• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非洲遗传血统、健康的结构和社会决定因素以及成年黑人的死亡率

African Genetic Ancestry, Structural and Social Determinants of Health, and Mortality in Black Adults.

作者信息

Iyer Hari S, Cheng Iona, Opara Chidinma, Lin Katherine, Zeinomar Nur, Le Marchand Loïc, Wilkens Lynne, Shariff-Marco Salma, Conti David V, Haiman Christopher A, Gomez Scarlett L, Rebbeck Timothy R

机构信息

Section of Cancer Epidemiology and Health Outcomes, Rutgers Cancer Institute, New Brunswick, New Jersey.

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2025 May 1;8(5):e2510016. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.10016.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.10016
PMID:40358946
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12076178/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Although structural and social determinants of health (SSDH) have been consistently associated with health disparities, percentage African genetic ancestry (AGA) has been suggested as a risk factor associated with common diseases in Black populations. Appropriate use and interpretation of percentage AGA in understanding health disparities has been complicated by the fact that percentage AGA is correlated with genetic and nongenetic factors.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate associations of SSDH with mortality in the context of percentage AGA and how percentage AGA is correlated with SSDH.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study investigated data from the Multiethnic Cohort (MEC) Study, in which participants were enrolled from 1993 through 1996 and followed up until death or censoring on December 31, 2019. Participant data were analyzed between March and June 2023. The population-based sample was predominantly from Los Angeles County, California, consisting of self-identified Black adults aged 45 to 75 years who enrolled into the MEC Study; completed a baseline demographic, clinical, and lifestyle questionnaire; and provided biospecimens.

EXPOSURES

The Index of Concentration at the Extremes (ICE), capturing social polarization based on income and racial composition, and a neighborhood socioeconomic status (NSES) index were computed from the 1990 Census, scaled to county-specific quintiles, and linked to residential census tracts at study enrollment. Percentage AGA was estimated using 21 431 single-nucleotide variations based on similarity with African continental referent data.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Multivariable hazard ratios (HRs) for all-cause mortality were estimated from Cox models. Correlation of percentage AGA with SSDH measures was described.

RESULTS

After exclusions, 9685 participants were included (mean [SD] age, 61.0 [8.9] years; 5593 female [57.7%]), with a mean (SD) percentage AGA of 75.0% (14.0%). There were 5504 deaths over 204 463 person-years of follow-up. Comparing the most with least advantaged quintile, income ICE (adjusted HR [aHR], 1.30; 95% CI, 1.16-1.45) and NSES (aHR, 1.37, 95% CI, 1.20-1.56) were associated with lower all-cause mortality. Minimal changes were observed after adjusting for percentage AGA; for example, comparing the most with least advantaged quintile, NSES (aHR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.19-1.55) remained associated with lower all-cause mortality. There was no association between percentage AGA and mortality after adjustment (aHR per 10-percentage point change in percentage AGA, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.99-1.03).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this study, associations of SSDH with mortality persisted with adjustment for percentage AGA. Findings support the hypothesis that SSDH should be the primary factors to consider for eliminating health disparities.

摘要

重要性

尽管健康的结构和社会决定因素(SSDH)一直与健康差距相关,但非洲遗传血统百分比(AGA)被认为是与黑人人群常见疾病相关的一个风险因素。由于AGA百分比与遗传和非遗传因素相关,因此在理解健康差距时对AGA百分比的恰当使用和解释变得复杂。

目的

在AGA百分比的背景下评估SSDH与死亡率之间的关联,以及AGA百分比与SSDH的相关性。

设计、背景和参与者:这项队列研究调查了多族裔队列(MEC)研究的数据,该研究的参与者于1993年至1996年入组,并随访至2019年12月31日死亡或失访。参与者数据于2023年3月至6月进行分析。该基于人群的样本主要来自加利福尼亚州洛杉矶县,由年龄在45至75岁之间、自我认定为黑人的成年参与者组成,他们参加了MEC研究;完成了一份基线人口统计学、临床和生活方式问卷;并提供了生物样本。

暴露因素

根据1990年人口普查计算出极端浓度指数(ICE),该指数基于收入和种族构成反映社会两极分化,以及邻里社会经济地位(NSES)指数,将其缩放到特定县的五分位数,并与研究入组时的居住普查区相关联。基于与非洲大陆参考数据的相似性,使用21431个单核苷酸变异估计AGA百分比。

主要结局和测量指标

通过Cox模型估计全因死亡率的多变量风险比(HR)。描述了AGA百分比与SSDH测量指标之间的相关性。

结果

排除后,纳入了9685名参与者(平均[标准差]年龄为61.0[8.9]岁;5593名女性[57.7%]),AGA百分比的平均值(标准差)为75.0%(14.0%)。在204463人年的随访期间有5504人死亡。将最具优势的五分位数与最不具优势的五分位数进行比较,收入ICE(调整后HR[aHR],1.30;95%置信区间,1.16 - 1.45)和NSES(aHR,1.37,95%置信区间,1.20 - 1.56)与较低的全因死亡率相关。在调整AGA百分比后观察到的变化最小;例如,将最具优势的五分位数与最不具优势的五分位数进行比较,NSES(aHR,1.36;95%置信区间,1.19 - 1.55)仍然与较低的全因死亡率相关。调整后AGA百分比与死亡率之间无关联(AGA百分比每变化10个百分点的aHR为1.01;95%置信区间,0.99 - 1.03)。

