Hou Danlin, Wang Liangzhu Leon, Katal Ali, Yan Shujie, Zhou Liang Grace, Wang Vicky, Vuotari Mark, Li Ethan, Xie Zihan
Centre for Zero Energy Building Studies, Department of Building, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Concordia University, 1455 de Maisonneuve Blvd. West, Montreal, Quebec H3G 1M8 Canada.
Construction Research Centre, Engineering Division, National Research Council of Canada, M-24, 1200 Montreal Road, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0R6 Canada.
Build Simul. 2023;16(1):133-149. doi: 10.1007/s12273-022-0926-8. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
Outdoor fresh air ventilation plays a significant role in reducing airborne transmission of diseases in indoor spaces. School classrooms are considerably challenged during the COVID-19 pandemic because of the increasing need for in-person education, untimely and incompleted vaccinations, high occupancy density, and uncertain ventilation conditions. Many schools started to use CO meters to indicate air quality, but how to interpret the data remains unclear. Many uncertainties are also involved, including manual readings, student numbers and schedules, uncertain CO generation rates, and variable indoor and ambient conditions. This study proposed a Bayesian inference approach with sensitivity analysis to understand CO readings in four primary schools by identifying uncertainties and calibrating key parameters. The outdoor ventilation rate, CO generation rate, and occupancy level were identified as the top sensitive parameters for indoor CO levels. The occupancy schedule becomes critical when the CO data are limited, whereas a 15-min measurement interval could capture dynamic CO profiles well even without the occupancy information. Hourly CO recording should be avoided because it failed to capture peak values and overestimated the ventilation rates. For the four primary school rooms, the calibrated ventilation rate with a 95% confidence level for fall condition is 1.96±0.31 ACH for Room #1 (165 m and 20 occupancies) with mechanical ventilation, and for the rest of the naturally ventilated rooms, it is 0.40±0.08 ACH for Room #2 (236 m and 21 occupancies), 0.30±0.04 or 0.79±0.06 ACH depending on occupancy schedules for Room #3 (236 m and 19 occupancies), 0.40±0.32,0.48±0.37,0.72±0.39 ACH for Room #4 (231 m and 8-9 occupancies) for three consecutive days.
室外新鲜空气通风在减少室内空间疾病的空气传播方面起着重要作用。在新冠疫情期间,学校教室面临着巨大挑战,这是因为面对面教育的需求增加、疫苗接种不及时和不完整、高占用密度以及不确定的通风条件。许多学校开始使用一氧化碳(CO)仪表来指示空气质量,但如何解读这些数据仍不明确。其中还涉及许多不确定性,包括人工读数、学生人数和课程安排、不确定的CO产生率以及变化的室内和环境条件。本研究提出了一种带有敏感性分析的贝叶斯推理方法,通过识别不确定性和校准关键参数来理解四所小学的CO读数。室外通风率、CO产生率和占用水平被确定为室内CO水平的最敏感参数。当CO数据有限时,占用时间表变得至关重要,而即使没有占用信息,15分钟的测量间隔也能很好地捕捉动态CO曲线。应避免每小时记录CO,因为它无法捕捉峰值并高估了通风率。对于这四间小学教室,秋季条件下,1号房间(165平方米,20个座位)采用机械通风,校准后的通风率在95%置信水平下为1.96±0.31次换气次数(ACH);对于其余自然通风的房间,2号房间(236平方米,21个座位)为0.40±0.08 ACH,3号房间(236平方米,19个座位)根据占用时间表为0.30±0.04或0.79±0.06 ACH,4号房间(231平方米,8 - 9个座位)连续三天的通风率分别为0.40±0.32、0.48±0.37、0.72±0.39 ACH。