Dental Implant and Maxillofacial Center, Brånemark Osseointegration Center, Hong Kong; Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, the University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Dental Implant and Maxillofacial Center, Brånemark Osseointegration Center, Hong Kong; Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, the University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023 Mar;52(3):396-403. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2022.08.005. Epub 2022 Aug 24.
The aim of this study was to investigate the gingival thickness and biologic width in the aesthetic zone (maxillary central and lateral incisors) in an Asian population using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) as a non-invasive measurement method, prior to immediate implant placement. The gingival geometric ratio is introduced as a new parameter for assessing soft tissue stability and hence predicting the aesthetic outcome. The gingival thickness, biologic width category (normal, high, and low crest), and gingival geometric ratio (shape and configuration of the gingival tissues) were assessed for 171 central and 175 lateral incisors on high-resolution CBCT images. Thick gingivae were found in 93.6% of the central incisors and 64% of the lateral incisors (P < 0.001). The difference in thickness between the central and lateral incisors was statistically significant (P < 0.001). Regarding the biologic width of the facial gingival tissue, the majority of central (64.8%) and lateral (64.3%) incisors were categorized as low crest (>3 mm). The study found that most of the gingivae of the maxillary central incisors were thick, while thin gingivae were more prevalent in the lateral incisors. Therefore, an individual patient may have different gingival thickness types, and 'one individual, one gingival biotype' may not be true. Furthermore, the majority of the facial gingival tissues of the maxillary incisors were found to be low crest.
本研究旨在通过锥形束 CT(CBCT)作为一种非侵入性测量方法,研究亚洲人群美学区(上颌中切牙和侧切牙)的牙龈厚度和生物学宽度,以便在即刻植入前进行。引入牙龈几何比作为评估软组织稳定性的新参数,从而预测美学效果。在高分辨率 CBCT 图像上评估了 171 颗中切牙和 175 颗侧切牙的牙龈厚度、生物学宽度类别(正常、高和低嵴)和牙龈几何比(牙龈组织的形状和形态)。结果发现,93.6%的中切牙和 64%的侧切牙存在厚牙龈(P<0.001)。中切牙和侧切牙之间的厚度差异具有统计学意义(P<0.001)。关于颊侧牙龈组织的生物学宽度,大多数中切牙(64.8%)和侧切牙(64.3%)归类为低嵴(>3mm)。研究发现,上颌中切牙的大多数牙龈较厚,而侧切牙则较常见薄牙龈。因此,个体患者可能具有不同的牙龈厚度类型,“一个个体,一个牙龈生物型”可能并不准确。此外,上颌切牙的颊侧牙龈组织大部分为低嵴。