Gioia Ayla N, Forrest Lauren N, Smith April R
Department of Psychology, Hofstra University, Hempstead, New York, USA.
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA.
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2022 Dec;52(6):1205-1216. doi: 10.1111/sltb.12915. Epub 2022 Aug 27.
Self-injurious thoughts and behaviors (SITBs) are difficult to predict, and novel risk factors must be identified. While diminished interoception is associated with SITBs cross-sectionally, the current study assesses whether multiple measures of interoception predict future SITBs.
Adults (N = 43) with recent SITBs completed assessments of interoception during a baseline visit. Participants then completed biweekly assessments for 6 months in which they reported the presence and severity/frequency of suicidal ideation and nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI).
Multilevel models were performed, where baseline interoceptive measures predicted presence and severity/frequency of suicidal ideation and NSSI at follow-up. The Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA) Trusting subscale was the only significant predictor of the presence/severity of suicidal ideation. The MAIA Trusting, Emotional Awareness, and Body Listening subscales significantly predicted the presence of NSSI. The MAIA Emotional Awareness subscale and the Body Perception Questionnaire significantly predicted NSSI frequency.
Diminished body trust predicted both suicidal ideation and NSSI, indicating a potential shared risk pathway. However, two interoception measures (Body Listening subscale and Body Perception Questionnaire) were associated with NSSI only, indicating potentially unique risk pathways. Given the differential associations between interoception measures and SITBs, results highlight the importance of clearly defining how interoception is measured.
自伤性想法和行为(SITB)难以预测,必须识别新的风险因素。虽然内感受减退与SITB存在横断面关联,但本研究评估多种内感受测量方法是否能预测未来的SITB。
近期有SITB的成年人(N = 43)在基线访视期间完成内感受评估。参与者随后进行了为期6个月的双周评估,报告自杀意念和非自杀性自伤(NSSI)的存在情况及严重程度/频率。
进行了多层次模型分析,其中基线内感受测量方法可预测随访时自杀意念和NSSI的存在情况及严重程度/频率。内感受觉知多维评估(MAIA)的信任子量表是自杀意念存在/严重程度的唯一显著预测因素。MAIA的信任、情绪觉知和身体倾听子量表显著预测了NSSI的存在情况。MAIA情绪觉知子量表和身体感知问卷显著预测了NSSI的频率。
身体信任降低可预测自杀意念和NSSI,表明存在潜在的共同风险途径。然而,两种内感受测量方法(身体倾听子量表和身体感知问卷)仅与NSSI相关,表明可能存在独特的风险途径。鉴于内感受测量方法与SITB之间的差异关联,结果凸显了明确界定内感受测量方式的重要性。