Dunbar Robert P, Egol Kenneth A, Jones Clifford B, Ertl Jan P, Mullis Brian, Perez Edward, Collinge Cory A, Ostrum Robert, Humphrey Catherine, Gardner Michael J, Ricci William M, Phieffer Laura S, Teague David, Ertl William, Born Christopher T, Zonno Alan, Siegel Jodi, Sagi Henry Claude, Pollak Andrew, Schmidt Andrew H, Templeman David C, Sems Andrew, Friess Darin M, Pape Hans-Christoph, Krieg James C, Tornetta Paul
Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, Harborview Medical Center/University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY.
J Orthop Trauma. 2023 Feb 1;37(2):70-76. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002482.
The 2 main forms of treatment for distal femur fractures are locked lateral plating and retrograde nailing. The goal of this trial was to determine whether there are significant differences in outcomes between these forms of treatment.
Multicenter randomized controlled trial.
Twenty academic trauma centers.
PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: One hundred sixty patients with distal femur fractures were enrolled. One hundred twenty-six patients were followed 12 months. Patients were randomized to plating in 62 cases and intramedullary nailing in 64 cases.
Lateral locked plating or retrograde intramedullary nailing.
Functional scoring including Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment, bother index, EQ Health, and EQ Index. Secondary measures included alignment, operative time, range of motion, union rate, walking ability, ability to manage stairs, and number and type of adverse events.
Functional testing showed no difference between the groups. Both groups were still significantly affected by their fracture 12 months after injury. There was more coronal plane valgus in the plating group, which approached statistical significance. Range of motion, walking ability, and ability to manage stairs were similar between the groups. Rate and type of adverse events were not statistically different between the groups.
Both lateral locked plating and retrograde intramedullary nailing are reasonable surgical options for these fractures. Patients continue to improve over the course of the year after injury but remain impaired 1 year postoperatively.
Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
股骨远端骨折的两种主要治疗方式是锁定外侧钢板固定和逆行髓内钉固定。本试验的目的是确定这两种治疗方式在治疗结果上是否存在显著差异。
多中心随机对照试验。
20个学术性创伤中心。
患者/参与者:招募了160例股骨远端骨折患者。126例患者接受了为期12个月的随访。患者被随机分为钢板固定组62例和髓内钉固定组64例。
外侧锁定钢板固定或逆行髓内钉固定。
功能评分,包括简短肌肉骨骼功能评估、困扰指数、EQ健康状况和EQ指数。次要指标包括对线情况、手术时间、活动范围、骨愈合率、行走能力、上下楼梯能力以及不良事件的数量和类型。
功能测试显示两组之间无差异。两组在受伤12个月后仍受到骨折的显著影响。钢板固定组的冠状面外翻更多,接近统计学意义。两组之间的活动范围、行走能力和上下楼梯能力相似。两组之间不良事件的发生率和类型无统计学差异。
外侧锁定钢板固定和逆行髓内钉固定都是治疗这些骨折的合理手术选择。患者在受伤后的一年中持续改善,但术后1年仍有功能障碍。
治疗性I级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参阅作者指南。