Department of Cardiac Anesthesia, Ozone Anesthesia Group, Aurangabad, Maharashtra, India.
Department of Cardiac Anesthesia, Madras Medical Mission, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2022 Dec;36(12):4289-4295. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2022.07.017. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
The objective of this multicenter study was to test the hypothesis of whether the use of a video laryngoscope (VL) reduces complications related to transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) probe insertion.
A multicenter randomized control study.
At 5 tertiary care level hospitals.
Three hundred sixty-three adult patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery.
The patients were randomized into 2 groups-the conventional group (C group; n = 177) and the VL group (n = 186) for TEE probe insertion.
The primary endpoint of the study was the incidence of oropharyngeal injury, which was defined as blood at the tip of the TEE probe at the end of surgery and/or evidence of injury on VL examination at the end of surgery. The secondary endpoints of the study were the number of attempts required for successful TEE probe insertion and the relation between the esophageal inlet and the larynx. There was a higher incidence of injuries in the C group (n = 26; 14.7%) compared to the VL group (n = 14; 7.5%; p = 0.029). The number of attempts for probe insertion was significantly lower in the VL group (p = 0.0023). The most common relation between the esophageal inlet and the larynx was posterolateral (n = 88; 47%), followed by posterior (n = 77; 41%) and lateral (n = 21;12%).
The use of VL was associated with a lesser incidence of injury compared to the conventional technique, and its use for this purpose is recommended. The use of VL for probe insertion resulted in fewer attempts compared with the conventional technique. Significant variations do exist in the relation between the esophageal inlet and the larynx, and direct visualization with VL may contribute to better safety.
本多中心研究旨在验证使用视频喉镜(VL)是否能降低经食管超声心动图(TEE)探头插入相关并发症这一假说。
多中心随机对照研究。
在 5 家三级护理水平的医院进行。
363 名择期行心脏手术的成年患者。
患者被随机分为 2 组,即常规组(C 组;n=177)和 VL 组(n=186)进行 TEE 探头插入。
研究的主要终点是口咽损伤的发生率,定义为手术结束时 TEE 探头尖端有血,和/或手术结束时 VL 检查有损伤的证据。研究的次要终点是成功插入 TEE 探头所需的尝试次数,以及食管入口与喉之间的关系。C 组(n=26;14.7%)损伤发生率明显高于 VL 组(n=14;7.5%;p=0.029)。VL 组探头插入次数明显减少(p=0.0023)。食管入口与喉之间最常见的关系是后外侧(n=88;47%),其次是后位(n=77;41%)和侧位(n=21;12%)。
与传统技术相比,使用 VL 与损伤发生率较低相关,建议将其用于此目的。与传统技术相比,VL 用于探头插入可减少尝试次数。食管入口与喉之间确实存在显著差异,VL 的直接可视化可能有助于提高安全性。