结论及意义

在本研究中,对AGA百分比进行调整后,SSDH与死亡率之间的关联仍然存在。研究结果支持以下假设,即SSDH应是消除健康差距时需考虑的主要因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/211e/12076178/034859f5a39b/jamanetwopen-e2510016-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/211e/12076178/dfaa401ef2ee/jamanetwopen-e2510016-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/211e/12076178/e1caffd9910a/jamanetwopen-e2510016-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/211e/12076178/034859f5a39b/jamanetwopen-e2510016-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/211e/12076178/dfaa401ef2ee/jamanetwopen-e2510016-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/211e/12076178/e1caffd9910a/jamanetwopen-e2510016-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/211e/12076178/034859f5a39b/jamanetwopen-e2510016-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
African Genetic Ancestry, Structural and Social Determinants of Health, and Mortality in Black Adults.非洲遗传血统、健康的结构和社会决定因素以及成年黑人的死亡率
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 May 1;8(5):e2510016. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.10016.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Neighborhood Socioeconomic Disadvantage Across the Life Course and Premature Mortality.一生中的邻里社会经济劣势与过早死亡。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Aug 1;7(8):e2426243. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.26243.
4
Sleep Trajectories and All-Cause Mortality Among Low-Income Adults.低收入成年人的睡眠轨迹与全因死亡率
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Feb 3;8(2):e2462117. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.62117.
5
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.一种新的量化社会健康指标与寻求肌肉骨骼专科护理的患者的不适程度、能力以及心理和总体健康水平相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
6
Racial and ethnic disparities in fecundability: a North American preconception cohort study.生育力方面的种族和族裔差异:一项北美孕前队列研究。
Hum Reprod. 2025 Apr 17. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaf067.
7
Sex as a prognostic factor for mortality in adults with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism.性别作为急性症状性肺栓塞成年患者死亡率的一个预后因素。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 20;3(3):CD013835. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013835.pub2.
8
Are Detailed, Patient-level Social Determinant of Health Factors Associated With Physical Function and Mental Health at Presentation Among New Patients With Orthopaedic Conditions?详细的患者层面的健康社会决定因素是否与新骨科患者就诊时的身体功能和心理健康相关?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 May 1;481(5):912-921. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002446. Epub 2022 Oct 6.
9
Hospital Patient Demographics and Administration of Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke.急性缺血性卒中患者的医院人口统计学特征及静脉溶栓治疗
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Feb 3;8(2):e2462271. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.62271.
10
Allostatic Load and Racial and Rural Disparities in Breast Cancer Survival.乳腺癌生存中的应激负荷与种族及农村差异
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Aug 1;8(8):e2528019. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.28019.

引用本文的文献

1
Influence of Genomic Ancestry and Other Traditional Risk Factors on the Prevalence of Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy in Admixed Individuals With Type 1 Diabetes in Brazil: A Pioneer Multicenter Study.基因组血统和其他传统风险因素对巴西1型糖尿病混合个体中糖尿病周围神经病变患病率的影响:一项开创性的多中心研究。
J Peripher Nerv Syst. 2025 Sep;30(3):e70049. doi: 10.1111/jns.70049.
2
Genetic Ancestry, Structural Racism, Social Determinants of Health, and Mortality Among Black Adults.黑人成年人的遗传血统、结构性种族主义、健康的社会决定因素与死亡率
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 May 1;8(5):e2510024. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.10024.

本文引用的文献

1
Black:White Health Inequalities, Genes Versus Environment-A New Chapter?黑人与白人的健康不平等:基因与环境——新篇章?
Ethn Dis. 2023 Mar 31;33(1):51-54. doi: 10.18865/1731. eCollection 2023 Jan.
2
Neighborhood Deprivation, Race and Ethnicity, and Prostate Cancer Outcomes Across California Health Care Systems.社区贫困程度、种族和民族与加利福尼亚医疗保健系统中前列腺癌治疗效果的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Mar 4;7(3):e242852. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.2852.
3
Guidance on Use of Race, Ethnicity, and Geographic Origin as Proxies for Genetic Ancestry Groups in Biomedical Publications.
关于在生物医学出版物中使用种族、民族和地理起源作为遗传祖先群体代理的指南。
JAMA. 2024 Apr 16;331(15):1276-1278. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.3737.
4
'All of Us' genetics chart stirs unease over controversial depiction of race.“我们所有人”基因图谱引发对种族争议性描绘的不安。
Nature. 2024 Feb 23. doi: 10.1038/d41586-024-00568-w.
5
Genomic data in the All of Us Research Program.全美国研究计划中的基因组数据。
Nature. 2024 Mar;627(8003):340-346. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06957-x. Epub 2024 Feb 19.
6
Deaths: Leading Causes for 2020.死亡:2020 年的主要死因。
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2023 Dec;72(13):1-115.
7
An essential goal within reach: attaining diversity, equity, and inclusion for the Journal of the National Cancer Institute journals.一个触手可及的重要目标:为《国家癌症研究所杂志》系列期刊实现多元化、公平性和包容性。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2023 Oct 9;115(10):1115-1120. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djad177.
8
Neighborhood Disadvantage, African Genetic Ancestry, Cancer Subtype, and Mortality Among Breast Cancer Survivors.社区劣势、非洲遗传血统、癌症亚型与乳腺癌幸存者的死亡率。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Aug 1;6(8):e2331295. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.31295.
9
Evolutionary Genetics and Admixture in African Populations.非洲人群的进化遗传学与混合。
Genome Biol Evol. 2023 Apr 6;15(4). doi: 10.1093/gbe/evad054.
10
Air Pollution and Mortality at the Intersection of Race and Social Class.空气污染与种族和社会阶层交叉处的死亡率。
N Engl J Med. 2023 Apr 13;388(15):1396-1404. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa2300523. Epub 2023 Mar 24.