Pushparaj Hemkumar, Chawla Rajiv, Bhargava Deepti, Biswas Shubhabrata, Sharma Manohar L
Department of Pain Medicine, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Department of Neurosurgery, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Br J Pain. 2022 Aug;16(4):370-378. doi: 10.1177/20494637211062321. Epub 2021 Dec 19.
Wireless percutaneous nerve stimulation (PNS) for chronic pain is rapidly evolving in the ever expanding neuromodulation paradigm. Safety and lower risks with a potential of long-term analgesia cannot be over emphasised especially with the ongoing opioid pandemic. PNS with an implanted pulse generator (IPG) has also been shown to provide good benefit, without often unpleasant widespread paraesthesia from conventional spinal cord stimulators.
We retrospectively extracted data on all wireless PNS implants in our highly specialised pain neuromodulation centre since initiation of wireless PNS service in August 2019. Patient demographics, pain history, analgesic intake and details on implant follow-up data within 1 year post-implant including pain relief, EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) and Patients' Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scores were extracted. The cases are presented in a narrative format.
A total of five patients were implanted with wireless (Stimwave) PNS from August 2019 to February 2020. Neuropathic pain was the most common presenting diagnosis. All patients showed >50% pain relief at 3 months. EQ-5D and PGIC did not show any improvement in the subjects. Two of the patients managed to decrease their analgesics after implantation. Similar sustained benefits could not be demonstrated after 1 year.
PNS can provide analgesia in appropriately selected cases. Naivety of the technique and procedure might cause some degree of uncertainty. External pulse generator with wireless transmission avoids IPG and tunnelling related side effects, but requires individualised special wearable technology to power the lead. Minimally invasive nature of the technique might be attractive and preferable for patients with complex medical issues, nickel allergy and poor general health who may otherwise be unsuitable for Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) with conventional hardware. Robust prospective controlled studies and RCTs in future might provide further insights on utility in other neuropathic pain diagnosis, long-term outcomes and acceptability compared to conventional SCS.
在不断发展的神经调节模式中,用于慢性疼痛的无线经皮神经刺激(PNS)正在迅速发展。尤其是在当前阿片类药物泛滥的情况下,其安全性和较低风险以及长期镇痛的潜力再怎么强调都不为过。植入式脉冲发生器(IPG)的PNS也已显示出良好的效果,不会像传统脊髓刺激器那样经常产生令人不适的广泛感觉异常。
自2019年8月开展无线PNS服务以来,我们回顾性提取了我们高度专业化的疼痛神经调节中心所有无线PNS植入的数据。提取了患者的人口统计学信息、疼痛病史、镇痛药物使用情况以及植入后1年内的植入随访数据细节,包括疼痛缓解情况、欧洲五维健康量表(EQ - 5D)和患者整体变化印象(PGIC)评分。病例以叙述形式呈现。
2019年8月至2020年2月,共有5例患者植入了无线(Stimwave)PNS。神经性疼痛是最常见的诊断。所有患者在3个月时疼痛缓解均超过50%。EQ - 5D和PGIC在受试者中未显示出任何改善。其中2例患者在植入后设法减少了镇痛药物的使用。1年后未能证明有类似的持续益处。
PNS在适当选择的病例中可提供镇痛效果。该技术和操作的生疏可能会导致一定程度的不确定性。带有无线传输的外部脉冲发生器避免了与IPG和隧道相关的副作用,但需要个性化的特殊可穿戴技术为导线供电。该技术的微创性质对于那些有复杂医疗问题、对镍过敏且总体健康状况不佳、否则可能不适合使用传统硬件进行脊髓刺激(SCS)的患者可能具有吸引力且更可取。未来强有力的前瞻性对照研究和随机对照试验可能会提供关于其在其他神经性疼痛诊断中的效用、长期结果以及与传统SCS相比的可接受性的进一步见解。