Gao Ruo-Lin, Song Jun, Sun Li, Wu Zhi-Xuan, Yi Xiao-Fang, Zhang Shu-Ling, Huang Le-Tian, Ma Jie-Tao, Han Cheng-Bo
Department of Oncology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Aug 10;13:920165. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.920165. eCollection 2022.
Immune checkpoint and antiangiogenic inhibitors have a potentially synergistic antitumor effect. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of immunotherapy in combination with antiangiogenesis therapy with or without chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane library, Google Scholar, Ovid, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for eligible trials. ClinicalTrials.gov and meeting abstracts were also searched for qualified clinical studies. The inclusion criteria were as follows: prospective studies (including single-arm studies) that evaluated efficacy and/or toxicity of immunotherapy combined with antiangiogenic agents (A + I) with or without chemotherapy (A + I + chemo) in patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC; and primary outcome of each study reported at least one of these endpoints: progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), or adverse events (AEs). Twenty three prospective studies comprising 1,856 patients with advanced NSCLC were included. The pooled ORR, median PFS and estimated overall survival were 39%, 6.8 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 5.53-8.13], and 18.6 months in the overall group. Similar ORR and median PFS with A + I + chemo versus A + I were observed in patients treated in first-line setting [59% and 9.47 months (95% CI, 6.45-12.49) versus 52% and 10.9 months (95% CI, 1.81-19.98), respectively]. We also observed improved ORR and mPFS with A + I + chemo versus A + I in subsequent-line setting [56% and 8.1 months (95% CI, 5.00-11.26) versus 22% and 5.1 months (95% CI, 4.01-6.15), respectively]. Efficacy of A + I + chemo therapy was evident across different PD-L1 subgroups, especially in patients with EGFR mutations [ORR: 59%; mPFS: 8.13 months (95% CI: 5.00-11.26)] or baseline liver metastases. The incidence of AEs with a major grade of ≥3 in the overall, A + I, and A + I + chemo groups were 4.1% vs. 5.5% vs. 3.4% for proteinuria, 13.7% vs. 16.2% vs. 9.7% for hypertension, and 1.9% vs. 1.2% vs. 2.8% for rash, respectively. No new safety signals were identified in this pooled analysis. Immunotherapy combined with antiangiogenic agents with or without chemotherapy showed encouraging antitumor activity and an acceptable toxicity profile in treatment-naïve or pretreated patients with advanced NSCLC. Doublet treatment with immunotherapy and antiangiogenic agents might be a new option for patients with advanced NSCLC, especially those who are treatment-naive or cannot tolerate chemotherapy.
免疫检查点抑制剂和抗血管生成抑制剂具有潜在的协同抗肿瘤作用。我们旨在评估免疫治疗联合抗血管生成治疗(联合或不联合化疗)在晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者中的疗效和安全性。检索了PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆、谷歌学术、Ovid、Scopus和Web of Science以查找符合条件的试验。还检索了ClinicalTrials.gov和会议摘要以查找合格的临床研究。纳入标准如下:前瞻性研究(包括单臂研究),评估免疫治疗联合抗血管生成药物(A+I)联合或不联合化疗(A+I+化疗)在晚期或转移性NSCLC患者中的疗效和/或毒性;每项研究的主要结局报告了以下至少一个终点:无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期、客观缓解率(ORR)、疾病控制率(DCR)或不良事件(AE)。纳入了23项前瞻性研究,共1856例晚期NSCLC患者。总体组的汇总ORR、中位PFS和估计总生存期分别为39%、6.8个月[95%置信区间(CI),5.53 - 8.13]和18.6个月。在一线治疗的患者中,观察到A+I+化疗组与A+I组的ORR和中位PFS相似[分别为59%和9.47个月(95%CI,6.45 - 12.49)与52%和10.9个月(95%CI,1.81 - 19.98)]。在后续治疗线中,我们也观察到A+I+化疗组与A+I组相比ORR和mPFS有所改善[分别为56%和8.1个月(95%CI,5.00 - 11.26)与22%和5.1个月(95%CI,4.01 - 6.15)]。A+I+化疗治疗在不同的PD-L1亚组中疗效明显,尤其是在EGFR突变患者[ORR:59%;mPFS:8.13个月(95%CI:5.00 - 11.26)]或基线有肝转移的患者中。总体组、A+I组和A+I+化疗组中≥3级主要AE的发生率分别为:蛋白尿4.1%对5.5%对3.4%,高血压13.7%对16.2%对9.7%,皮疹1.9%对1.2%对2.8%。在这项汇总分析中未发现新的安全信号。免疫治疗联合抗血管生成药物联合或不联合化疗在初治或经治的晚期NSCLC患者中显示出令人鼓舞的抗肿瘤活性和可接受的毒性特征。免疫治疗和抗血管生成药物的双联治疗可能是晚期NSCLC患者的一种新选择,尤其是那些初治或不能耐受化疗的患者。