Roux Nicolas, Kaufmann Lisa, Bhan Manan, Le Noe Julia, Matej Sarah, Laroche Perrine, Kastner Thomas, Bondeau Alberte, Haberl Helmut, Erb Karlheinz
University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Department of Economics and Social Sciences, Institute of Social Ecology, Schottenfeldgasse 29, 1070 Vienna, Austria.
University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Department of Economics and Social Sciences, Institute of Social Ecology, Schottenfeldgasse 29, 1070 Vienna, Austria; Geology Laboratory, École Normale Supérieur, PSL University, Paris, France.
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Dec 10;851(Pt 2):158198. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158198. Epub 2022 Aug 24.
The global livestock system puts increasing pressures on ecosystems. Studies analyzing the ecological impacts of livestock supply chains often explain this pressure by the increasing demand for animal products. Food regime theory proposes a more nuanced perspective: it explains livestock-related pressures on ecosystems by systemic changes along the supply chains of feed and animal products, notably the liberalization of agricultural trade. This study proposes a framework supporting empirical analyses of such claims by differentiating several steps of livestock supply chains. We reconstructed "trilateral" livestock supply chains linking feed production, livestock farming, and final consumption, based on the global flows of 161 feed and 13 animal products between 222 countries from 1986 to 2013. We used the embodied Human Appropriation of Net Primary Production (eHANPP) indicator to quantify pressures on ecosystems linked to these trilateral livestock supply chains. We find that livestock induced 65 % of agriculture's pressure on ecosystems, mostly through cattle grazing. Between 1986 and 2013, the fraction of livestock-related eHANPP that was traded internationally doubled from 7.1 % to 15.6 %. eHANPP related to the trade of feed was mostly linked to soybean imported for pig meat production, whereas eHANPP associated to traded animal products was mostly linked to cattle meat. eHANPP of traded animal products was lower but increased faster than eHANPP of feed trade. eHANPP was highest at the feed production level in South and North America, and at the consumption level in Eastern Asia. In Northern Asia and Eastern Europe, eHANPP was lowest at the animal products production level. In Western Europe, the eHANPP was equal at the animal products production and consumption levels. Our findings suggest that options to reduce livestock's pressures on ecosystems exist at all levels of the supply chain, especially by reducing the production and consumption in high-consuming countries and regulating international supply chains.
全球畜牧业系统给生态系统带来了越来越大的压力。分析畜牧供应链生态影响的研究通常将这种压力归因于对动物产品需求的增加。食物体制理论提出了一个更细致入微的观点:它通过饲料和动物产品供应链上的系统性变化,特别是农产品贸易自由化,来解释畜牧业对生态系统的压力。本研究提出了一个框架,通过区分畜牧供应链的几个步骤来支持对此类观点的实证分析。我们基于1986年至2013年期间222个国家之间161种饲料和13种动物产品的全球流动,重建了连接饲料生产、畜牧养殖和最终消费的“三边”畜牧供应链。我们使用体现式人类对净初级生产的占用(eHANPP)指标来量化与这些三边畜牧供应链相关的生态系统压力。我们发现,畜牧业造成了农业对生态系统65%的压力,主要是通过牛放牧。1986年至2013年期间,国际交易的与畜牧业相关的eHANPP份额从7.1%翻了一番,增至15.6%。与饲料贸易相关的eHANPP主要与用于猪肉生产而进口的大豆有关,而与交易动物产品相关的eHANPP主要与牛肉有关。交易动物产品的eHANPP较低,但增长速度快于饲料贸易的eHANPP。南美洲和北美洲的饲料生产水平的eHANPP最高,东亚的消费水平的eHANPP最高。在北亚和东欧,动物产品生产水平的eHANPP最低。在西欧,动物产品生产和消费水平的eHANPP相等。我们的研究结果表明,在供应链的各个层面都存在减轻畜牧业对生态系统压力的选择,特别是通过减少高消费国家的生产和消费以及规范国际供应链。