Rutakumwa Rwamahe, de Vries Jantina, Parker Michael, Tindana Paulina, Mweemba Oliver, Seeley Janet
Medical Research Council/Uganda Virus Research Institute and London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe, Uganda.
Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Glob Bioeth. 2019 Mar 24;31(1):169-183. doi: 10.1080/11287462.2019.1592867.
Previous research has consistently highlighted the importance of stakeholder engagement in identifying and developing solutions to ethical challenges in genomic research, especially in Africa where such research is relatively new. In this paper, we examine what constitutes good ethical practice in research, from the perspectives of genomic research participants in Uganda. Our study was part of a multi-site qualitative study exploring these issues in Uganda, Ghana and Zambia. We purposively sampled various stakeholders including genomic research participants, researchers, research ethics committee members, policy makers and community members. This paper presents the findings from in-depth interviews with 27 people with diabetes who had participated in a diabetes genomic study. Data were collected using semi-structured interviews. Manual thematic content analysis was conducted using a framework approach. Findings indicate three key requirements that research participants see as vital for genomic research to be more responsive to research participants' needs and contextual realities: (1) de-emphasising the role of experts and institutions in the consenting process, (2) clarity about the timing and nature of feedback both of findings relevant to the health of individuals and about the broad progress of the study, and (3) more effective support for research participants during and after the study.
以往的研究一直强调利益相关者参与确定和制定基因组研究中伦理挑战解决方案的重要性,特别是在非洲,此类研究相对较新。在本文中,我们从乌干达基因组研究参与者的角度,探讨了研究中良好伦理实践的构成要素。我们的研究是在乌干达、加纳和赞比亚探索这些问题的多地点定性研究的一部分。我们有目的地对包括基因组研究参与者、研究人员、研究伦理委员会成员、政策制定者和社区成员在内的各种利益相关者进行了抽样。本文介绍了对27名参与糖尿病基因组研究的糖尿病患者进行深入访谈的结果。数据通过半结构化访谈收集。采用框架法进行了手动主题内容分析。研究结果表明,研究参与者认为基因组研究要更能满足研究参与者的需求和背景实际情况,有三个关键要求:(1)在知情同意过程中淡化专家和机构的作用;(2)明确与个人健康相关的研究结果以及研究总体进展情况的反馈时间和性质;(3)在研究期间和研究之后为研究参与者提供更有效的支持。