• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

遗传血统和邻里社会经济地位对自我认定的非裔美国人全因死亡率的相对影响。

Relative impact of genetic ancestry and neighborhood socioeconomic status on all-cause mortality in self-identified African Americans.

机构信息

Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.

Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Aug 29;17(8):e0273735. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273735. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0273735
PMID:36037186
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9423617/
Abstract

Self-identified race/ethnicity is a correlate of both genetic ancestry and socioeconomic factors, both of which may contribute to racial disparities in mortality. Investigators often hold a priori assumptions, rarely made explicit, regarding the relative importance of these factors. We studied 2,239 self-identified African Americans (SIAA) from the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian screening trial enrolled from 1993-1998 and followed prospectively until 2019 or until death, whichever came first. Percent African genetic ancestry was estimated using the GRAF-Pop distance-based method. A neighborhood socioeconomic status (nSES) index was estimated using census tract measures of income, housing, and employment and linked to participant residence in 2012. We used Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAGs) to represent causal models favoring (1) biomedical and (2) social causes of mortality. Hazard ratios were estimated using Cox models adjusted for sociodemographic, behavioral, and neighborhood covariates guided by each DAG. 901 deaths occurred over 40,767 person-years of follow-up. In unadjusted (biomedical) models, a 10% increase in percent African ancestry was associated with a 7% higher rate of all-cause mortality (HR: 1.07, 95% CI: 1.02, 1.12). This effect was attenuated in covariate adjusted (social) models (aHR: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.96, 1.06). Mortality was lower comparing participants in the highest to lowest nSES quintile following adjustment for covariates and ancestry (aHR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.57, 0.98, Ptrend = 0.017). Higher African ancestry and lower nSES were associated with higher mortality, but African ancestry was not associated with mortality following covariate adjustment. Socioeconomic factors may be more important drivers of mortality in African Americans.

