Department for Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Aarhus University, Denmark.
Department for Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Aarhus University, Denmark.
J Affect Disord. 2022 Nov 15;317:373-387. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.08.060. Epub 2022 Aug 28.
Psychomotor retardation has long been recognized as a major feature of depression, and anxiety disorders have been linked with freeze and flight motor responses. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed a) to synthesize available evidence of motor alterations comparing individuals with depression and anxiety disorders to healthy individuals and b) to evaluate the effect of experimental manipulations of motor displays within these clinical groups.
The databases PubMed and PsycINFO were searched for studies either assessing motor differences between clinical and healthy control groups or manipulating the motor system within a clinical group.
The literature search yielded 87 relevant papers, comprising 82 studies comparing a clinical group to a healthy group and 5 studies investigating motor manipulations within a clinical sample. The results of the meta-analysis (K = 71) indicated a statistically significant combined estimate of differences between healthy and clinical groups (g = 0.38 [0.31, 0.45], adjusted for publication bias g = 0.26 [0.19, 0.33]) of a small size. This effect did not vary according to type of disorder (anxiety vs. depression, p = .468). From a narrative review of experimental studies within clinical groups, four out of five studies reported statistically significant effects of manipulating the motor system on affective outcomes.
This synthesis adds to the accumulating empirical evidence of motor alterations in depression and anxiety disorders. Future research will need to investigate how individuals suffering from depression or anxiety disorders could benefit from psychological, behavioral, and physical interventions directly aimed at the motor system.
精神运动迟缓长期以来一直被认为是抑郁症的一个主要特征,而焦虑症与冻结和逃避运动反应有关。本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在:a)综合比较抑郁和焦虑障碍患者与健康个体的运动改变的现有证据;b)评估在这些临床人群中对运动表现进行实验操作的效果。
在 PubMed 和 PsycINFO 数据库中搜索评估临床组和健康对照组之间运动差异的研究,或在临床组内操纵运动系统的研究。
文献检索产生了 87 篇相关论文,其中包括 82 项比较临床组与健康组的研究和 5 项在临床样本中调查运动操作的研究。荟萃分析的结果(K=71)表明,健康组和临床组之间存在统计学上显著的差异(g=0.38[0.31, 0.45],校正出版偏倚后 g=0.26[0.19, 0.33]),差异较小。这种效应不因疾病类型(焦虑症与抑郁症,p=0.468)而异。从对临床组内实验研究的叙述性综述来看,五项研究中有四项报告了操纵运动系统对情感结果的统计学显著影响。
这一综合研究增加了越来越多的抑郁和焦虑障碍中运动改变的实证证据。未来的研究将需要调查患有抑郁或焦虑症的个体如何从直接针对运动系统的心理、行为和身体干预中受益。