Arbor Research Collaborative for Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Australasian Kidney Trials Network, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2023 Jan 23;38(1):193-202. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfac249.
While high serum phosphorus levels have been related to adverse outcomes in hemodialysis patients, further investigation is warranted in persons receiving peritoneal dialysis (PD).
Longitudinal data (2014-17) from the Peritoneal Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (PDOPPS), a prospective cohort study, were used to examine associations of serum phosphorus with all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events via Cox regression adjusted for confounders. Serum phosphorus levels were parameterized by four methods: (i) baseline serum phosphorus; (ii) mean 6-month serum phosphorus; (iii) number of months with serum phosphorus >4.5 mg/dL; and (iv) mean area-under-the-curve of 6-month serum phosphorus control.
The study included 5847 PD patients from seven countries; 9% of patients had baseline serum phosphorus <3.5 mg/dL, 24% had serum phosphorus ≥3.5 to ≤4.5 mg/dL, 30% had serum phosphorus >4.5 to <5.5 mg/dL, 20% had serum phosphorus ≥5.5 to <6.5 mg/dL, and 17% had serum phosphorus ≥6.5 mg/dL. Compared with patients with baseline serum phosphorus ≥3.5 to ≤4.5 mg/dL, the adjusted all-cause mortality hazard ratio (HR) was 1.19 (0.92,1.53) for patients with baseline serum phosphorus ≥5.5 to <6.5 mg/dL and HR was 1.53 (1.14,2.05) for serum phosphorus ≥6.5 mg/dL. Associations between serum phosphorus measurements over 6 months and clinical outcomes were even stronger than for a single measurement.
Serum phosphorus >5.5 mg/dL was highly prevalent (37%) in PD patients, and higher serum phosphorus levels were a strong predictor of morbidity and death, particularly when considering serial phosphorus measurements. This highlights the need for improved treatment strategies in this population. Serial serum phosphorus measurements should be considered when assessing patients' risks of adverse outcomes.
虽然高血清磷水平与血液透析患者的不良结局有关,但在接受腹膜透析(PD)的人群中还需要进一步研究。
使用前瞻性队列研究腹膜透析结局和实践模式研究(PDOPPS)的纵向数据(2014-17 年),通过 Cox 回归调整混杂因素,检查血清磷与全因死亡率和主要不良心血管事件的相关性。血清磷水平通过以下四种方法进行参数化:(i)基线血清磷;(ii)6 个月平均血清磷;(iii)血清磷>4.5mg/dL 的月数;(iv)6 个月血清磷控制的平均曲线下面积。
本研究纳入了来自 7 个国家的 5847 名 PD 患者;9%的患者基线血清磷<3.5mg/dL,24%的患者血清磷≥3.5 至≤4.5mg/dL,30%的患者血清磷>4.5 至<5.5mg/dL,20%的患者血清磷≥5.5 至<6.5mg/dL,17%的患者血清磷≥6.5mg/dL。与基线血清磷≥3.5 至≤4.5mg/dL 的患者相比,基线血清磷≥5.5 至<6.5mg/dL 的患者的全因死亡率调整危险比(HR)为 1.19(0.92,1.53),而血清磷≥6.5mg/dL 的 HR 为 1.53(1.14,2.05)。6 个月内血清磷测量与临床结局之间的关联甚至强于单次测量。
PD 患者的血清磷>5.5mg/dL (37%)非常普遍,较高的血清磷水平是发病率和死亡率的强有力预测因素,尤其是考虑到连续的磷测量时。这突出表明需要在该人群中制定更好的治疗策略。在评估患者不良结局风险时,应考虑连续的血清磷测量。