Suppr超能文献

帕博利珠单抗联合或不联合仑伐替尼用于程序性死亡配体 1 肿瘤比例评分至少为 1%的一线转移性非小细胞肺癌(LEAP-007):一项随机、双盲、III 期试验。

Pembrolizumab With or Without Lenvatinib for First-Line Metastatic NSCLC With Programmed Cell Death-Ligand 1 Tumor Proportion Score of at least 1% (LEAP-007): A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 3 Trial.

机构信息

Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.

Department of Pulmonary, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

J Thorac Oncol. 2024 Jun;19(6):941-953. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2023.12.023. Epub 2023 Dec 29.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab was found to have antitumor activity and acceptable safety in previously treated metastatic NSCLC. We evaluated first-line lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus placebo plus pembrolizumab in metastatic NSCLC in the LEAP-007 study (NCT03829332/NCT04676412).

METHODS

Patients with previously untreated stage IV NSCLC with programmed cell death-ligand 1 tumor proportion score of at least 1% without targetable EGFR/ROS1/ALK aberrations were randomized 1:1 to lenvatinib 20 mg or placebo once daily; all patients received pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks for up to 35 cycles. Primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 and overall survival (OS). We report results from a prespecified nonbinding futility analysis of OS performed at the fourth independent data and safety monitoring committee review (futility bound: one-sided p < 0.4960).

RESULTS

A total of 623 patients were randomized. At median follow-up of 15.9 months, median (95% confidence interval [CI]) OS was 14.1 (11.4‒19.0) months in the lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab group versus 16.4 (12.6‒20.6) months in the placebo plus pembrolizumab group (hazard ratio = 1.10 [95% CI: 0.87‒1.39], p = 0.79744 [futility criterion met]). Median (95% CI) PFS was 6.6 (6.1‒8.2) months versus 4.2 (4.1‒6.2) months, respectively (hazard ratio = 0.78 [95% CI: 0.64‒0.95]). Grade 3 to 5 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 57.9% of patients (179 of 309) versus 24.4% (76 of 312). Per data and safety monitoring committee recommendation, the study was unblinded and lenvatinib and placebo were discontinued.

CONCLUSIONS

Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab did not have a favorable benefit‒risk profile versus placebo plus pembrolizumab. Pembrolizumab monotherapy remains an approved treatment option in many regions for first-line metastatic NSCLC with programmed cell death-ligand 1 tumor proportion score of at least 1% without EGFR/ALK alterations.

摘要

简介

仑伐替尼联合帕博利珠单抗在先前治疗的转移性 NSCLC 中显示出抗肿瘤活性和可接受的安全性。我们在 LEAP-007 研究(NCT03829332/NCT04676412)中评估了转移性 NSCLC 患者的一线仑伐替尼联合帕博利珠单抗与安慰剂联合帕博利珠单抗的疗效。

方法

患有未经治疗的 IV 期 NSCLC 的患者,其程序性死亡配体 1 肿瘤比例评分至少为 1%,且无靶向 EGFR/ROS1/ALK 异常,按 1:1 随机分配至仑伐替尼 20 mg 或安慰剂每日一次;所有患者每 3 周接受帕博利珠单抗 200 mg 治疗,最多 35 个周期。主要终点为根据实体瘤反应评价标准 1.1 版评估的无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。我们报告了在第四次独立数据和安全监测委员会审查时进行的预先指定的非绑定无效性分析的结果(无效边界:单侧 p<0.4960)。

结果

共纳入 623 例患者。在中位随访 15.9 个月时,仑伐替尼联合帕博利珠单抗组的中位(95%置信区间[CI])OS 为 14.1(11.4-19.0)个月,安慰剂联合帕博利珠单抗组为 16.4(12.6-20.6)个月(风险比=1.10[95%CI:0.87-1.39],p=0.79744[无效标准符合])。中位(95%CI)PFS 分别为 6.6(6.1-8.2)个月和 4.2(4.1-6.2)个月(风险比=0.78[95%CI:0.64-0.95])。3 至 5 级治疗相关不良事件分别发生在 57.9%(179/309)和 24.4%(76/312)的患者中。根据数据和安全监测委员会的建议,该研究已揭盲,仑伐替尼和安慰剂已停用。

结论

仑伐替尼联合帕博利珠单抗与安慰剂联合帕博利珠单抗相比,没有更好的获益-风险比。在许多地区,对于 PD-L1 肿瘤比例评分至少为 1%且无 EGFR/ALK 改变的转移性 NSCLC 患者,帕博利珠单抗单药治疗仍然是一种获批的治疗选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验