Suppr超能文献

腰骶丛损伤的外科干预:一项系统评价

Surgical Interventions for Lumbosacral Plexus Injuries: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Nichols David Spencer, Fenton Jesse, Cox Elizabeth, Dang Jonathan, Garbuzov Anna, McCall-Wright Patti, Chim Harvey

机构信息

College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Fla.

Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Fla.

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022 Aug 24;10(8):e4436. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004436. eCollection 2022 Aug.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Nerve reconstruction techniques for lumbosacral plexus (LSP) injuries vary. There are no clear treatment guidelines available, and summative evaluations of the literature discussing these surgeries are lacking. For these reasons, this investigation aimed to systematically review and consolidate all available literature discussing surgical interventions for LSP injuries and cohesively present patient-reported and objective postoperative outcomes.

METHODS

The authors conducted a systematic review using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global (via Proquest.com), and ClinicalTrials.gov databases according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. After title and abstract screening, identified articles were read in full and selected for inclusion based on prespecified criteria.

RESULTS

Our literature search identified 8683 potential citations, and after duplicate removal, abstract screening, and full-text review, 62 studies remained meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria. Outcomes were extracted according to the location of injury and type of surgical repair. Injuries were classified into isolated femoral nerve injuries, isolated obturator nerve injuries, isolated sciatic nerve injuries, and multilevel LSP injuries. Surgical treatment was further classified into exploration with neurolysis, direct repair, nerve grafting, and nerve transfer surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Although results vary based on the location of the injury and the surgical technique used, nerve grafts and transfers demonstrated reasonable success in improving functional and pain outcomes. Overall, isolated femoral and obturator nerve injuries had the best outcomes reported with surgical treatment. Furthermore, incomplete sciatic nerve and multilevel LSP injuries had more reported surgical options and better outcomes than complete sciatic nerve injuries.

摘要

背景

腰骶丛(LSP)损伤的神经重建技术各不相同。目前尚无明确的治疗指南,且缺乏对讨论这些手术的文献的总结性评价。基于这些原因,本研究旨在系统回顾并整合所有讨论LSP损伤手术干预的现有文献,并连贯地呈现患者报告的和客观的术后结果。

方法

作者根据系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目指南,使用PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、ProQuest学位论文与全球博硕士论文数据库(通过Proquest.com)以及ClinicalTrials.gov数据库进行了系统评价。在进行标题和摘要筛选后,对筛选出的文章进行全文阅读,并根据预先设定的标准选择纳入研究。

结果

我们的文献检索共识别出8683条潜在引文,在去除重复项、摘要筛选和全文评审后,有62项研究符合纳入和排除标准。根据损伤部位和手术修复类型提取结果。损伤分为孤立性股神经损伤、孤立性闭孔神经损伤、孤立性坐骨神经损伤和多节段腰骶丛损伤。手术治疗进一步分为神经松解探查、直接修复、神经移植和神经转位手术。

结论

尽管结果因损伤部位和所采用的手术技术而异,但神经移植和转位在改善功能和疼痛结果方面显示出合理的成功率。总体而言,孤立性股神经和闭孔神经损伤经手术治疗后的结果最佳。此外,与完全性坐骨神经损伤相比,不完全性坐骨神经损伤和多节段腰骶丛损伤有更多的手术选择且结果更好。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43c1/9400934/29df0c42a3f3/gox-10-e4436-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验