Suppr超能文献

网络关注度与肩关节不稳相关出版物的文献计量学影响力之间的正相关关系。

Positive Association Between Online Attention and the Bibliometric Impact of Shoulder Instability Publications.

作者信息

Abdullah Youssef, Mathew Abraham J, Alokozai Aaron, Stamm Michaela A, Mulcahey Mary K

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, U.S.A.

出版信息

Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2022 Jun 11;4(4):e1539-e1544. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2022.04.023. eCollection 2022 Aug.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To obtain a quantifiable measure of the frequency with which a shoulder instability article is discussed online and the association with its corresponding bibliometric impact, based on the Scopus Cite Score (SCS) or Web of Science Impact Factor (WSIF).

METHODS

The top 100 most-mentioned articles on shoulder instability based on Altmetric Attention Score (AAS) were extracted from the Altmetric Database. Mentions within blogs, news articles and outlets, public policy, and social media platforms, such as Twitter and Facebook, were included. Study impact was assessed using SCS or WSIF. The degree of association between AAS and impact was determined using Spearman correlation, logarithmic regression, and multivariate regression.

RESULTS

The most common study designs were "Clinical Trial," with 52 articles (49.5%), "Systematic Review" with 16 articles (15.2%), and "Review" with 10 articles (9.5%). Twitter provided more online mentions than other platforms, with the average article being discussed 27.7 times (range 0-220 times). A significant positive effect (estimate = 2.616,  = .0075) was observed between the AAS and WSIF, based on the logarithmic regression. Multivariate regression revealed that blogs help raise both WSIF and SCS (estimate = 7.272, < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Social media and other online platforms are a strong way to disseminate information to patients. A positive association was observed between overall online attention and the bibliometric impact of an article related to shoulder instability. Clinical trials related to shoulder instability that receive online mentions, especially discussion in blogs, are more likely to be cited in the future than their counterparts.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The results of our study can guide authors as they aim to disseminate their articles. Twitter may be used as a tool to reach patients who may not venture into academic journals with current peer-reviewed articles. Further, blogs may be used to reach academic audiences and raise bibliometric impact broadly.

摘要

目的

基于Scopus引用分数(SCS)或科学网影响因子(WSIF),获得对肩部不稳相关文章在网上被讨论频率及其相应文献计量学影响的量化衡量。

方法

从Altmetric数据库中提取基于Altmetric关注度得分(AAS)排名前100的肩部不稳相关文章。包括博客、新闻文章及媒体、公共政策以及社交媒体平台(如Twitter和Facebook)上的提及。使用SCS或WSIF评估研究影响力。采用Spearman相关性分析、对数回归和多元回归确定AAS与影响力之间的关联程度。

结果

最常见的研究设计为“临床试验”,共52篇文章(49.5%),“系统评价”16篇文章(15.2%),“综述”10篇文章(9.5%)。Twitter上的在线提及比其他平台更多,平均每篇文章被讨论27.7次(范围为0 - 220次)。基于对数回归,AAS与WSIF之间观察到显著的正效应(估计值 = 2.616,P = .0075)。多元回归显示博客有助于提高WSIF和SCS(估计值 = 7.272,P < .05)。

结论

社交媒体和其他在线平台是向患者传播信息的有力途径。观察到肩部不稳相关文章的整体在线关注度与文献计量学影响之间存在正相关。在网上被提及,尤其是在博客中被讨论的肩部不稳相关临床试验,未来比其他同类试验更有可能被引用。

临床意义

我们的研究结果可为作者传播文章提供指导。Twitter可作为一种工具,接触那些可能不会阅读当前同行评审学术期刊文章的患者。此外,博客可用于接触学术受众并广泛提高文献计量学影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82a5/9402471/451e81913440/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验