• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

稳态视觉诱发电位(SSVEP)追踪“固执”思维,但不追踪更普遍的走神。

The steady state visual evoked potential (SSVEP) tracks "sticky" thinking, but not more general mind-wandering.

作者信息

Yang Hang, Paller Ken A, van Vugt Marieke

机构信息

Bernoulli Institute for Mathematics, Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.

Department of Psychology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, United States.

出版信息

Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Aug 11;16:892863. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.892863. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2022.892863
PMID:36034124
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9402933/
Abstract

For a large proportion of our daily lives, spontaneously occurring thoughts tend to disengage our minds from goal-directed thinking. Previous studies showed that EEG features such as the P3 and alpha oscillations can predict mind-wandering to some extent, but only with accuracies of around 60%. A potential candidate for improving prediction accuracy is the Steady-State Visual Evoked Potential (SSVEP), which is used frequently in single-trial contexts such as brain-computer interfaces as a marker of the direction of attention. In this study, we modified the sustained attention to response task (SART) that is usually employed to measure spontaneous thought to incorporate the SSVEP elicited by a 12.5-Hz flicker. We then examined whether the SSVEP could track and allow for the prediction of the stickiness and task-relatedness dimensions of spontaneous thought. Our results show that the SSVEP evoked by flickering words was able to distinguish between more and less sticky thinking but not between whether a participant was on- or off-task. This suggests that the SSVEP is able to track spontaneous thinking when it is strongly disengaged from the task (as in the sticky form of off-task thinking) but not off-task thought in general. Future research should determine the exact dimensions of spontaneous thought to which the SSVEP is most sensitive.

摘要

在我们日常生活的很大一部分时间里,自发产生的想法往往会使我们的思维从目标导向的思考中脱离出来。先前的研究表明,诸如P3和阿尔法振荡等脑电图特征在一定程度上可以预测走神,但准确率仅约为60%。提高预测准确率的一个潜在候选因素是稳态视觉诱发电位(SSVEP),它在诸如脑机接口等单次试验情境中经常被用作注意力方向的标记。在本研究中,我们修改了通常用于测量自发思维的持续注意力对反应任务(SART),以纳入由12.5赫兹闪烁诱发的SSVEP。然后,我们研究了SSVEP是否能够追踪并预测自发思维的粘性和与任务相关性维度。我们的结果表明,由闪烁文字诱发的SSVEP能够区分粘性较强和较弱的思维,但无法区分参与者是否在执行任务。这表明,当自发思维与任务强烈脱离时(如在非任务思维的粘性形式中),SSVEP能够追踪自发思维,但一般无法追踪非任务思维。未来的研究应该确定SSVEP最敏感的自发思维的确切维度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fda5/9402933/f5ebbb7b3a97/fnhum-16-892863-g0010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fda5/9402933/2fe0460d1817/fnhum-16-892863-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fda5/9402933/2ae2feee85fe/fnhum-16-892863-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fda5/9402933/34b07d1276f0/fnhum-16-892863-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fda5/9402933/07471cc6b043/fnhum-16-892863-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fda5/9402933/f1cb3e2aea2e/fnhum-16-892863-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fda5/9402933/e513a69a5117/fnhum-16-892863-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fda5/9402933/27958cac1cac/fnhum-16-892863-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fda5/9402933/abe1ccca9656/fnhum-16-892863-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fda5/9402933/609e2ce2388b/fnhum-16-892863-g0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fda5/9402933/f5ebbb7b3a97/fnhum-16-892863-g0010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fda5/9402933/2fe0460d1817/fnhum-16-892863-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fda5/9402933/2ae2feee85fe/fnhum-16-892863-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fda5/9402933/34b07d1276f0/fnhum-16-892863-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fda5/9402933/07471cc6b043/fnhum-16-892863-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fda5/9402933/f1cb3e2aea2e/fnhum-16-892863-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fda5/9402933/e513a69a5117/fnhum-16-892863-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fda5/9402933/27958cac1cac/fnhum-16-892863-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fda5/9402933/abe1ccca9656/fnhum-16-892863-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fda5/9402933/609e2ce2388b/fnhum-16-892863-g0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fda5/9402933/f5ebbb7b3a97/fnhum-16-892863-g0010.jpg

