Lin Yangyi, Pang Lingpin, Huang Shian, Shen Jieyan, Wu Weifeng, Tang Fangming, Su Weiqing, Zhu Xiulong, Sun Jingzhi, Quan Ruilin, Yang Tao, Han Huijun, He Jianguo
Department of Pulmonary Vascular Disease, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Cardiovascular Medicine Center, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, China.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Aug 12;9:983803. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.983803. eCollection 2022.
Patients with left heart failure (LHF) are often associated with the development of pulmonary hypertension (PH) which leads to an increased risk of death. Recently, the diagnostic standard for PH has changed from mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) ≥25 mmHg to >20 mmHg. Nonetheless, the effect of borderline PH (mPAP: 21-24 mmHg) on the prognosis of LHF patients is unclear. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between borderline PH and 3-year clinical outcomes in LHF patients.
A retrospective analysis of a prospective cohort study was done for LHF patients who underwent right heart catheterization (RHC) between January 2013 and November 2016. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality; the secondary outcome was rehospitalization.
Among 344 patients, 62.5% were identified with a proportion of PH (mPAP ≥ 25), 10.8% with borderline PH (21-24), and 26.7% with non-PH (≤20), respectively. Multivariable Cox analysis revealed that borderline PH patients had a higher adjusted mortality risk (HR = 3.822; 95% CI: 1.043-13.999; = 0.043) than non-PH patients. When mPAP was treated as a continuous variable, the hazard ratio for death increased progressively with increasing mPAP starting at 20 mmHg (HR = 1.006; 95% CI: 1.001-1.012). There was no statistically significant difference in adjusted rehospitalization between borderline PH and non-PH patients (HR = 1.599; 95% CI: 0.833-3.067; = 0.158).
Borderline PH is independently related to increased 3-year mortality in LHF patients. Future research is needed to evaluate whether more close monitoring, and managing with an intensifier improves clinical outcomes in borderline PH caused by LHF.
www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT02164526.
左心衰竭(LHF)患者常伴有肺动脉高压(PH)的发生,这会导致死亡风险增加。最近,PH的诊断标准已从平均肺动脉压(mPAP)≥25 mmHg变为>20 mmHg。尽管如此,临界PH(mPAP:21 - 24 mmHg)对LHF患者预后的影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨临界PH与LHF患者3年临床结局之间的关系。
对2013年1月至2016年11月期间接受右心导管检查(RHC)的LHF患者进行了一项前瞻性队列研究的回顾性分析。主要结局是全因死亡率;次要结局是再次住院。
在344例患者中,分别有62.5%被确定为PH(mPAP≥25),10.8%为临界PH(21 - 24),26.7%为非PH(≤20)。多变量Cox分析显示,临界PH患者的校正死亡风险(HR = 3.822;95% CI:1.043 - 13.999;P = 0.043)高于非PH患者。当将mPAP作为连续变量处理时,从20 mmHg开始,死亡风险比随着mPAP的升高而逐渐增加(HR = 1.006;95% CI:1.001 - 1.012)。临界PH患者和非PH患者之间的校正再次住院率无统计学显著差异(HR = 1.599;95% CI:0.833 - 3.067;P = 0.158)。
临界PH与LHF患者3年死亡率增加独立相关。未来需要进行研究以评估更密切的监测以及使用强化治疗是否能改善由LHF引起的临界PH的临床结局。
www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT02164526。