Jermander Emil, Sundkvist Jonas, Ekelund Jan, Möller Michael, Wolf Olof, Mukka Sebastian
Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences (Orthopedics), Umeå University, Sweden.
Centre of Registers Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Foot Ankle Surg. 2022 Dec;28(8):1444-1451. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2022.08.008. Epub 2022 Aug 20.
Epidemiological data on talus fractures from large nationwide and multicenter studies are rare. This study aims to describe the epidemiology, fracture classification and treatment regimens of talus fractures in a large adult Swedish population.
This observational study is based on data from the Swedish Fracture Register (SFR) including talar fractures in patients ≥18 with a sustained fracture between 2012 and 2021. Epidemiological data on sex, age, injury date, injury mechanism and type (high or low energy trauma), fracture classification (side, type), initial treatment and mortality were analysed.
We included 1794 talus fractures (1757 patients, 60 % men). Mean age was 40.3 years (range 18-96), and a biphasic age distribution was seen in women. High-energy trauma caused 33 % of all talus fractures. Of all talus fractures, 817 (45.5 %) were classified as AO/OTA type A fractures (avulsion), 370 (20.6 %) as type B (neck) and 435 (24.2 %) as type C (body). The remaining 172 (9.6 %) talus fractures were not classified/unclassifiable. Men were in the majority in all fracture groups except A1. For type A1-3, B1 and C1-2 fractures, most patients were treated non-operatively; in B2-3 and C3 fractures most patients received operative management. Fracture fixation with screws was the dominating surgical treatment. The overall 30-day mortality was 0.2 %.
Talus fractures are most commonly encountered in young and middle-aged men. In contrast to men, a biphasic age distribution was observed in women. Approximately half of the talus fractures are avulsions. Operative treatment, mostly screw fixation, is performed in more complex fracture configurations (B2, B3 and C3 fractures).
IV, retrospective observational cohort study.
来自大型全国性和多中心研究的距骨骨折流行病学数据很少。本研究旨在描述瑞典成年人群中距骨骨折的流行病学、骨折分类和治疗方案。
这项观察性研究基于瑞典骨折登记处(SFR)的数据,包括2012年至2021年间18岁及以上持续骨折患者的距骨骨折。分析了性别、年龄、受伤日期、受伤机制和类型(高能量或低能量创伤)、骨折分类(部位、类型)、初始治疗和死亡率等流行病学数据。
我们纳入了1794例距骨骨折(1757例患者,60%为男性)。平均年龄为40.3岁(范围18 - 96岁),女性呈现双相年龄分布。高能量创伤导致所有距骨骨折的33%。在所有距骨骨折中,817例(45.5%)被分类为AO/OTA A型骨折(撕脱性),370例(20.6%)为B型(颈部),435例(24.2%)为C型(体部)。其余172例(9.6%)距骨骨折未分类/无法分类。除A1型外,所有骨折组中男性占多数。对于A1 - 3型、B1型和C1 - 2型骨折,大多数患者接受非手术治疗;在B2 - 3型和C3型骨折中,大多数患者接受手术治疗。螺钉固定是主要的手术治疗方式。总体30天死亡率为0.2%。
距骨骨折最常见于中青年男性。与男性不同,女性呈现双相年龄分布。大约一半的距骨骨折为撕脱性骨折。在更复杂的骨折类型(B2型、B3型和C3型骨折)中采用手术治疗,主要是螺钉固定。
IV级,回顾性观察队列研究。