摘要

自我认定的种族/民族是遗传血统和社会经济因素的相关因素,这两个因素都可能导致死亡率的种族差异。研究人员通常持有先验假设,但很少明确说明这些因素的相对重要性。我们研究了 1993 年至 1998 年期间参加前列腺癌、肺癌、结直肠癌和卵巢筛查试验的 2239 名自我认定的非裔美国人(SIAA),并进行了前瞻性随访,直到 2019 年或死亡,以先到者为准。使用基于 GRAF-Pop 距离的方法估计非洲遗传血统的百分比。使用收入、住房和就业的普查区指标来估计邻里社会经济地位(nSES)指数,并将其与 2012 年参与者的居住地联系起来。我们使用有向无环图(DAG)来表示有利于(1)生物医学和(2)社会原因导致死亡率的因果模型。使用 Cox 模型估计风险比,该模型根据每个 DAG 调整了社会人口统计学、行为和邻里因素。在 40767 人年的随访期间,发生了 901 例死亡。在未调整(生物医学)模型中,非洲血统百分比增加 10%与全因死亡率增加 7%相关(HR:1.07,95%CI:1.02,1.12)。在调整了协变量和血统的(社会)模型中,这种影响减弱(aHR:1.01,95%CI:0.96,1.06)。在调整了协变量和血统后,与最低 nSES 五分位组相比,处于最高 nSES 五分位组的参与者死亡率较低(aHR:0.74,95%CI:0.57,0.98,Ptrend=0.017)。较高的非洲血统和较低的 nSES 与较高的死亡率相关,但在调整了协变量后,非洲血统与死亡率无关。社会经济因素可能是非裔美国人死亡率的更重要驱动因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e606/9423617/a0d3f959dec9/pone.0273735.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e606/9423617/0cef2c43563c/pone.0273735.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e606/9423617/a0d3f959dec9/pone.0273735.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e606/9423617/0cef2c43563c/pone.0273735.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e606/9423617/a0d3f959dec9/pone.0273735.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Relative impact of genetic ancestry and neighborhood socioeconomic status on all-cause mortality in self-identified African Americans.遗传血统和邻里社会经济地位对自我认定的非裔美国人全因死亡率的相对影响。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 29;17(8):e0273735. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273735. eCollection 2022.
2
Trends in mortality among Black and White men with prostate cancer in Massachusetts and Pennsylvania: Race and neighborhood socioeconomic position.马萨诸塞州和宾夕法尼亚州黑人与白人前列腺癌患者死亡率趋势:种族和社区社会经济地位。
Cancer. 2021 Jul 15;127(14):2525-2534. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33506. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
3
Joint Associations of Race, Ethnicity, and Socioeconomic Status With Mortality in the Multiethnic Cohort Study.多种族队列研究中种族、民族和社会经济地位与死亡率的联合关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Apr 1;5(4):e226370. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.6370.
4
Neighborhood Disadvantage, African Genetic Ancestry, Cancer Subtype, and Mortality Among Breast Cancer Survivors.社区劣势、非洲遗传血统、癌症亚型与乳腺癌幸存者的死亡率。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Aug 1;6(8):e2331295. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.31295.
5
Neighborhood Socioeconomic Status in Relation to All-Cause, Cancer, and Cardiovascular Mortality in the Black Women's Health Study.社区社会经济地位与黑人女性健康研究中的全因、癌症和心血管死亡率的关系。
Ethn Dis. 2016 Apr 21;26(2):157-64. doi: 10.18865/ed.26.2.157.
6
West African Genetic Ancestry, Neighborhood Deprivation, and Prostate Cancer.西非遗传血统、社区贫困与前列腺癌
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Sep 3;7(9):e2433546. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.33546.
7
Intersection of Race/Ethnicity and Socioeconomic Status in Mortality After Breast Cancer.乳腺癌患者死亡中种族/族裔与社会经济地位的交叉情况
J Community Health. 2015 Dec;40(6):1287-99. doi: 10.1007/s10900-015-0052-y.
8
Neighborhood and Individual Socioeconomic Status and Asthma Incidence in African American Women.非裔美国女性的邻里和个体社会经济地位与哮喘发病率。
Ethn Dis. 2016 Jan 21;26(1):113-22. doi: 10.18865/ed.26.1.113.
9
The Association Between Neighborhood Environment and Mortality: Results from a National Study of Veterans.邻里环境与死亡率之间的关联:一项退伍军人全国性研究的结果
J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Apr;32(4):416-422. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3905-x. Epub 2016 Nov 4.
10
Neighborhood Socioeconomic Status and Cognitive Function in Late Life.晚年邻里社会经济地位与认知功能
Am J Epidemiol. 2016 Jun 15;183(12):1088-97. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwv337. Epub 2016 Jun 2.

引用本文的文献

1
The association between neighborhood socioeconomic status and breast cancer incidence and mortality risk: a large-scale cohort studies systematic review and meta-analysis.社区社会经济地位与乳腺癌发病率和死亡率风险之间的关联:一项大规模队列研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Breast Cancer. 2025 Aug 30. doi: 10.1007/s12282-025-01764-w.
2
African Genetic Ancestry, Structural and Social Determinants of Health, and Mortality in Black Adults.非洲遗传血统、健康的结构和社会决定因素以及成年黑人的死亡率
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 May 1;8(5):e2510016. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.10016.
3
Building research infrastructure to advance precision medicine in colorectal cancer.

