Rehabilitation Unit, Kyoto University Hospital, 54 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan.
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya University, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya 466-8550, Japan.
Respir Investig. 2022 Nov;60(6):847-851. doi: 10.1016/j.resinv.2022.07.003. Epub 2022 Aug 26.
Respiratory muscle weakness has attracted attention because sarcopenia and respiratory muscle dysfunction may play a key role in the development of respiratory failure. To evaluate respiratory muscle strength appropriately, individual factors such as sex, age, body size, and ethnicity should be considered. This study aimed to compare equations available in Japan and other countries for predicting respiratory muscle strength. We tested 21 equations for maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) and 17 for maximal expiratory pressure (MEP) for each sex (76 equations in total) in 159 normal, healthy subjects. We observed wide variations in the overall agreement among the MIP and MEP equations. Some equations showed a proper normal distribution, with median values of almost 100%, and the Japanese equations released in 1997 generally showed the best distributions of both %MIP and %MEP. We can conclude that it is better to use Japanese equations when evaluating respiratory muscle strength in Japanese subjects.
呼吸肌无力已经引起了关注,因为肌少症和呼吸肌肉功能障碍可能在呼吸衰竭的发展中起关键作用。为了适当地评估呼吸肌力量,应考虑个体因素,如性别、年龄、体型和种族。本研究旨在比较日本和其他国家可用的预测呼吸肌力量的公式。我们对 159 名正常健康受试者的每一种性别(共 76 个公式)进行了最大吸气压力(MIP)和最大呼气压力(MEP)的 21 个公式和 17 个公式的测试。我们观察到 MIP 和 MEP 公式之间的整体一致性存在很大差异。一些公式显示出适当的正态分布,中位数接近 100%,1997 年发布的日本公式在%MIP 和%MEP 的分布上普遍表现最佳。我们可以得出结论,在评估日本受试者的呼吸肌力量时,最好使用日本公式。