• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

领先的风湿病学期刊系统评价中对文献检索报告指南的遵循情况:伞状综述方案

Adherence to literature search reporting guidelines in leading rheumatology journals' systematic reviews: umbrella review protocol.

作者信息

Pérez-Neri Iván, Pineda Carlos, Flores-Guerrero Jose L, Estêvão M Dulce, Vasanthan Lenny T, Lorente Sonia, García-González Renato, Devulapalli Vighnesh, Weerasekara Ishanka, de Aguiar Débora Regina, Barros-Sevillano Shamir, Le Long Khanh-Dao, Sandoval Hugo

机构信息

Department of Neurochemistry, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery Manuel Velasco Suárez, Insurgentes Sur 3877; La Fama, Tlalpan., Ciudad de México, 14269, México.

General Directorate, National Institute of Rehabilitation Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra, Calzada Mexico- Xochimilco 289; Arenal de Guadalupe, Ciudad de México, 14389, México.

出版信息

Rheumatol Int. 2022 Dec;42(12):2135-2140. doi: 10.1007/s00296-022-05194-1. Epub 2022 Aug 27.

DOI:10.1007/s00296-022-05194-1
PMID:36029320
Abstract

Literature searches are important components of systematic reviews. They are not only informative of the retrieval process, but they also set the data to be analyzed and influence additional components of systematic reviews. Despite the available guidelines, several studies have shown that the quality of reporting in systematic reviews is deficient in several medical fields. Systematic reviews may not comply completely with those guidelines despite explicitly stating they do. This protocol intends to answer to what extent systematic reviews published in rheumatology journals have complied with the PRISMA's search strategy guidelines published in 2009. The objective of the study is to analyze the compliance with the PRISMA (2009) search strategy guidelines among systematic reviews published in leading rheumatology journals. Inclusion criteria for this umbrella review protocol are systematic reviews (with or without meta-analyses) that mention having followed the PRISMA statement (2009) in their methods section, and published in journals listed in the Rheumatology category of the Journal of Citations Report 2020. Exclusion criteria are articles published before 2009; retraction letters, notes, expressions of concern; systematic reviews using PRISMA 2020. Databases to be consulted are Web of Science, PubMed and Scopus, from inception to present. Data summaries will be presented in graphs, figures, tables and network maps. A narrative synthesis will be described. This protocol complies with guidelines such as PRISMA 2020, PRISMA-A, PRISMA-P, PRISMA-S, PRESS, and JBI Manual for evidence synthesis, as long as it is suitable for umbrella review protocols. Articles in any language will be considered.

摘要

文献检索是系统评价的重要组成部分。它们不仅能提供检索过程的信息,还能确定要分析的数据,并影响系统评价的其他组成部分。尽管有可用的指南,但多项研究表明,在几个医学领域,系统评价的报告质量存在缺陷。系统评价可能并未完全遵守这些指南,尽管它们明确表示遵守了。本方案旨在回答发表在风湿病学杂志上的系统评价在多大程度上符合2009年发布的PRISMA检索策略指南。该研究的目的是分析发表在主要风湿病学杂志上的系统评价对PRISMA(2009)检索策略指南的遵守情况。本综合评价方案的纳入标准是在方法部分提及遵循PRISMA声明(2009)的系统评价(无论是否有荟萃分析),并发表在《2020年期刊引证报告》风湿病学类别所列的期刊上。排除标准是2009年之前发表的文章;撤稿信、注释、关注声明;使用PRISMA 2020的系统评价。将检索的数据库是Web of Science、PubMed和Scopus,从创建至今。数据总结将以图表、图形、表格和网络图的形式呈现。将进行叙述性综合。本方案符合PRISMA 2020、PRISMA-A、PRISMA-P、PRISMA-S、PRESS和JBI证据综合手册等指南,只要适用于综合评价方案即可。将考虑任何语言的文章。

