Suppr超能文献

人们对认知增强有何期望?

What Do People Expect of Cognitive Enhancement?

作者信息

Rabipour Sheida, Andringa Ronald, Boot Walter R, Davidson Patrick S R

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Department of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, USA.

出版信息

J Cogn Enhanc. 2018 Mar;2(1):70-77. doi: 10.1007/s41465-017-0050-3. Epub 2017 Oct 27.

Abstract

Enhancing cognitive function through mentally challenging exercises ("brain training") or non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) is an enticing yet controversial prospect. Although use of these methods is increasing rapidly, their effectiveness remains questionable. Notably, cognitive enhancement studies have typically failed to consider participants' expectations. However, high expectations could easily make brain-training approaches appear more effective than they actually are. We addressed this major gap in the literature by assessing the perceived effectiveness of brain training and NIBS in a series of surveys. Our results suggest that people are optimistic about the possibilities of cognitive enhancement, particularly through brain training. Moreover, reading a brief message implying high or low effectiveness of such methods can raise or lower expectations, respectively, suggesting that perceptions of brain training are malleable - at least in the short term. Measuring expectations in brain training and NIBS is important to determining whether these cognitive enhancement methods truly are effective.

摘要

通过具有心理挑战性的练习(“大脑训练”)或非侵入性脑刺激(NIBS)来增强认知功能是一个诱人但存在争议的前景。尽管这些方法的使用正在迅速增加,但其有效性仍然存疑。值得注意的是,认知增强研究通常没有考虑参与者的期望。然而,高期望很容易使大脑训练方法看起来比实际更有效。我们通过在一系列调查中评估大脑训练和NIBS的感知有效性,解决了文献中的这一主要空白。我们的结果表明,人们对认知增强的可能性持乐观态度,尤其是通过大脑训练。此外,阅读一条暗示此类方法有效性高或低的简短信息,可分别提高或降低期望,这表明对大脑训练的认知是可塑的——至少在短期内是这样。在大脑训练和NIBS中测量期望对于确定这些认知增强方法是否真的有效很重要。

相似文献

1
What Do People Expect of Cognitive Enhancement?人们对认知增强有何期望?
J Cogn Enhanc. 2018 Mar;2(1):70-77. doi: 10.1007/s41465-017-0050-3. Epub 2017 Oct 27.
3
Expectations may influence the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation.期望可能会影响经颅直流电刺激的效果。
Neuropsychologia. 2018 Oct;119:524-534. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.09.005. Epub 2018 Sep 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Evidence for Narrow Transfer after Short-Term Cognitive Training in Older Adults.老年人短期认知训练后窄迁移的证据。
Front Aging Neurosci. 2017 Feb 28;9:41. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2017.00041. eCollection 2017.
2
Putting placebos to the test.对安慰剂进行检验。
PLoS Biol. 2017 Feb 21;15(2):e2001998. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2001998. eCollection 2017 Feb.
4
Do "Brain-Training" Programs Work?“大脑训练”计划是否有效?
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2016 Oct;17(3):103-186. doi: 10.1177/1529100616661983.
5
Placebo effects in cognitive training.认知训练中的安慰剂效应。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Jul 5;113(27):7470-4. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1601243113. Epub 2016 Jun 20.
6
Medical risks: Regulate devices for brain stimulation.
Nature. 2016 May 12;533(7602):179. doi: 10.1038/533179d.
8
Seven Pervasive Statistical Flaws in Cognitive Training Interventions.认知训练干预中的七个普遍存在的统计缺陷。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Apr 14;10:153. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00153. eCollection 2016.
10
NEUROSCIENCE. The unknowns of cognitive enhancement.神经科学。认知增强的未知因素。
Science. 2015 Oct 23;350(6259):379-80. doi: 10.1126/science.aad5893.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验