Suppr超能文献

确定颈部疼痛患者颈椎手法治疗后发生治疗后非严重不良事件相关的患者特征。

Identifying Patient Characteristics Associated With the Occurrence of Post Treatment Non-serious Adverse Events After Cervical Spine Manual Therapy Treatment in Patients With Neck Pain.

作者信息

Peters Renske, Schmitt Maarten, Mutsaers Bert, Buyl Ronald, Verhagen Arianne, Pool-Goudzwaard Annelies, Koes Bart

机构信息

SOMT, University of Physiotherapy, Amersfoort, The Netherlands; Erasmus Medical Centre, Department of General Practice, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Rotterdam Hogeschool, University of Applied Science, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2023 Feb;104(2):277-286. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2022.08.007. Epub 2022 Aug 28.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare prevalence rates of serious and non-serious adverse events after manipulation and mobilization and to identify risk factors of serious and non-serious adverse events following 4 types of manual therapy treatment in patients with neck pain.

DESIGN

A prospective cohort study in primary care manual therapy practice.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with neck pain (N=686) provided data on adverse events after 1014 manipulation treatments, 829 mobilization treatments, 437 combined manipulation and mobilization treatments, and 891 treatments consisting of "other treatment modality".

INTERVENTIONS

Usual care manual therapy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

A chi-square test was performed to explore differences in prevalence rates. Logistic regression analysis was performed within the 4 treatment groups. A priori we defined associations between patient-characteristics and adverse events of odds ratio (OR)>2 or OR<0.5 as clinically relevant.

RESULTS

No serious adverse events, such as cervical artery dissection or stroke, were reported. With regard to non-serious adverse events, we found that these are common after manual therapy treatment: prevalence rates are ranging from 0.3% to 64.7%. We found a statistically significant difference between the 4 types of treatments, detrimental to mobilization treatment. Logistic regression analysis resulted in 3 main predictors related to non-serious adverse events after manual therapy treatment: smoking (OR ranges from 2.10 [95% confidence interval [CI] 1.37-3.11] to 3.33 [95% CI 1.83-5.93]), the presence of comorbidity (OR ranges from 2.32 [95% CI 1.22-4.44] to 3.88 [95% CI 1.62-9.26]), and female sex (OR ranges from 0.22 [95% CI 0.11-0.46] to 0.49 [95% CI 0.28-0.86]).

CONCLUSION

There is a significant difference in the occurrence of non-serious adverse events after mobilization compared with manipulation or a combination of manipulation and mobilization. Non-serious adverse events in manual therapy practice are common and are associated with smoking and the presence of comorbidity. In addition, women are more likely to report non-serious adverse events.

摘要

目的

比较手法治疗和松动治疗后严重及非严重不良事件的发生率,并确定颈痛患者接受4种手法治疗后严重及非严重不良事件的风险因素。

设计

在初级保健手法治疗实践中的一项前瞻性队列研究。

参与者

颈痛患者(N = 686)提供了1014次手法治疗、829次松动治疗、437次手法与松动联合治疗以及891次“其他治疗方式”治疗后不良事件的数据。

干预措施

常规护理手法治疗。

主要观察指标

进行卡方检验以探讨发生率的差异。在4个治疗组内进行逻辑回归分析。我们事先将患者特征与比值比(OR)>2或OR<0.5的不良事件之间的关联定义为具有临床相关性。

结果

未报告严重不良事件,如颈动脉夹层或中风。关于非严重不良事件,我们发现这些在手法治疗后很常见:发生率在0.3%至64.7%之间。我们发现4种治疗类型之间存在统计学上的显著差异,对松动治疗不利。逻辑回归分析得出与手法治疗后非严重不良事件相关的3个主要预测因素:吸烟(OR范围从2.10 [95%置信区间(CI)1.37 - 3.11]至3.33 [95% CI 1.83 - 5.93])、合并症的存在(OR范围从2.32 [95% CI 1.22 - 4.44]至3.88 [95% CI 1.62 - 9.26])以及女性(OR范围从0.22 [95% CI 0.11 - 0.46]至0.49 [95% CI 0.28 - 0.86])。

结论

与手法治疗或手法与松动联合治疗相比,松动治疗后非严重不良事件的发生率存在显著差异。手法治疗实践中的非严重不良事件很常见,且与吸烟和合并症的存在有关。此外,女性更有可能报告非严重不良事件。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验