Faculty of Social Services and Health Care, LAB University of Applied Sciences, Lahti, Finland.
Department of Health, Zürich University of Applied Sciences ZHAW, Institute for Physiotherapy, Winterthur, Switzerland.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Aug 26;10(8):e39682. doi: 10.2196/39682.
The role of self-management in health promotion, as well as prevention and rehabilitation, is increasing through the use of mobile health (mHealth) apps. Such mHealth apps are also increasingly being used for self-management of low back pain (LBP), but their effectiveness has not been sufficiently explored.
The aim of this scoping review was to provide an overview of the literature on self-management mHealth apps and their effects on the levels of pain and disability in people with LBP.
We applied the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) methodology, including a priori research questions. A literature search was conducted in 2 databases (PubMed and PEDro) for studies published between January 1, 2015, and June 17, 2021. Interventional, cohort, or case series studies with an interventional period were included if the mHealth app included built-in self-management content, the app was used for self-management for people with LBP, and the study reported outcomes regarding pain and disability in people with LBP.
In total, 7 studies were selected for the review with overall 2307 persons with LBP, of whom 1328 (57.56%) were women. Among the studies (5/7, 71%) that reported the type of pain, 85% (390/459) of the participants were experiencing chronic LBP. A total of 5 different mHealth apps were identified, of which 4 contributed to a statistically significant reduction in LBP and clinically meaningful changes. Of the 7 studies, 4 (57%) used 4 different assessments for disability, of which 3 (75%) showed statistically significant improvements in the level of functional ability of participants in the experimental groups using an mHealth app with built-in self-management content for LBP.
This scoping review supports the conclusion that people with LBP may benefit from mHealth apps that provide self-management content. However, the generalizability of the findings is limited because of heterogeneity in the pain characterization of the included participants and the intervention durations. More high-quality studies with longer follow-up periods to investigate personalized mHealth approaches are recommended for LBP self-management.
通过使用移动健康 (mHealth) 应用程序,自我管理在健康促进、预防和康复方面的作用正在增强。这些 mHealth 应用程序也越来越多地被用于腰痛 (LBP) 的自我管理,但它们的效果尚未得到充分探索。
本综述的目的是概述关于自我管理 mHealth 应用程序及其对腰痛患者疼痛和残疾水平影响的文献。
我们应用了 PRISMA-ScR(系统评价和荟萃分析扩展的首选报告项目用于范围综述)方法,包括预先确定的研究问题。在 2 个数据库(PubMed 和 PEDro)中进行了文献检索,检索了 2015 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 6 月 17 日期间发表的研究。如果 mHealth 应用程序包含内置的自我管理内容、应用程序用于腰痛患者的自我管理,并且研究报告了腰痛患者的疼痛和残疾结果,则纳入干预性、队列或病例系列研究,其中包括干预期。
共有 7 项研究被纳入综述,共有 2307 名腰痛患者,其中 1328 名(57.56%)为女性。在报告疼痛类型的研究中(7 项研究中的 5 项,71%),85%(390/459)的参与者患有慢性腰痛。确定了 5 种不同的 mHealth 应用程序,其中 4 种可显著降低腰痛和具有临床意义的变化。在这 7 项研究中,有 4 项(57%)使用了 4 种不同的残疾评估方法,其中 3 项(75%)表明使用内置自我管理内容的 mHealth 应用程序的实验组参与者的功能能力水平有统计学显著提高。
本范围综述支持这样的结论,即腰痛患者可能受益于提供自我管理内容的 mHealth 应用程序。然而,由于纳入参与者的疼痛特征和干预持续时间的异质性,研究结果的普遍性有限。建议进行更多高质量的研究,随访时间更长,以研究针对腰痛的个性化 mHealth 方法。