Centre for Human Brain Health, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK; Institute for Mental Health, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK; Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Anna Watts Building, Woodstock Road, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK; Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, FMRIB Building, Headington, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK; Christ Church, University of Oxford, St Aldate's, Oxford OX1 1DP, UK.
Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Anna Watts Building, Woodstock Road, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK; Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, FMRIB Building, Headington, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK; Department of Experimental Psychology, University College London, 26 Bedford Way, London WC1H 0AP, UK; Max Planck UCL Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, University College London, Russell Square House 10-12 Russell Square, London WC1B 5EH, UK.
Curr Biol. 2022 Oct 10;32(19):4172-4185.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2022.08.010. Epub 2022 Aug 26.
Prosocial behaviors-actions that benefit others-are central to individual and societal well-being. Although the mechanisms underlying the financial and moral costs of prosocial behaviors are increasingly understood, this work has often ignored a key influence on behavior: effort. Many prosocial acts are effortful, and people are averse to the costs of exerting them. However, how the brain encodes effort costs when actions benefit others is unknown. During fMRI, participants completed a decision-making task where they chose in each trial whether to "work" and exert force (30%-70% of maximum grip strength) or "rest" (no effort) for rewards (2-10 credits). Crucially, on separate trials, they made these decisions either to benefit another person or themselves. We used a combination of multivariate representational similarity analysis and model-based univariate analysis to reveal how the costs of prosocial and self-benefiting efforts are processed. Strikingly, we identified a unique neural signature of effort in the anterior cingulate gyrus (ACCg) for prosocial acts, both when choosing to help others and when exerting force to benefit them. This pattern was absent for self-benefiting behaviors. Moreover, stronger, specific representations of prosocial effort in the ACCg were linked to higher levels of empathy and higher subsequent exerted force to benefit others. In contrast, the ventral tegmental area and ventral insula represented value preferentially when choosing for oneself and not for prosocial acts. These findings advance our understanding of the neural mechanisms of prosocial behavior, highlighting the critical role that effort has in the brain circuits that guide helping others.
亲社会行为——有益于他人的行为——是个人和社会福祉的核心。尽管越来越多的人了解了亲社会行为的经济和道德成本的机制,但这项工作往往忽略了对行为的一个关键影响:努力。许多亲社会行为是费力的,人们不愿意付出这些努力的代价。然而,当行为有益于他人时,大脑如何编码努力成本是未知的。在 fMRI 期间,参与者完成了一项决策任务,在每次试验中,他们选择是“工作”并施加力(最大握力的 30%-70%)还是“休息”(不费力)以获得奖励(2-10 个学分)。至关重要的是,在单独的试验中,他们做出这些决策是为了使另一个人或自己受益。我们使用多元代表性相似性分析和基于模型的单变量分析的组合来揭示亲社会和自我受益努力的成本是如何被处理的。引人注目的是,我们在额前扣带皮层(ACCg)中发现了亲社会行为的努力的独特神经特征,无论是在选择帮助他人还是在施加力量以帮助他们时。这种模式在自我受益行为中不存在。此外,ACCg 中亲社会努力的更强、更具体的表示与更高水平的同理心和随后为帮助他人而施加的更高力量有关。相比之下,腹侧被盖区和腹侧脑岛在为自己而不是为亲社会行为选择时优先代表价值。这些发现推进了我们对亲社会行为的神经机制的理解,突出了努力在指导帮助他人的大脑回路中所起的关键作用。