• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医生对昂贵抗癌治疗相关伦理问题的看法:一项定性研究。

Physicians' Perspectives on Ethical Issues Regarding Expensive Anti-Cancer Treatments: A Qualitative Study.

机构信息

Department of Medical Ethics, Philosophy and History of Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2022 Oct-Dec;13(4):275-286. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2022.2110963. Epub 2022 Aug 26.

DOI:10.1080/23294515.2022.2110963
PMID:36017997
Abstract

BACKGROUND

When anti-cancer treatments have been given market authorization, but are not (yet) reimbursed within a healthcare system, physicians are confronted with ethical dilemmas. Arranging access through other channels, e.g., hospital budgets or out-of-pocket payments by patients, may benefit patients, but leads to unequal access. Until now, little is known about the perspectives of physicians on access to non-reimbursed treatments. This interview study maps the experiences and moral views of Dutch oncologists and hematologists.

METHODS

A diverse sample of oncologists and hematologists (n = 22) were interviewed. Interviews were analyzed thematically using Nvivo 12 qualitative data software.

RESULTS

This study reveals stark differences between physicians' experiences and moral views on access to anti-cancer treatments that are not (yet) reimbursed: some physicians try to arrange other ways of access and some physicians do not. Some physicians inform patients about anti-cancer treatments that are not yet reimbursed, while others wait for reimbursement. Some physicians have principled moral objections to out-of-pocket payment, while others do not.

CONCLUSION

Oncologists and hematologists in the Netherlands differ greatly in their perspectives on access to expensive anti-cancer treatments that are not (yet) reimbursed. As a result, they may act differently when confronted with dilemmas in the consultation room. Physicians working in different healthcare systems may face similar dilemmas.

摘要

背景

当抗癌治疗已获得市场授权,但在医疗体系内尚未(获得)报销时,医生会面临伦理困境。通过医院预算或患者自费等其他渠道来安排获得这些治疗可能使患者受益,但会导致获得机会不平等。到目前为止,人们对医生对获得未报销治疗的看法知之甚少。本访谈研究旨在描绘荷兰肿瘤学家和血液学家对获得未报销治疗的看法和体验。

方法

我们对多样化的肿瘤学家和血液学家(n=22)进行了访谈。使用 Nvivo 12 定性数据分析软件对访谈进行主题分析。

结果

本研究揭示了医生在获得未报销的抗癌治疗方面的经验和道德观点之间存在明显差异:一些医生试图安排其他获得途径,而另一些医生则不这样做。一些医生会告知患者有关尚未报销的抗癌治疗,而另一些医生则等待报销。一些医生从原则上反对自费支付,而另一些医生则不反对。

结论

荷兰的肿瘤学家和血液学家在获得昂贵的未报销抗癌治疗方面的观点存在很大差异。因此,他们在咨询室面对困境时可能会采取不同的行动。在不同医疗体系中工作的医生可能会面临类似的困境。

相似文献

1
Physicians' Perspectives on Ethical Issues Regarding Expensive Anti-Cancer Treatments: A Qualitative Study.医生对昂贵抗癌治疗相关伦理问题的看法:一项定性研究。
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2022 Oct-Dec;13(4):275-286. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2022.2110963. Epub 2022 Aug 26.
2
[Dilemmas regarding access to non-reimbursed treatments in the Netherlands: an ethical perspective].[荷兰非报销治疗获取方面的困境:伦理视角]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2023 Jul 12;167:D7580.
3
Should Patients Be Allowed to Pay Out of Pocket? The Ethical Dilemma of Access to Expensive Anti-cancer Treatments in Universal Healthcare Systems: A Dutch Case Study.应允许患者自掏腰包付费吗?全民医疗保健系统中获取昂贵抗癌治疗的伦理困境:一项荷兰案例研究。
J Bioeth Inq. 2024 Dec;21(4):771-784. doi: 10.1007/s11673-024-10342-2. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
4
Ethics of access to newly approved expensive medical treatments: multi-stakeholder dialogues in a publicly funded healthcare system.获取新批准的昂贵医疗治疗的伦理问题:公共资助医疗体系中的多利益相关方对话
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Jan 29;14:1265029. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1265029. eCollection 2023.
5
Recommending Unfunded Innovative Cancer Therapies: Ethical vs. Clinical Perspectives among Oncologists on a Public Healthcare System-A Mixed-Methods Study.推荐未获资助的创新癌症疗法:公共医疗体系中肿瘤学家的伦理与临床观点——一项混合方法研究。
Curr Oncol. 2021 Aug 2;28(4):2902-2913. doi: 10.3390/curroncol28040254.
6
The Role of Physicians in Expanded Access to Investigational Drugs: A Mixed-Methods Study of Physicians' Views and Experiences in The Netherlands.《扩大获得研究性药物的机会中医生的作用:荷兰医生的观点和经验的混合方法研究》
J Bioeth Inq. 2021 Jul;18(2):319-334. doi: 10.1007/s11673-021-10090-7. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
7
What do patients with unmet medical needs want? A qualitative study of patients' views and experiences with expanded access to unapproved, investigational treatments in the Netherlands.未满足医疗需求的患者需要什么?荷兰扩大未批准的研究性治疗方法获取途径的患者观点和经验的定性研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2019 Nov 9;20(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12910-019-0420-8.
8
Ethical uncertainty and COVID-19: exploring the lived experiences of senior physicians at a major medical centre.伦理不确定性和 COVID-19:探索一家主要医疗中心的资深医师的生活体验。
J Med Ethics. 2023 Apr;49(4):275-282. doi: 10.1136/jme-2022-108369. Epub 2022 Dec 8.
9
Moral experience and ethical challenges in an emergency department in Pakistan: emergency physicians' perspectives.巴基斯坦一家急诊科的道德体验与伦理挑战:急诊医生的观点
Emerg Med J. 2015 Apr;32(4):263-8. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2014-204081. Epub 2014 Sep 18.
10
Ethical problems in intensive care unit admission and discharge decisions: a qualitative study among physicians and nurses in the Netherlands.重症监护病房收治与出院决策中的伦理问题:荷兰医生和护士的定性研究
BMC Med Ethics. 2015 Feb 26;16:9. doi: 10.1186/s12910-015-0001-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Association of financial hardship and survival in working-age patients following cancer diagnosis in Taiwan.台湾地区癌症确诊后工作年龄患者的经济困难与生存情况的关联
Oncologist. 2025 Jun 4;30(6). doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyaf140.
2
Should Patients Be Allowed to Pay Out of Pocket? The Ethical Dilemma of Access to Expensive Anti-cancer Treatments in Universal Healthcare Systems: A Dutch Case Study.应允许患者自掏腰包付费吗?全民医疗保健系统中获取昂贵抗癌治疗的伦理困境:一项荷兰案例研究。
J Bioeth Inq. 2024 Dec;21(4):771-784. doi: 10.1007/s11673-024-10342-2. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
3
Ethics of access to newly approved expensive medical treatments: multi-stakeholder dialogues in a publicly funded healthcare system.
获取新批准的昂贵医疗治疗的伦理问题:公共资助医疗体系中的多利益相关方对话
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Jan 29;14:1265029. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1265029. eCollection 2023.
4
Can Voluntary Health Insurance for Non-reimbursed Expensive New Treatments Be Just?非报销性昂贵新疗法的自愿健康保险能否做到公平?
Public Health Ethics. 2023 Jul 16;16(2):191-201. doi: 10.1093/phe/phad015. eCollection 2023 Jul.