Dermatology Department, Rio de Janeiro State University (UERJ), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Dermatology Department, UERJ, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Dermatol Surg. 2022 Oct 1;48(10):1092-1096. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000003544. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
Aesthetic procedures are widely performed by dermatologists and plastic surgeons, often with subjective results. In cosmetic dermatology, there is a lack of studies that use accurate instruments to assess result outcomes. Quality of life (QoL) questionnaires can objectively assess results.
To assess the impact of nonsurgical facial cosmetic procedures on QoL.
This was a longitudinal observational study performed with 81 patients who underwent facial cosmetic procedures at a University Hospital in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The Skin Rejuvenation Outcome Evaluation questionnaire, previously adapted and translated to the Portuguese language spoken in Brazil, was selected, and the results were compared with the Dermatology Life Quality Index. The impact on QoL was statistically evaluated after the interventions.
The Skin Rejuvenation Outcome Evaluation scores after the procedures were significantly higher than before ( p < .001), independent of sociodemographic characteristics. Patients treated with botulinum toxin and dermal fillers showed greater satisfaction than those treated with laser, chemical peels or microneedling.
Minimally invasive cosmetic procedures result in improvements in QoL. The use of translated, adapted, and validated questionnaires favors the comparison of results among different populations and reinforces the confidence on the results of established cosmetic treatments.
美容程序由皮肤科医生和整形外科医生广泛开展,其结果通常具有主观性。在美容皮肤科领域,缺乏使用准确仪器评估结果的研究。生活质量(QoL)问卷可以客观评估结果。
评估非手术面部美容程序对 QoL 的影响。
这是一项在巴西里约热内卢的一家大学医院进行的纵向观察性研究,共纳入 81 名接受面部美容程序的患者。选择了先前经过改编和翻译为巴西葡萄牙语的皮肤再生效果评估问卷,并将结果与皮肤病生活质量指数进行比较。干预后对 QoL 的影响进行了统计学评估。
术后皮肤再生效果评估评分明显高于术前(p<0.001),与社会人口学特征无关。接受肉毒毒素和真皮填充治疗的患者比接受激光、化学换肤或微针治疗的患者满意度更高。
微创美容程序可提高 QoL。使用翻译、改编和验证后的问卷有利于在不同人群之间比较结果,并增强对既定美容治疗效果的信心。