O'Dwyer Liam, Ledingham Conor, Davey Martin S, Kerin Austin, Huszar Azim, Cassidy J Tristan
Graduate Entry Medical School, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Department of Trauma & Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2024 Jul 14;6(5):100974. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2024.100974. eCollection 2024 Oct.
PURPOSE: To compare the characteristics of the top-20 studies about anterior shoulder instability according to the Altmetric Attention Score (AAS) with total citation counts. METHODS: Two separate searches were performed for articles related to anterior shoulder instability. The Altmetric search identified the top-20 articles according to AAS. A bibliometric search using Web of Science identified the top-20 most-cited articles. Altmetric criteria were applied to the bibliometric list and vice versa. RESULTS: The AAS from the Altmetric list ranged from 44 to 432. The highest AAS from the bibliometric search was 70. One study appeared in both lists. Most online mentions were from X (formerly Twitter). The geographical breakdown of X mentions saw 71 countries appearing in the Altmetric search versus 21 in the bibliometric search. The total citations in the bibliometric list ranged from 91 to 358 versus 0 to 121 for the Altmetric list. The Altmetric top-20 list contained 8 studies that were Level II or higher versus 3 in the bibliometric list. CONCLUSIONS: The top-20 studies according to AAS or citation count are not the same. The top-20 studies by AAS are composed of studies at higher levels of evidence versus the top-20 studies when listed by citation count. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Electronic searches are an important way to access information in the modern world. Different search options generate results according to different parameters and may generate different results for the same query. It is important to understand these differences so that users have a better understanding of where the most clinically useful information can be found, especially regarding medical conditions.
目的:根据Altmetric关注度评分(AAS)比较关于前肩不稳的前20项研究的特征与总被引次数。 方法:针对与前肩不稳相关的文章进行了两项独立检索。Altmetric检索根据AAS确定了前20篇文章。使用科学网进行的文献计量检索确定了被引次数最多的前20篇文章。将Altmetric标准应用于文献计量列表,反之亦然。 结果:Altmetric列表中的AAS范围为44至432。文献计量检索中最高的AAS为70。有一项研究出现在两个列表中。大多数在线提及来自X(前身为推特)。X提及的地理分布显示,Altmetric检索中有71个国家出现,而文献计量检索中有21个国家出现。文献计量列表中的总被引次数范围为91至358,而Altmetric列表为0至121。Altmetric排名前20的列表中有8项研究为II级或更高级别,而文献计量列表中有3项。 结论:根据AAS或被引次数排名的前20项研究并不相同。按AAS排名的前20项研究由证据水平较高的研究组成,而按被引次数列出的前20项研究则不然。 临床相关性:电子检索是现代获取信息的重要方式。不同的检索选项根据不同参数生成结果,对于相同查询可能产生不同结果。了解这些差异很重要,以便用户更好地理解在哪里可以找到最具临床实用性的信息,尤其是关于医疗状况的信息。
Arch Osteoporos. 2021-8-19
Bratisl Lek Listy. 2022
Clin Orthop Surg. 2024-6
Int Ophthalmol. 2021-6
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2022-6-11
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022-7-28
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022-1-15
Orthop J Sports Med. 2021-3-26