相似文献

1
Adherence to literature search reporting guidelines in leading rheumatology journals' systematic reviews: umbrella review protocol.领先的风湿病学期刊系统评价中对文献检索报告指南的遵循情况:伞状综述方案
Rheumatol Int. 2022 Dec;42(12):2135-2140. doi: 10.1007/s00296-022-05194-1. Epub 2022 Aug 27.
2
Endorsement of PRISMA statement and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in nursing journals: a cross-sectional study.护理期刊发表的系统评价和荟萃分析对PRISMA声明的认可情况及质量:一项横断面研究
BMJ Open. 2017 Feb 7;7(2):e013905. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013905.
3
Compliance of systematic reviews articles in brain arteriovenous malformation with PRISMA statement guidelines: Review of literature.脑动静脉畸形系统评价文章对PRISMA声明指南的依从性:文献综述
J Clin Neurosci. 2017 May;39:45-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2017.02.016. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
4
Compliance of systematic reviews in veterinary journals with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) literature search reporting guidelines.兽医期刊中系统评价对系统评价与Meta分析优先报告条目(PRISMA)文献检索报告指南的遵循情况。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2017 Jul;105(3):233-239. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2017.246. Epub 2017 Jul 1.
5
From QUOROM to PRISMA: a survey of high-impact medical journals' instructions to authors and a review of systematic reviews in anesthesia literature.从 QUOROM 到 PRISMA:对高影响力医学期刊对作者的指导意见的调查,以及对麻醉文献中系统评价的综述。
PLoS One. 2011;6(11):e27611. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027611. Epub 2011 Nov 16.
6
Quality of reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in emergency medicine based on the PRISMA statement.基于PRISMA声明的急诊医学系统评价和Meta分析报告质量
BMC Emerg Med. 2019 Feb 11;19(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12873-019-0233-6.
7
Reporting and Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Nursing Interventions in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease: General Implications of the Findings.阿尔茨海默病患者护理干预的系统评价和荟萃分析的报告和方法学质量:研究结果的普遍意义。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2019 May;51(3):308-316. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12462. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
8
Quality of Literature Searches Published in Leading Neurosurgical Journals: A Review of Reviews.主要神经外科学杂志发表的文献检索质量:一篇综述的综述。
Neurosurgery. 2021 Apr 15;88(5):891-899. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa573.
9
Evaluation of the endorsement of the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement on the quality of published systematic review and meta-analyses.评价发表的系统评价和荟萃分析的质量对首选报告项目的系统评价和荟萃分析 (PRISMA) 声明的认可。
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 26;8(12):e83138. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083138. eCollection 2013.
10
Compliance of systematic reviews in ophthalmology with the PRISMA statement.眼科系统评价与 PRISMA 声明的一致性。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Dec 28;17(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0450-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Best practices of judicial governance: A scoping review protocol.司法治理的最佳实践:一项范围综述方案。
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 28;20(8):e0329904. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329904. eCollection 2025.
2
Interventions on Barriers to the Participation of Adolescents in Physical Activity: A Systematic Review.青少年参与体育活动的障碍干预措施:一项系统综述
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 May 31;22(6):881. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22060881.
3
Effects of energy drinks on mental health and academic performance of university students: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.

本文引用的文献

1
The ocular surface, coronaviruses and COVID-19.眼表、冠状病毒与2019冠状病毒病
Clin Exp Optom. 2020 Jul;103(4):418-424. doi: 10.1111/cxo.13088. Epub 2020 May 13.
2
Poor Quality in Systematic Reviews on PTSD and EMDR - An Examination of Search Methodology and Reporting.创伤后应激障碍和眼动脱敏再处理系统评价的质量欠佳——检索方法与报告情况考察
Front Psychol. 2019 Jul 9;10:1558. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01558. eCollection 2019.
3
Reporting and Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Nursing Interventions in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease: General Implications of the Findings.
能量饮料对大学生心理健康和学业成绩的影响:一项系统评价与荟萃分析方案
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 12;20(3):e0319533. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319533. eCollection 2025.
4
Prevalence and factors associated with the perpetration and victimization of teen dating violence: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.青少年约会暴力的发生率及其实施与受害相关因素:一项系统评价和荟萃分析方案
MethodsX. 2024 Oct 10;13:103003. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2024.103003. eCollection 2024 Dec.
5
Factors influencing the work of researchers in Scientific Initiation: A systematic review protocol.影响科研启动阶段研究人员工作的因素:系统评价方案
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 31;19(1):e0297186. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297186. eCollection 2024.
6
Administrative professionals' quality of life in educational institutions: a systematic review protocol.教育机构行政专业人员的生活质量:系统评价方案
BMJ Open. 2023 Aug 9;13(8):e074119. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074119.
7
Interventions towards barriers to the practice of physical activity in adolescence: A systematic review protocol.干预青少年身体活动实践障碍的措施:系统评价方案。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 12;18(7):e0287868. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287868. eCollection 2023.
阿尔茨海默病患者护理干预的系统评价和荟萃分析的报告和方法学质量:研究结果的普遍意义。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2019 May;51(3):308-316. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12462. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
4
Improving the quality of reporting of systematic reviews of dose-response meta-analyses: a cross-sectional survey.提高剂量反应荟萃分析系统评价报告质量的方法:横断面调查。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Nov 29;18(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0623-6.
5
Compliance of systematic reviews in veterinary journals with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) literature search reporting guidelines.兽医期刊中系统评价对系统评价与Meta分析优先报告条目(PRISMA)文献检索报告指南的遵循情况。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2017 Jul;105(3):233-239. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2017.246. Epub 2017 Jul 1.
6
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.系统评价与Meta分析的首选报告项目:PRISMA声明。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Oct;62(10):1006-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005. Epub 2009 Jul 23.