de Roo Saskia F, Teunissen Joris S, Rutten Matthieu J C M, van der Heijden Brigitte E P A
Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022 Aug 25;10(8):e4495. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004495. eCollection 2022 Aug.
Surgeons often prefer to use a tourniquet during minor procedures, such as carpal tunnel release (CTR) or trigger finger release (TFR). Besides the possible discomfort for the patient, the effect of tourniquet use on long-term results and complications is unknown. Our primary aim was to compare the patient-reported outcomes 1 year after CTR or TFR under local anesthesia with or without tourniquet. Secondary outcomes included satisfaction, sonographically estimated scar tissue thickness after CTR' and postoperative complications.
Between May 2019 and May 2020, 163 patients planned for open CTR or TFR under local anesthesia were included. Before surgery, and at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively, Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand and Boston Carpal Tunnel questionnaires were administered, and complications were noted. At 6 months postoperatively, an ultrasound was conducted to determine the thickness of scar tissue in the region of median nerve.
A total of 142 patients (51 men [38%]) were included. The Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire and Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire scores improved significantly in both groups during follow-up, wherein most improvements were seen in the first 3 months. No difference in clinical outcome and scar tissue formation was found between the two groups after 12 months. The complication rate was comparable between both groups. Thirty-two (24%) patients had at least one complication, none needed surgical interventions, and no recurrent symptoms were seen.
Our study shows similar long-term clinical outcomes, formation of scar tissue, and complication rates for patients undergoing CTR or TFR with or without a tourniquet. Tourniquet usage should be based on shared decision-making.
外科医生在进行诸如腕管松解术(CTR)或扳机指松解术(TFR)等小手术时,通常更喜欢使用止血带。除了可能给患者带来不适外,使用止血带对长期效果和并发症的影响尚不清楚。我们的主要目的是比较在局部麻醉下进行CTR或TFR时使用或不使用止血带1年后患者报告的结局。次要结局包括满意度、CTR术后超声估计的瘢痕组织厚度和术后并发症。
纳入2019年5月至2020年5月计划在局部麻醉下进行开放性CTR或TFR的163例患者。在手术前以及术后3、6和12个月,使用上肢、肩部和手部快速残疾问卷以及波士顿腕管问卷,并记录并发症情况。术后6个月,进行超声检查以确定正中神经区域瘢痕组织的厚度。
共纳入142例患者(51例男性[38%])。随访期间,两组的上肢、肩部和手部快速残疾问卷以及波士顿腕管问卷评分均显著改善,其中大部分改善出现在前3个月。12个月后,两组在临床结局和瘢痕组织形成方面无差异。两组的并发症发生率相当。32例(24%)患者至少出现一种并发症,均无需手术干预,且未出现复发症状。
我们的研究表明,进行CTR或TFR的患者使用或不使用止血带的长期临床结局、瘢痕组织形成和并发症发生率相似。止血带的使用应基于共同决策。