的不确定性。该模型使用层次分析过程(AHP)与主观逻辑(SL)来表示和组合不同来源的意见。我们专注于纯粹的协作无人机网络,其中群体意识也将作为服务提供给协作实体。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86a2/9412459/0db47b5a83fa/sensors-22-06146-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86a2/9412459/76c924f987a9/sensors-22-06146-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86a2/9412459/532e7fc5f23d/sensors-22-06146-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86a2/9412459/3793a5765f5a/sensors-22-06146-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86a2/9412459/eccf0b546fd3/sensors-22-06146-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86a2/9412459/38ee8e1322db/sensors-22-06146-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86a2/9412459/835701367cdc/sensors-22-06146-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86a2/9412459/2716149a293e/sensors-22-06146-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86a2/9412459/53dd4bd56f16/sensors-22-06146-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86a2/9412459/20ac3f2db8a1/sensors-22-06146-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86a2/9412459/f4cb26370c3c/sensors-22-06146-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86a2/9412459/0db47b5a83fa/sensors-22-06146-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86a2/9412459/76c924f987a9/sensors-22-06146-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86a2/9412459/532e7fc5f23d/sensors-22-06146-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86a2/9412459/3793a5765f5a/sensors-22-06146-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86a2/9412459/eccf0b546fd3/sensors-22-06146-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86a2/9412459/38ee8e1322db/sensors-22-06146-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86a2/9412459/835701367cdc/sensors-22-06146-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86a2/9412459/2716149a293e/sensors-22-06146-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86a2/9412459/53dd4bd56f16/sensors-22-06146-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86a2/9412459/20ac3f2db8a1/sensors-22-06146-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86a2/9412459/f4cb26370c3c/sensors-22-06146-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86a2/9412459/0db47b5a83fa/sensors-22-06146-g011.jpg

相似文献

1
Hierarchical Analysis Process for Belief Management in Internet of Drones.无人机互联网中的信念管理的分层分析过程。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Aug 17;22(16):6146. doi: 10.3390/s22166146.
2
LoRa Communications as an Enabler for Internet of Drones towards Large-Scale Livestock Monitoring in Rural Farms.LoRa 通信作为无人机物联网在农村农场大规模牲畜监测中的使能技术。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Jul 26;21(15):5044. doi: 10.3390/s21155044.
3
Smart Cybersecurity Framework for IoT-Empowered Drones: Machine Learning Perspective.面向物联网赋能无人机的智能网络安全框架:机器学习视角。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Mar 29;22(7):2630. doi: 10.3390/s22072630.
4
Research Trends in Collaborative Drones.协同无人机研究趋势。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Apr 26;22(9):3321. doi: 10.3390/s22093321.
5
Perceived difficulty, flight information access, and performance of male and female novice drone operators.男性和女性新手无人机操作员感知难度、飞行信息获取与表现。
Work. 2022;72(4):1259-1268. doi: 10.3233/WOR-210862.
6
Authentication and Delegation for Operating a Multi-Drone System.用于操作多无人机系统的认证与委托
Sensors (Basel). 2019 May 3;19(9):2066. doi: 10.3390/s19092066.
7
Task-Incremental Learning for Drone Pilot Identification Scheme.面向无人机驾驶员识别方案的任务增量学习。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Jun 27;23(13):5981. doi: 10.3390/s23135981.
8
A Mission-Oriented Flight Path and Charging Mechanism for Internet of Drones.面向任务的无人机物联网飞行路径和充电机制。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Apr 25;23(9):4269. doi: 10.3390/s23094269.
9
Cooperatively Routing a Truck and Multiple Drones for Target Surveillance.协同规划卡车和多架无人机进行目标监测。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Apr 10;22(8):2909. doi: 10.3390/s22082909.
10
Flight Planning Optimization of Multiple UAVs for Internet of Things.用于物联网的多架无人机飞行计划优化
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Nov 20;21(22):7735. doi: 10.3390/s21227735.

引用本文的文献

1
Multicriteria Methodology for Prioritizing Predictive Maintenance Using RPASs (Drones) with Thermal Cameras on Transmission Lines.使用配备热成像相机的遥控驾驶航空器系统(无人机)对输电线路进行预测性维护优先级排序的多标准方法。
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Aug 14;25(16):5064. doi: 10.3390/s25165064.

本文引用的文献

1
Conflict Data Fusion in a Multi-Agent System Premised on the Base Basic Probability Assignment and Evidence Distance.基于基本概率分配和证据距离的多智能体系统中的冲突数据融合
Entropy (Basel). 2021 Jun 28;23(7):820. doi: 10.3390/e23070820.
2
On the Quantification of Model Uncertainty: A Bayesian Perspective.模型不确定性的量化:贝叶斯视角。
Psychometrika. 2021 Mar;86(1):215-238. doi: 10.1007/s11336-021-09754-5. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
3
Elderly Perception on the Internet of Things-Based Integrated Smart-Home System.老年人对基于物联网的集成智能家居系统的感知。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Feb 11;21(4):1284. doi: 10.3390/s21041284.
4
Improved Base Belief Function-Based Conflict Data Fusion Approach Considering Belief Entropy in the Evidence Theory.证据理论中基于改进基本信度函数的考虑信度熵的冲突数据融合方法
Entropy (Basel). 2020 Jul 22;22(8):801. doi: 10.3390/e22080801.
5
"This Is What We Don't Know": Treating Epistemic Uncertainty in Bayesian Networks for Risk Assessment.“这是我们不知道的”:在风险评估的贝叶斯网络中处理认知不确定性。
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2021 Jan;17(1):221-232. doi: 10.1002/ieam.4367. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
6
A modified belief entropy in Dempster-Shafer framework.证据理论框架下的一种修正信念熵
PLoS One. 2017 May 8;12(5):e0176832. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176832. eCollection 2017.
7
A Weighted Belief Entropy-Based Uncertainty Measure for Multi-Sensor Data Fusion.一种基于加权信念熵的多传感器数据融合不确定性度量方法。
Sensors (Basel). 2017 Apr 22;17(4):928. doi: 10.3390/s17040928.