Suppr超能文献

教育机构行政专业人员的生活质量:系统评价方案

Administrative professionals' quality of life in educational institutions: a systematic review protocol.

机构信息

Instituto Federal Goiano - Campus Ceres, Ceres, Goiás, Brazil

Instituto Federal de Goiás - Campus Uruaçu, Uruaçu, Goiás, Brazil.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2023 Aug 9;13(8):e074119. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074119.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Indicators of administrative professionals' quality of life (QoL) in educational institutions are essential for planning improvements in their daily lives. QoL is a recurring topic in academic research, particularly in the healthcare sector. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the perceptions of administrative professionals in educational institutions regarding their QoL and the implications of remote and in-person work. Additionally, we aim to compare the QoL before, during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Five electronic databases will be searched for this systematic review: CINAHL, LILACS, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science. Original, peer-reviewed articles published in any language, without time limitations, will be included in this study. Two researchers will screen the articles and extract the data. The included articles will be evaluated for the quality of their evidence using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations. The risk of bias will be assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist and the Downs and Black scale. A third reviewer will resolve any discrepancies.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The systematic review results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at a relevant conference. The data will not include individual patient data; therefore, ethical approval is not required.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022365862.

摘要

简介

教育机构行政专业人员生活质量(QoL)的指标对于规划改善他们的日常生活至关重要。QoL 是学术研究中的一个常见话题,特别是在医疗保健领域。因此,本研究旨在评估教育机构行政专业人员对其 QoL 的看法,以及远程和现场工作的影响。此外,我们旨在比较 COVID-19 大流行前后的 QoL。

方法和分析

本系统评价将在五个电子数据库中搜索:CINAHL、LILACS、PubMed、Scopus 和 Web of Science。本研究将纳入任何语言发表的、无时间限制的原始同行评审文章。两名研究人员将筛选文章并提取数据。使用推荐、评估、发展和评估分级法评估纳入文章的证据质量。使用批判性评估技能计划清单和唐斯和布莱克量表评估偏倚风险。第三名评审员将解决任何分歧。

伦理和传播

系统评价结果将发表在同行评审期刊上,并在相关会议上展示。该数据不包括个体患者数据,因此不需要伦理批准。

PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42022365862。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8297/10414068/32c98667c749/bmjopen-2023-074119f01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验