Suppr超能文献

丘脑和苍白球联合深部脑刺激治疗肌张力障碍性震颤。

Combined thalamic and pallidal deep brain stimulation for dystonic tremor.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.

Department of Neurology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.

出版信息

Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2022 Oct;103:29-33. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2022.08.003. Epub 2022 Aug 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been proposed to treat disabling dystonic tremor (DT), but there is debate about the optimal target. DBS of the globus pallidus interna (GPi) may be insufficient to control tremor, and DBS of the ventral intermediate thalamic nucleus (VIM) may inadequately control dystonic features, raising the question of combining both targets.

OBJECTIVES

To report the respective effects on DT symptoms of high-frequency stimulation of the VIM, the GPi and both targets simultaneously stimulated.

METHODS

Three patients with DT treated by bilateral high frequency DBS of 2 targets (VIM and GPi) were assessed 12 months after surgery in 4 conditions (VIM and GPi-DBS; GPi-DBS only; VIM-DBS only; DBS switched Off for both targets) by 3 independent movement disorders specialists blinded to the condition.

RESULTS

The Fahn-Tolosa-Marin-tremor-rating-scale (FTM-TRS) and Burke-Fahn-Marsden-dystonia-rating-scale (BFM-DRS) scores were more improved by combined DBS than VIM alone or GPi alone. Compared to Off/Off condition, mean total FTM-TRS score decrease was 34%, 42% and 63% respectively with VIM only, GPi only and combined VIM and GPi stimulation. Mean total BFM-DRS score decrease was 34%, 37% and 60% respectively with VIM only, GPi only and combined VIM and GPi stimulation, compared to Off/Off condition. Improvement concerned both motor, functional and activities of daily living sub-scores. No complications or adverse events were observed.

CONCLUSION

Combined VIM- and GPi-DBS, by modulating the cerebello-thalamo-cortical network and the basal ganglia-thalamo-cortical network, both involved in DT pathophysiology, may be more efficient than single DBS targeting only one of them.

摘要

背景

深部脑刺激(DBS)已被提议用于治疗致残性肌张力障碍性震颤(DT),但对于最佳靶区仍存在争议。苍白球内侧部(GPi)的 DBS 可能不足以控制震颤,而腹侧中间丘脑核(VIM)的 DBS 可能不足以控制肌张力障碍特征,这引发了同时刺激这两个靶区的问题。

目的

报告 VIM、GPi 和同时刺激这两个靶区的高频刺激对 DT 症状的各自影响。

方法

对 3 例接受双侧高频率 DBS 治疗的 DT 患者进行评估,术后 12 个月,在 4 种情况下(VIM 和 GPi-DBS;仅 GPi-DBS;仅 VIM-DBS;同时关闭两个靶区的 DBS),由 3 位独立的运动障碍专家进行评估,这些专家对条件不知情。

结果

与 VIM 单独或 GPi 单独刺激相比,联合 DBS 更能改善 Fahn-Tolosa-Marin 震颤评定量表(FTM-TRS)和 Burke-Fahn-Marsden 肌张力障碍评定量表(BFM-DRS)评分。与 Off/Off 状态相比,仅 VIM、仅 GPi 和联合 VIM 和 GPi 刺激时,平均总 FTM-TRS 评分分别降低 34%、42%和 63%。仅 VIM、仅 GPi 和联合 VIM 和 GPi 刺激时,平均总 BFM-DRS 评分分别降低 34%、37%和 60%,与 Off/Off 状态相比。改善涉及运动、功能和日常生活活动的子评分。未观察到并发症或不良事件。

结论

通过调节涉及 DT 病理生理学的小脑-丘脑-皮质网络和基底节-丘脑-皮质网络,联合 VIM 和 GPi-DBS 可能比仅针对其中一个靶点的单 DBS 更有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验