本文引用的文献

1
Examining socio-spatial mobility patterns among colon cancer patients after diagnosis.研究结肠癌患者确诊后的社会空间流动模式。
SSM Popul Health. 2022 Jan 7;17:101023. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101023. eCollection 2022 Mar.
2
Comparing Genetic and Socioenvironmental Contributions to Ethnic Differences in C-Reactive Protein.比较遗传因素和社会环境因素对C反应蛋白种族差异的影响。
Front Genet. 2021 Oct 18;12:738485. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.738485. eCollection 2021.
3
Invited Commentary: Comparing Approaches to Measuring Structural Racism.
构建研究基础设施以推动结直肠癌的精准医学发展。
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2025 Apr 30;9(3). doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkaf027.
4
Geospatial Genomics: Operationalizing Multilevel Conceptual Frameworks of Cancer Health Outcomes to Account for Gene-Person-Place Relationships.地理空间基因组学:将癌症健康结果的多层次概念框架付诸实践,以考量基因-人-环境关系。
J Clin Oncol. 2025 May;43(13):1534-1538. doi: 10.1200/JCO.24.00751. Epub 2025 Feb 12.
5
Addressing Health Disparities in Hematologic Malignancies: from Genes to Outreach.解决血液系统恶性肿瘤中的健康差距:从基因到外展服务
Blood Cancer Discov. 2025 Mar 4;6(2):79-93. doi: 10.1158/2643-3230.BCD-24-0153.
6
The impact of Indigenous American-like ancestry on risk of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in Hispanic/Latino children.美洲原住民样血统对西班牙裔/拉丁裔儿童急性淋巴细胞白血病风险的影响。
medRxiv. 2025 Jan 15:2025.01.14.25320563. doi: 10.1101/2025.01.14.25320563.
7
Public funding and young children vaccination coverage: Evidence from Socialist-Oriented Market Economy.公共资金与幼儿疫苗接种覆盖率:来自社会主义导向市场经济的证据
Health Econ Rev. 2024 Nov 20;14(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s13561-024-00569-5.
8
West African Genetic Ancestry, Neighborhood Deprivation, and Prostate Cancer.西非遗传血统、社区贫困与前列腺癌
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Sep 3;7(9):e2433546. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.33546.
9
Social Genomic Determinants of Health: Understanding the Molecular Pathways by Which Neighborhood Disadvantage Affects Cancer Outcomes.社会基因组学与健康:了解邻里劣势影响癌症结局的分子途径。
J Clin Oncol. 2024 Oct 20;42(30):3618-3627. doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.02780. Epub 2024 Aug 23.
10
Genetic ancestry is related to potential sources of breast cancer health disparities among Colombian women.遗传背景与哥伦比亚女性乳腺癌健康差异的潜在来源有关。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 27;19(6):e0306037. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306037. eCollection 2024.
特邀评论:比较衡量结构性种族主义的方法。
Am J Epidemiol. 2022 Mar 24;191(4):548-551. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwab261.
4
Measuring Structural Racism: A Guide for Epidemiologists and Other Health Researchers.测量结构性种族主义:流行病学学家和其他健康研究人员指南。
Am J Epidemiol. 2022 Mar 24;191(4):539-547. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwab239.
5
Socioeconomic deprivation and genetic ancestry interact to modify type 2 diabetes ethnic disparities in the United Kingdom.在英国,社会经济剥夺与遗传血统相互作用,改变了2型糖尿病的种族差异。
EClinicalMedicine. 2021 Jun 14;37:100960. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100960. eCollection 2021 Jul.
6
Toward a fine-scale population health monitoring system.迈向精细化的人口健康监测系统。
Cell. 2021 Apr 15;184(8):2068-2083.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.03.034.
7
Association of Genetic West African Ancestry, Blood Pressure Response to Therapy, and Cardiovascular Risk Among Self-reported Black Individuals in the Systolic Blood Pressure Reduction Intervention Trial (SPRINT).在收缩压降低干预试验(SPRINT)中自我报告为黑人的个体中,西非遗传血统、血压治疗反应与心血管风险之间的关联。
JAMA Cardiol. 2021 Apr 1;6(4):388-398. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.6566.
8
Impact of residential mobility on estimated environmental exposures in a prospective cohort of older women.居住流动性对老年女性前瞻性队列中估计的环境暴露的影响。
Environ Epidemiol. 2020 Aug 24;4(5):e110. doi: 10.1097/EE9.0000000000000110. eCollection 2020 Oct.
9
Leveraging genetic ancestry to study health disparities.利用遗传背景研究健康差异。
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2021 Jun;175(2):363-375. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.24144. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
10
Racial Differences in Genomic Profiling of Prostate Cancer.前列腺癌基因组分析中的种族差异
N Engl J Med. 2020 Sep 10;383(11):1083-1085. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2000069.