• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

研究者对偶然发现的基因组研究结果反馈的看法和经验:一项定性研究。

Perspectives and experiences of researchers regarding feedback of incidental genomic research findings: A qualitative study.

机构信息

Makerere University School of Biomedical Sciences, Kampala, Uganda.

Makerere University School of Business and Management Studies, Kampala, Uganda.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Aug 29;17(8):e0273657. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273657. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0273657
PMID:36037169
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9423610/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is a plethora of unanswered ethical questions about sharing incidental findings in genetics and genomics research. Yet understanding and addressing such issues is necessary for communicating incidental findings with participants. We explored researchers' perspectives and experiences regarding feedback of incidental genomics findings to participants.

METHODS

This was a qualitative study using semi-structured interview schedules for In-depth interviews. Thirty respondents were purposively selected based on role as genetics and genomics researchers in Uganda. Data were analysed through content analysis to identify emerging themes using a comprehensive thematic matrix. QSR International NVivo software was used to support data analysis.

RESULTS

a). On perceptions, sharing of incidental findings was acceptable and four themes emerged including role of professional judgement; role of ethics committees and ethical guidelines; optimal disclosure practices; limits to professional duty and uncertainty and; b). on practices, sharing had been carried out by some researchers and a theme on experience and practices emerged.

CONCLUSION

Feedback of incidental genomics research findings to participants is generally acceptable to researchers. Some researchers. Challenges include lack of ethical guidelines and uncertainty about the findings.

摘要

背景

在遗传学和基因组学研究中,存在大量关于分享偶然发现的未解决的伦理问题。然而,理解和解决这些问题对于与参与者交流偶然发现是必要的。我们探讨了研究人员对向参与者反馈偶然发现的基因组学结果的看法和经验。

方法

这是一项使用半结构式访谈提纲进行深入访谈的定性研究。根据乌干达遗传学和基因组学研究人员的角色,有目的选择了 30 名受访者。通过内容分析,使用综合主题矩阵来识别新兴主题,从而分析数据。使用 QSR International NVivo 软件支持数据分析。

结果

a). 在看法方面,分享偶然发现是可以接受的,出现了四个主题,包括专业判断的作用;伦理委员会和伦理准则的作用;最佳披露做法;专业职责和不确定性的限制;b). 在实践方面,一些研究人员已经进行了分享,出现了一个关于经验和实践的主题。

结论

向参与者反馈偶然发现的基因组学研究结果一般是可以接受的。一些研究人员面临的挑战包括缺乏伦理准则和对这些发现的不确定性。

相似文献

1
Perspectives and experiences of researchers regarding feedback of incidental genomic research findings: A qualitative study.研究者对偶然发现的基因组研究结果反馈的看法和经验:一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 29;17(8):e0273657. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273657. eCollection 2022.
2
Perspectives and ethical considerations for return of genetics and genomics research results: a qualitative study of genomics researchers in Uganda.返回遗传学和基因组学研究结果的观点和伦理考虑:乌干达基因组学研究人员的定性研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Nov 19;22(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00724-1.
3
Ethical framework for the detection, management and communication of incidental findings in imaging studies, building on an interview study of researchers' practices and perspectives.基于对研究人员实践与观点的访谈研究,影像研究中偶发发现的检测、管理及沟通的伦理框架。
BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Feb 6;18(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12910-017-0168-y.
4
Feedback of individual genetic and genomics research results: A qualitative study involving grassroots communities in Uganda.个体遗传和基因组学研究结果的反馈:一项涉及乌干达基层社区的定性研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 18;17(11):e0267375. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267375. eCollection 2022.
5
Disclosure of incidental findings in cancer genomic research: investigators' perceptions on obligations and barriers.癌症基因组研究中偶然发现的披露:研究者对义务和障碍的看法
Clin Genet. 2015 Oct;88(4):320-6. doi: 10.1111/cge.12540. Epub 2014 Dec 9.
6
Perspectives on returning individual and aggregate genomic research results to study participants and communities in Kenya: a qualitative study.肯尼亚对向研究参与者和社区个体和综合基因组研究结果的看法:一项定性研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Mar 18;23(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00767-y.
7
Community engagement in genetics and genomics research: a qualitative study of the perspectives of genetics and genomics researchers in Uganda.社区参与遗传学和基因组学研究:乌干达遗传学和基因组学研究人员观点的定性研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Jan 2;25(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00995-w.
8
Processes and factors involved in decisions regarding return of incidental genomic findings in research.研究中与返回偶然发现的基因组结果相关的决策过程和因素。
Genet Med. 2014 Apr;16(4):311-7. doi: 10.1038/gim.2013.140. Epub 2013 Sep 26.
9
An implementation framework for the feedback of individual research results and incidental findings in research.一项关于研究中个体研究结果及偶发发现反馈的实施框架。
BMC Med Ethics. 2014 Dec 23;15:88. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-15-88.
10
To disclose, or not to disclose? Perspectives of clinical genomics professionals toward returning incidental findings from genomic research.是否披露?临床基因组学专业人员对从基因组研究中返还偶然发现的观点。
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Jul 27;22(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00670-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Research participants and stakeholders' views on feedback of genetic research findings: a qualitative study of the H3Africa Kidney Disease Research Network in Ghana.研究参与者和利益相关者对基因研究结果反馈的看法:加纳H3Africa肾脏疾病研究网络的定性研究
BMC Nephrol. 2025 Jul 8;26(1):366. doi: 10.1186/s12882-025-04295-w.
2
The role of community engagement in promoting research participants' understanding of pharmacogenomic research results: Perspectives of stakeholders involved in HIV/AIDS research and treatment.社区参与在促进研究参与者对药物基因组学研究结果的理解中的作用:参与 HIV/AIDS 研究和治疗的利益相关者的观点。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 2;19(4):e0299081. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299081. eCollection 2024.
3
Awareness, experiences and perceptions regarding genetic testing and the return of genetic and genomics results in a hypothetical research context among patients in Uganda: a qualitative study.乌干达患者在假设研究背景下对基因检测以及基因和基因组结果反馈的认知、经历和看法:一项定性研究
J Med Ethics. 2024 Dec 23;50(12):829-834. doi: 10.1136/jme-2022-108885.

