Cognitive Neurophysiology, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden, Germany; University Neuropsychology Center, Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden, Germany.
Cognitive Neurophysiology, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden, Germany; University Neuropsychology Center, Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden, Germany; Biopsychology, Faculty of Psychology, School of Science, TU Dresden, Germany.
Cortex. 2022 Oct;155:202-217. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2022.07.004. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
Goal-directed behavior often requires the inhibition of prepotent automatic responses. Response inhibition encompasses several top-down cognitive operations embedded in a neural network extending from fronto-cortical regions to subcortical nuclei. Yet, it has remained unclear whether the early allocation of cognitive resources also modulates response inhibition performance and neural structures involved in this process. To investigate this question, we used a Simon Nogo task, which was designed to manipulate the relationship between automaticity and cognitive control during response inhibition, and combined it with an electroencephalogram (EEG) and source localization approach. We showed that the early allocation of cognitive resources, as reflected by the P2 amplitude, might be a critical determinant in the interplay between automaticity and cognitive control in response inhibition. Specifically, the obtained results demonstrated that individual variations in cognitive resource allocation modulated the need for conflict monitoring and engagement in cognitive control processes, as reflected by N2 and P3b amplitudes, respectively. Importantly, larger P2 amplitudes were associated with higher activation in cortical regions encompassing the temporo-parietal junction (TPJ). This stresses the importance of this cortical region for the encoding of relevant stimulus information to resolve conflicting contexts in response inhibition. The increased cognitive control in more automatic contexts was also reflected by higher activation of the superior and medial frontal cortices. These findings provide a new perspective on response inhibition, suggesting that early resource allocation is a central modulator of the interaction between automaticity and cognitive control.
目标导向行为通常需要抑制优势自动反应。反应抑制包括几个自上而下的认知操作,嵌入从额皮质区域延伸到皮质下核团的神经网络中。然而,早期认知资源的分配是否也调节反应抑制性能以及涉及该过程的神经结构仍不清楚。为了研究这个问题,我们使用了 Simon Nogo 任务,该任务旨在在反应抑制期间操纵自动性和认知控制之间的关系,并结合脑电图 (EEG) 和源定位方法。我们表明,由 P2 振幅反映的认知资源的早期分配可能是反应抑制中自动性和认知控制相互作用的关键决定因素。具体而言,获得的结果表明,认知资源分配的个体差异调节了冲突监测和参与认知控制过程的需求,分别反映在 N2 和 P3b 振幅上。重要的是,较大的 P2 振幅与包括颞顶联合区 (TPJ) 的皮质区域的更高激活相关。这强调了该皮质区域对于编码相关刺激信息以解决反应抑制中冲突上下文的重要性。在更自动的情况下,认知控制的增加也反映在更高的上额和内侧额皮质的激活上。这些发现为反应抑制提供了新的视角,表明早期资源分配是自动性和认知控制相互作用的核心调节剂。