相似文献

1
The steady state visual evoked potential (SSVEP) tracks "sticky" thinking, but not more general mind-wandering.稳态视觉诱发电位(SSVEP)追踪“固执”思维,但不追踪更普遍的走神。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Aug 11;16:892863. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.892863. eCollection 2022.
2
Predicting task-general mind-wandering with EEG.利用脑电图预测一般任务中的走神。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2019 Aug;19(4):1059-1073. doi: 10.3758/s13415-019-00707-1.
3
Self-Reported Stickiness of Mind-Wandering Affects Task Performance.自我报告的走神粘性会影响任务表现。
Front Psychol. 2016 May 18;7:732. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00732. eCollection 2016.
4
Captivated by thought: "Sticky" thinking leaves traces of perceptual decoupling in task-evoked pupil size.被思维吸引:“黏着”思维在任务诱发的瞳孔大小中留下知觉解耦的痕迹。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 9;15(12):e0243532. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243532. eCollection 2020.
5
Decoding emotion from high-frequency steady state visual evoked potential (SSVEP).从高频稳态视觉诱发电位(SSVEP)中解码情绪。
J Neurosci Methods. 2023 Jul 15;395:109919. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2023.109919. Epub 2023 Jul 7.
6
Evaluating the feasibility of the steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP) to study temporal attention.评估稳态视觉诱发电位(SSVEP)研究时间注意的可行性。
Psychophysiology. 2018 May;55(5):e13029. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13029. Epub 2017 Nov 9.
7
Exploration of User's Mental State Changes during Performing Brain-Computer Interface.探索用户在执行脑机接口时的心理状态变化。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Jun 3;20(11):3169. doi: 10.3390/s20113169.
8
Steady-state visual evoked potentials differentiate between internally and externally directed attention.稳态视觉诱发电位可区分内源性和外源性注意。
Neuroimage. 2022 Jul 1;254:119133. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119133. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
9
Mind wandering and motor control: off-task thinking disrupts the online adjustment of behavior.思维漫游与运动控制:心不在焉的思维会干扰行为的在线调整。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Dec 14;6:329. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00329. eCollection 2012.
10
Dissociating the freely-moving thought dimension of mind-wandering from the intentionality and task-unrelated thought dimensions.将游离思维的自由移动维度与意向性和任务无关的思维维度区分开来。
Psychol Res. 2021 Oct;85(7):2599-2609. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01419-9. Epub 2020 Sep 15.

引用本文的文献

1
The Relative Accuracy of Different Methods for Measuring Mind Wandering Subtypes: A Systematic Review.测量思维游荡亚型的不同方法的相对准确性:一项系统综述。
Brain Behav. 2025 Aug;15(8):e70764. doi: 10.1002/brb3.70764.
2
Further unpacking individual differences in mind wandering: The role of emotional valence and awareness.进一步剖析思维漫游中的个体差异:情绪效价和意识的作用。
Conscious Cogn. 2024 Jul;122:103697. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2024.103697. Epub 2024 May 31.
3
Understanding mechanisms of depression prevention: study protocol of a randomized cross-over trial to investigate mechanisms of mindfulness and positive fantasizing as intervention techniques for reducing perseverative cognition in remitted depressed individuals.

本文引用的文献

1
A complete, unabridged, "pre-registered" descriptive experience sampling investigation: The case of Lena.一项完整、未删节的“预注册”描述性经验抽样调查:莉娜的案例。
Phenomenol Cogn Sci. 2023;22(1):267-287. doi: 10.1007/s11097-021-09763-w. Epub 2021 Aug 18.
2
Captivated by thought: "Sticky" thinking leaves traces of perceptual decoupling in task-evoked pupil size.被思维吸引:“黏着”思维在任务诱发的瞳孔大小中留下知觉解耦的痕迹。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 9;15(12):e0243532. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243532. eCollection 2020.
3
Probing the neural signature of mind wandering with simultaneous fMRI-EEG and pupillometry.
了解抑郁症预防机制:一项随机交叉试验的研究方案,旨在探究正念和积极幻想作为干预技术减少缓解期抑郁症患者持续性认知的机制。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Feb 19;24(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05592-8.
4
A High-Resolution LED Stimulator for Steady-State Visual Stimulation: Customizable, Affordable, and Open Source.一种用于稳态视觉刺激的高分辨率LED刺激器:可定制、价格实惠且开源。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Jan 21;24(2):678. doi: 10.3390/s24020678.
5
Comparing resting state and task-based EEG using machine learning to predict vulnerability to depression in a non-clinical population.使用机器学习比较静息态和任务态 EEG 以预测非临床人群对抑郁症的易感性。
Sci Rep. 2023 May 8;13(1):7467. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-34298-2.
运用 fMRI-EEG 和瞳孔测量技术探究思维漫游的神经特征。
Neuroimage. 2021 Jan 1;224:117412. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117412. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
4
Differential effects of mind-wandering and visual distraction on age-related changes in neuro-electric brain activity and variability.心流和视觉分心对神经电脑活动和可变性与年龄相关变化的影响差异。
Neuropsychologia. 2020 Sep;146:107565. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107565. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
5
Distinguishing vigilance decrement and low task demands from mind-wandering: A machine learning analysis of EEG.从走神中区分警觉性下降和低任务需求:基于脑电图的机器学习分析
Eur J Neurosci. 2020 Nov;52(9):4147-4164. doi: 10.1111/ejn.14863. Epub 2020 Jun 28.
6
Quantifying streams of thought during cognitive task performance using sequence analysis.使用序列分析量化认知任务执行过程中的思维流。
Behav Res Methods. 2020 Dec;52(6):2417-2437. doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01416-1.
7
Inter-trial alpha power indicates mind wandering.试验间 alpha 功率表明思维漫游。
Psychophysiology. 2020 Jun;57(6):e13581. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13581. Epub 2020 Apr 11.
8
Attention differentially modulates the amplitude of resonance frequencies in the visual cortex.注意会有差异地调节视觉皮层中共振频率的幅度。
Neuroimage. 2019 Dec;203:116146. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116146. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
9
Normative event-related potentials from sensory and cognitive tasks reveal occipital and frontal activities prior and following visual events.正常情况下,与感觉和认知任务相关的事件相关电位会在视觉事件发生之前和之后揭示枕叶和额叶的活动。
Neuroimage. 2019 Aug 1;196:173-187. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.04.033. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
10
Predicting task-general mind-wandering with EEG.利用脑电图预测一般任务中的走神。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2019 Aug;19(4):1059-1073. doi: 10.3758/s13415-019-00707-1.