本文引用的文献

1
Guideline for feedback of individual genetic research findings for genomics research in Africa.非洲基因组学研究中个体遗传研究结果反馈指南。
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Jan;7(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007184.
2
Perspectives and ethical considerations for return of genetics and genomics research results: a qualitative study of genomics researchers in Uganda.返回遗传学和基因组学研究结果的观点和伦理考虑:乌干达基因组学研究人员的定性研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Nov 19;22(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00724-1.
3
A scoping review of genetics and genomics research ethics policies and guidelines for Africa.非洲遗传学和基因组学研究伦理政策与指南的范围综述
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Apr 2;22(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00611-9.
4
Researchers' perspectives on return of individual genetics results to research participants: a qualitative study.研究人员对向研究参与者反馈个人基因检测结果的看法:一项定性研究。
Glob Bioeth. 2021 Mar 9;32(1):15-33. doi: 10.1080/11287462.2021.1896453.
5
What constitutes good ethical practice in genomic research in Africa? Perspectives of participants in a genomic research study in Uganda.非洲基因组研究中的良好道德实践包括什么?乌干达一项基因组研究参与者的观点。
Glob Bioeth. 2019 Mar 24;31(1):169-183. doi: 10.1080/11287462.2019.1592867.
6
Do solidarity and reciprocity obligations compel African researchers to feedback individual genetic results in genomics research?团结和互惠义务是否迫使非洲研究人员在基因组学研究中反馈个人基因结果?
BMC Med Ethics. 2020 Nov 4;21(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12910-020-00549-4.
7
Transformation of the Taiwan Biobank 3.0: vertical and horizontal integration.台湾生物银行 3.0 的转型:垂直与水平整合。
J Transl Med. 2020 Aug 6;18(1):304. doi: 10.1186/s12967-020-02451-4.
8
Frequency of genomic secondary findings among 21,915 eMERGE network participants.eMERGE 网络 21915 名参与者中的基因组二级发现频率。
Genet Med. 2020 Sep;22(9):1470-1477. doi: 10.1038/s41436-020-0810-9. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
9
Returning incidental findings in African genomics research.非洲基因组学研究中的偶发发现的返还。
Nat Genet. 2020 Jan;52(1):17-20. doi: 10.1038/s41588-019-0542-4.
10
Preferences for Return of Genetic Results Among Participants in the Jackson Heart Study and Framingham Heart Study.杰克逊心脏研究和弗雷明汉心脏研究参与者对遗传结果返还的偏好。
Circ Genom Precis Med. 2019 Dec;12(12):e002632. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGEN.119.002632. Epub 2019 Nov 22.