Suppr超能文献

伴有严重颈部轴性疼痛的脊髓型颈椎病:前路还是后路手术更好?

Cervical spondylotic myelopathy with severe axial neck pain: is anterior or posterior approach better?

作者信息

Chan Andrew K, Shaffrey Christopher I, Gottfried Oren N, Park Christine, Than Khoi D, Bisson Erica F, Bydon Mohamad, Asher Anthony L, Coric Domagoj, Potts Eric A, Foley Kevin T, Wang Michael Y, Fu Kai-Ming, Virk Michael S, Knightly John J, Meyer Scott, Park Paul, Upadhyaya Cheerag, Shaffrey Mark E, Buchholz Avery L, Tumialán Luis M, Turner Jay D, Michalopoulos Giorgos D, Sherrod Brandon A, Agarwal Nitin, Chou Dean, Haid Regis W, Mummaneni Praveen V

机构信息

1Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.

2Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.

出版信息

J Neurosurg Spine. 2022 Aug 26;38(1):42-55. doi: 10.3171/2022.6.SPINE22110. Print 2023 Jan 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine whether multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) or posterior cervical laminectomy and fusion (PCLF) is superior for patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) and high preoperative neck pain.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of prospectively collected data using the Quality Outcomes Database (QOD) CSM module. Patients who received a subaxial fusion of 3 or 4 segments and had a visual analog scale (VAS) neck pain score of 7 or greater at baseline were included. The 3-, 12-, and 24-month outcomes were compared for patients undergoing ACDF with those undergoing PCLF.

RESULTS

Overall, 1141 patients with CSM were included in the database. Of these, 495 (43.4%) presented with severe neck pain (VAS score > 6). After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, we compared 65 patients (54.6%) undergoing 3- and 4-level ACDF and 54 patients (45.4%) undergoing 3- and 4-level PCLF. Patients undergoing ACDF had worse Neck Disability Index scores at baseline (52.5 ± 15.9 vs 45.9 ± 16.8, p = 0.03) but similar neck pain (p > 0.05). Otherwise, the groups were well matched for the remaining baseline patient-reported outcomes. The rates of 24-month follow-up for ACDF and PCLF were similar (86.2% and 83.3%, respectively). At the 24-month follow-up, both groups demonstrated mean improvements in all outcomes, including neck pain (p < 0.05). In multivariable analyses, there was no significant difference in the degree of neck pain change, rate of neck pain improvement, rate of pain-free achievement, and rate of reaching minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in neck pain between the two groups (adjusted p > 0.05). However, ACDF was associated with a higher 24-month modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scale (mJOA) score (β = 1.5 [95% CI 0.5-2.6], adjusted p = 0.01), higher EQ-5D score (β = 0.1 [95% CI 0.01-0.2], adjusted p = 0.04), and higher likelihood for return to baseline activities (OR 1.2 [95% CI 1.1-1.4], adjusted p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Severe neck pain is prevalent among patients undergoing surgery for CSM, affecting more than 40% of patients. Both ACDF and PCLF achieved comparable postoperative neck pain improvement 3, 12, and 24 months following 3- or 4-segment surgery for patients with CSM and severe neck pain. However, multilevel ACDF was associated with superior functional status, quality of life, and return to baseline activities at 24 months in multivariable adjusted analyses.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定多节段颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)或颈椎后路椎板切除融合术(PCLF)对患有脊髓型颈椎病(CSM)且术前颈部疼痛严重的患者是否更具优势。

方法

这是一项使用质量结果数据库(QOD)CSM模块对前瞻性收集的数据进行的回顾性研究。纳入接受3或4节段下颈椎融合术且基线时视觉模拟量表(VAS)颈部疼痛评分≥7分的患者。比较接受ACDF的患者与接受PCLF的患者在3个月、12个月和24个月时的结果。

结果

总体而言,数据库中纳入了1141例CSM患者。其中,495例(43.4%)有严重颈部疼痛(VAS评分>6)。应用纳入和排除标准后,我们比较了65例(54.6%)接受3和4节段ACDF的患者与54例(45.4%)接受3和4节段PCLF的患者。接受ACDF的患者在基线时颈部残疾指数评分更差(52.5±15.9对45.9±16.8,p = 0.03),但颈部疼痛相似(p>0.05)。此外,两组在其余基线患者报告的结果方面匹配良好。ACDF和PCLF的24个月随访率相似(分别为86.2%和83.3%)。在24个月随访时,两组在所有结果方面均显示出平均改善,包括颈部疼痛(p<0.05)。在多变量分析中,两组之间颈部疼痛变化程度、颈部疼痛改善率、无痛达成率以及颈部疼痛达到最小临床重要差异(MCID)率均无显著差异(校正p>0.05)。然而,ACDF与更高的24个月改良日本骨科协会量表(mJOA)评分相关(β = 1.5 [95%CI 0.5 - 2.6],校正p = 0.01),更高的EQ - 5D评分(β = 0.1 [95%CI 0.01 - 0.2],校正p = 0.04),以及更高的恢复至基线活动可能性(OR 1.2 [95%CI 1.1 - 1.4],校正p = 0.002)。

结论

严重颈部疼痛在接受CSM手术的患者中普遍存在,影响超过40%的患者。对于患有CSM和严重颈部疼痛的患者,在3或4节段手术后3个月、12个月和24个月时,ACDF和PCLF术后颈部疼痛改善程度相当。然而,在多变量调整分析中,多节段ACDF在24个月时与更好的功能状态、生活质量和恢复至基线活动相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验