Pan Dong, Rong Xiaoming, Chen Dongping, Jiang Jingru, Ng Wai Tong, Mai Haiqiang, Li Yi, Li Honghong, Cai Jinhua, Cheng Jinping, Xu Yongteng, Chua Melvin Lee Kiang, Simone Charles B, Lattanzi Simona, Tang Yamei
Department of Neurology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
The 5th Ward of Radiotherapy Department, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
EClinicalMedicine. 2022 Aug 12;52:101618. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101618. eCollection 2022 Oct.
The evidence of early treatment for radiation-induced brain necrosis (RN) in head and neck cancer survivors remains insufficient. This study aimed to determine whether early anti-RN treatment was associated with lower mortality.
In this cohort study, we utilized data from the Study in Radiotherapy-related Nervous System Complications (NCT03908502) and Hong Kong Cancer Registry. We included consecutive patients who had received radiotherapy (RT) for head and neck cancers and had subsequently developed RN between Jan 8, 2005 and Jan 19, 2020. Patients who had tumor progression before the diagnosis of RN, underwent surgical brain necrosis lesions resection before corticosteroids and/or bevacizumab treatment, had intracranial metastases before the diagnosis of RN, lacked follow-up data, or had a follow-up period of less than three months were excluded. Individual-level data were extracted from electronic medical records of the above-mentioned registries. The primary outcome was all-cause death. The vital status of each patient was confirmed through a standardized telephone interview. We compared patients who received early treatment (initiating bevacizumab or corticosteroids treatment within three months after RN diagnosis) with patients who did not (following a "watch-and-wait" policy).
Of 641 eligible patients, 451 patients (70·4%) received early treatment after RN diagnosis and 190 patients (29·6%) did not. Overall, 112 patients (17·5%) died, of whom 73 (16·2%) in the early treatment group and 39 (20·5%) in the watch-and-wait group, during a median follow-up of 3·87 years. The early treatment group showed a lower risk of all-cause death compared with the watch-and-wait group after adjusting for age, sex, absence or presence of neurological symptoms at baseline, RN lesion features on brain magnetic resonance imaging, history of stroke, prior tumor-related characteristics (TNM stage, RT dose and techniques, and chemotherapy), and the time interval from RT to RN (HR 0·48, 95%CI 0·30 to 0·77; = 0·0027), and extensive sensitivity analyses yielded similar results. There was no significant difference in the effect of early treatment on post-RN survival among subgroups stratified by presence or absence of neurological symptoms at diagnosis (p for interaction=0·41).
Among head and neck cancer survivors with RN, initiating treatment early after RN diagnosis is associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality as compared with following the watch-and-wait policy, irrespective of whether patients exhibit symptoms or not. Further prospective randomised studies would be needed to validate our findings since the observational study design might lead to some potential confounding. In the absence of data from randomised trials, our study will have an important implication for clinicians regarding the optimal timing of treatment for RN, and provides the foundation and supporting data for future trials on this topic.
National Natural Science Foundation of China (81925031, 81820108026, 81872549, 81801229, 82003389), the Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou (202007030001), Young Teacher Training Program of Sun Yat-sen University (20ykpy106), Key-Area Research and Development Program of Guangdong Province (2018B030340001), the National Medical Research Council Singapore Clinician Scientist Award (NMRC/CSA-INV/0027/2018, CSAINV20nov-0021), the Duke-NUS Oncology Academic Program Goh Foundation Proton Research Programme, NCCS Cancer Fund, the Kua Hong Pak Head and Neck Cancer Research Programme, and the National Research Foundation Clinical Research Programme Grant (NRF-CRP17-2017-05).
头颈部癌幸存者放射性脑坏死(RN)早期治疗的证据仍然不足。本研究旨在确定早期抗RN治疗是否与较低的死亡率相关。
在这项队列研究中,我们利用了放射治疗相关神经系统并发症研究(NCT03908502)和香港癌症登记处的数据。我们纳入了2005年1月8日至2020年1月19日期间接受过头颈部癌放疗且随后发生RN的连续患者。排除在RN诊断前有肿瘤进展、在使用皮质类固醇和/或贝伐单抗治疗前行手术切除脑坏死病灶、在RN诊断前有颅内转移、缺乏随访数据或随访期少于三个月的患者。从上述登记处的电子病历中提取个体水平的数据。主要结局是全因死亡。通过标准化电话访谈确认每位患者的生命状态。我们将接受早期治疗(在RN诊断后三个月内开始使用贝伐单抗或皮质类固醇治疗)的患者与未接受早期治疗(遵循“观察等待”策略)的患者进行了比较。
在641例符合条件的患者中,451例(70.4%)在RN诊断后接受了早期治疗,190例(29.6%)未接受早期治疗。总体而言,在中位随访3.87年期间,112例患者(17.5%)死亡,其中早期治疗组73例(16.2%),观察等待组39例(20.5%)。在调整年龄、性别、基线时有无神经症状、脑磁共振成像上的RN病变特征、中风病史、既往肿瘤相关特征(TNM分期、放疗剂量和技术以及化疗)以及从放疗到RN的时间间隔后,早期治疗组与观察等待组相比全因死亡风险较低(HR 0.48,95%CI 0.30至0.77;P = 0.0027),广泛的敏感性分析得出了类似结果。在按诊断时有无神经症状分层的亚组中,早期治疗对RN后生存的影响没有显著差异(交互作用P = 0.41)。
在患有RN的头颈部癌幸存者中,与观察等待策略相比,RN诊断后尽早开始治疗与全因死亡率较低相关,无论患者是否出现症状。由于观察性研究设计可能导致一些潜在的混杂因素,因此需要进一步的前瞻性随机研究来验证我们的发现。在缺乏随机试验数据的情况下,我们的研究将对临床医生关于RN治疗的最佳时机具有重要意义,并为该主题的未来试验提供基础和支持数据。
中国国家自然科学基金(81925031、81820108026、81872549、81801229、82003389)、广州市科技计划(202007030001)、中山大学青年教师培训计划(20ykpy106)、广东省重点领域研发计划(2018B030340001)、新加坡国家医学研究理事会临床科学家奖(NMRC/CSA-INV/0027/2018,CSAINV20nov-0021)、杜克-国大肿瘤学学术项目吴基金会质子研究计划、新加坡国立癌症中心癌症基金、郭宏柏头颈癌研究计划以及国家研究基金会临床研究计划资助(NRF-CRP17-2017-05)