Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Division of Cardiology, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA.
J Vasc Surg. 2023 Jan;77(1):158-169.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.08.019. Epub 2022 Aug 25.
Statin therapy is the standard of care for patients with carotid artery stenosis given its proven cardiovascular benefits. However, the impact of statin therapy on outcomes in patients undergoing carotid revascularization in the Vascular Quality Initiative has not yet been evaluated. Therefore, our aim was to investigate the association of statin therapy with outcomes following carotid endarterectomy (CEA), transfemoral carotid artery stenting (tfCAS), and transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR).
We identified all patients who underwent CEA, tfCAS, or TCAR in the Vascular Quality Initiative registry from January 2016 to September 2021. To compare outcomes, we stratified patients by procedure type and created 1:1 propensity score-matched cohorts of patients who received no preoperative statin therapy (within 36 hours of procedure) versus those who received preoperative statin therapy. Propensity scores incorporated demographic characteristics, comorbidities, carotid symptom status, preoperative medications, and physician and hospital procedural experience. The primary outcome was a composite end point of in-hospital stroke and/or death. As a secondary analysis, we performed repeat propensity score-matching by postoperative statin use (prescribed at discharge) and assessed 5-year mortality. Relative risks (RR) and hazard ratios (HR) were calculated using log binomial regression and Cox regression, respectively.
Among 97,835 CEA, 20,303 tfCAS, and 22,371 TCAR patients, 15%, 17%, and 10% of patients did not receive preoperative statin therapy, respectively. Compared with statin use, no statin use was associated with a higher risk of in-hospital stroke or death among 13,434 matched CEA patients (no statin, 1.7% vs statin, 1.4%; RR, 1.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.5) and among 2707 matched tfCAS patients (4.8% vs 2.8%; RR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.3-2.3). However, there was no difference for this outcome by statin use among 2089 matched TCAR patients (1.8% vs 1.6%; RR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.7-1.8). At 5 years, no statin therapy at discharge was associated with higher 5-year mortality after CEA (15% vs 10%; HR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.6-2) and tfCAS (18% vs 14%; HR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.2-1.8), but there was no difference after TCAR (14% vs 11%; HR, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.9-1.8).
Compared with statin use, no statin use was associated with a higher risk of in-hospital stroke or death and 5-year mortality among CEA and tfCAS patients. Although there was no significant difference in outcomes among TCAR patients, this may in part be due to lower statistical power in this cohort. Overall, statin therapy is essential in the short- and long-term management of patients undergoing carotid revascularization. Our findings not only support current Society for Vascular Surgery recommendations for statin therapy in patients undergoing carotid revascularization, but they also highlight an important opportunity for quality improvement.
鉴于他汀类药物治疗在心血管方面的益处已得到证实,因此其已成为颈动脉狭窄患者的标准治疗方法。然而,血管质量倡议(Vascular Quality Initiative)中颈动脉血运重建患者接受他汀类药物治疗的效果尚未得到评估。因此,我们旨在研究他汀类药物治疗与颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)、经股动脉颈动脉支架置入术(tfCAS)和经颈动脉血运重建术(TCAR)后结局之间的关系。
我们从 2016 年 1 月至 2021 年 9 月在血管质量倡议登记处中确定了所有接受 CEA、tfCAS 或 TCAR 的患者。为了进行结果比较,我们根据手术类型对患者进行分层,并创建了 1:1 的倾向评分匹配队列,分别比较了未接受术前他汀类药物治疗(术前 36 小时内)与接受术前他汀类药物治疗的患者。倾向评分纳入了人口统计学特征、合并症、颈动脉症状状态、术前用药以及医生和医院手术经验。主要终点是院内卒中加死亡的复合终点。作为二次分析,我们通过术后他汀类药物使用(出院时开具)再次进行倾向评分匹配,并评估了 5 年死亡率。使用对数二项回归和 Cox 回归分别计算相对风险(RR)和风险比(HR)。
在 97835 例 CEA、20303 例 tfCAS 和 22371 例 TCAR 患者中,分别有 15%、17%和 10%的患者未接受术前他汀类药物治疗。与他汀类药物治疗相比,在 13434 例匹配的 CEA 患者(无他汀类药物治疗组为 1.7%,他汀类药物治疗组为 1.4%;RR,1.2;95%置信区间[CI],1.02-1.5)和 2707 例匹配的 tfCAS 患者(无他汀类药物治疗组为 4.8%,他汀类药物治疗组为 2.8%;RR,1.7;95%CI,1.3-2.3)中,无他汀类药物治疗与院内卒中或死亡风险较高相关。然而,在 2089 例匹配的 TCAR 患者中,他汀类药物治疗与该结局之间无差异(无他汀类药物治疗组为 1.8%,他汀类药物治疗组为 1.6%;RR,1.1;95%CI,0.7-1.8)。在 5 年时,CEA 和 tfCAS 患者出院时未接受他汀类药物治疗与 5 年死亡率较高相关(无他汀类药物治疗组为 15%,他汀类药物治疗组为 10%;HR,1.8;95%CI,1.6-2.0)和 tfCAS(无他汀类药物治疗组为 18%,他汀类药物治疗组为 14%;HR,1.5;95%CI,1.2-1.8),但在 TCAR 患者中无差异(无他汀类药物治疗组为 14%,他汀类药物治疗组为 11%;HR,1.3;95%CI,0.9-1.8)。
与他汀类药物治疗相比,CEA 和 tfCAS 患者不使用他汀类药物治疗与院内卒中或死亡及 5 年死亡率较高相关。尽管 TCAR 患者的结局无显著差异,但这可能部分是由于该队列的统计效能较低。总体而言,他汀类药物治疗是颈动脉血运重建患者短期和长期管理的重要手段。我们的研究结果不仅支持当前血管外科学会关于颈动脉血运重建患者使用他汀类药物治疗的建议,而且还强调了提高质量的重要机会。