• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

围产期共享决策措施的信度和效度:分娩选择、信息和以人为中心的解释。

Reliability and Validity of a Perinatal Shared Decision-Making Measure: The Childbirth Options, Information, and Person-Centered Explanation.

出版信息

J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2022 Nov;51(6):631-642. doi: 10.1016/j.jogn.2022.08.001. Epub 2022 Aug 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.jogn.2022.08.001
PMID:36028146
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To develop and test the psychometric properties of a shared decision-making tool: Childbirth Options, Information, and Person-Centered Explanation (CHOICEs).

DESIGN

Multiphase instrument development study beginning with item development through a cross-sectional postpartum survey.

SETTING

The cross-sectional postpartum survey was distributed online through convenience and snowball sampling methods.

METHODS

We developed instrument items through an iterative process with key stakeholders. We evaluated reliability based on internal consistency and differential item functioning analysis. We evaluated validity on evidence of construct validity. We used criterion-related item mapping to evaluate whether the measure addressed the full spectrum of shared decision making related to maternity care.

RESULTS

Surveys were completed by 1,171 participants. A Cronbach's α coefficient of .99 supported internal consistency reliability. Infit and outfit statistics that ranged from 0.92 to 1.55 supported item fit. Differential item functioning analysis showed that CHOICEs scores were invariant between different demographic groups. Significant positive correlations between scores on CHOICEs and the Mothers on Respect index (r = 0.75, p = .01) and the Mothers Autonomy in Decision-Making scale (r = 0.75, p = .01) supported criterion-related validity. Item mapping suggested more items were needed to capture the full spectrum of shared decision making.

CONCLUSION

We recommend using CHOICEs to evaluate shared decision making in maternity care for research and quality improvement projects.

摘要

目的

开发和测试一种共享决策工具的心理测量学特性:分娩选择、信息和以人为中心的解释(CHOICEs)。

设计

多阶段仪器开发研究,从项目开发开始,通过横断面产后调查进行。

地点

横断面产后调查通过方便和滚雪球抽样方法在线发布。

方法

我们通过与主要利益相关者的迭代过程开发仪器项目。我们通过结构有效性的证据评估了可靠性,包括内部一致性和差异项目功能分析。我们使用基于标准的项目映射来评估该措施是否涵盖了与产妇护理相关的共享决策的全部范围。

结果

共有 1171 名参与者完成了调查。Cronbach's α 系数为 0.99,支持内部一致性可靠性。范围在 0.92 到 1.55 的拟合和拟合统计数据支持项目拟合。差异项目功能分析表明,CHOICEs 评分在不同人口统计学群体之间是不变的。CHOICEs 评分与尊重母亲指数(r = 0.75,p = 0.01)和母亲决策自主权量表(r = 0.75,p = 0.01)之间呈显著正相关,支持了标准相关的有效性。项目映射表明,需要更多的项目来捕捉共享决策的全部范围。

结论

我们建议在产妇护理中使用 CHOICEs 来评估共享决策,用于研究和质量改进项目。

相似文献

1
Reliability and Validity of a Perinatal Shared Decision-Making Measure: The Childbirth Options, Information, and Person-Centered Explanation.围产期共享决策措施的信度和效度:分娩选择、信息和以人为中心的解释。
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2022 Nov;51(6):631-642. doi: 10.1016/j.jogn.2022.08.001. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
2
The Mother's Autonomy in Decision Making (MADM) scale: Patient-led development and psychometric testing of a new instrument to evaluate experience of maternity care.母亲决策自主权(MADM)量表:一种用于评估产妇护理体验的新工具的患者主导开发及心理测量测试
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 23;12(2):e0171804. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171804. eCollection 2017.
3
Assessing Dutch women's experiences of labour and birth: adaptations and psychometric evaluations of the measures Mothers on Autonomy in Decision Making Scale, Mothers on Respect Index, and Childbirth Experience Questionnaire 2.0.评估荷兰女性的分娩经历:自主决策量表、尊重指数和生育体验问卷 2.0 的测量方法的调整和心理计量学评估。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Feb 18;22(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04445-0.
4
Validation of the person-centered maternity care scale at governmental health facilities in Cambodia.柬埔寨政府医疗机构中以个人为中心的孕产护理量表的验证。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 6;18(7):e0288051. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288051. eCollection 2023.
5
Validation of a measure to assess decision-making autonomy in family planning services in three low- and middle-income countries: The Family Planning Autonomous Decision-Making scale (FP-ADM).验证一种用于评估三个中低收入国家计划生育服务中决策自主权的衡量标准:计划生育自主决策量表(FP-ADM)。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 3;18(11):e0293586. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293586. eCollection 2023.
6
Psychometric assessment of the US person-centered prenatal and maternity care scales in a low-income predominantly Latinx population in California.在美国加利福尼亚州的一个以拉丁裔为主的低收入人群中,对以个人为中心的产前和产妇护理量表进行心理测量评估。
BMC Womens Health. 2023 Nov 17;23(1):616. doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02721-5.
7
Measuring respect and autonomy in Dutch maternity care: Applicability of two measures.测量荷兰产科护理中的尊重和自主权:两种测量方法的适用性。
Women Birth. 2020 Sep;33(5):e447-e454. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2019.10.008. Epub 2019 Nov 30.
8
Validation of the person-centered maternity care scale in India.印度以人为本的母婴护理量表的验证。
Reprod Health. 2018 Aug 29;15(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s12978-018-0591-7.
9
Validity and reliability of the 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) in a national survey in Hungary.匈牙利全国性调查中 9 项共享决策问卷(SDM-Q-9)的有效性和可靠性。
Eur J Health Econ. 2019 Jun;20(Suppl 1):43-55. doi: 10.1007/s10198-019-01061-2. Epub 2019 May 20.
10
Development of the person-centered prenatal care scale for people of color.发展以人为中心的有色人种产前护理量表。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Oct;225(4):427.e1-427.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.04.216. Epub 2021 Apr 20.