• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经颅多普勒超声检查行颈动脉血运重建术中血流转流下的脑监测。

Cerebral monitoring during transcarotid artery revascularization with flow reversal via transcranial doppler ultrasound examination.

机构信息

Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.

Department of Interventional Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2021 Jan;73(1):125-131. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.03.051. Epub 2020 Apr 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2020.03.051
PMID:32334047
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7577965/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) is a hybrid technique for carotid artery revascularization that relies on proximal carotid occlusion with flow reversal for distal embolic protection. The hemodynamic response of the intracranial circulation to flow reversal is unknown. In addition, the rate and pattern of cerebral embolization during flow reversal has yet to be investigated. The aim of this study was to characterize cerebral hemodynamic and embolization patterns during TCAR.

METHODS

A single-institution retrospective study of patients with carotid artery stenosis undergoing TCAR with intraoperative transcranial Doppler (TCD) monitoring of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) was performed. Primary outcomes included changes in MCA velocity and MCA embolic signals observed throughout TCAR.

RESULTS

Eleven patients underwent TCAR with TCD monitoring of the ipsilateral MCA. The average MCA velocity at baseline was 50.6 ± 16.4 cm/s. MCA flow decreased significantly upon initiation of flow reversal (50.5 ± 16.4 cm/s vs 19.1 ± 18.4 cm/s; P = .02). The reinitiation of antegrade flow resulted in a significant increase in the number of embolic events compared with baseline (P = .003), and embolic events were observed in two patients during flow reversal.

CONCLUSIONS

TCD monitoring of patients undergoing TCAR revealed that the initiation of flow reversal results in a decrement in ipsilateral MCA velocity. Furthermore, embolic events can occur during flow reversal and are significantly associated with the reinitiation of antegrade flow in the internal carotid artery. However, both of these hemodynamic events were well-tolerated in our cohort. These findings suggest that TCAR remains a safe neuroprotective strategy for carotid revascularization.

摘要

目的

经颈动脉血管重建术(TCAR)是一种颈动脉血运重建的杂交技术,它依赖于近端颈动脉闭塞和血流反转来实现远端栓塞保护。目前尚不清楚颅内循环对血流反转的血液动力学反应。此外,血流反转过程中脑栓塞的速度和模式尚未得到研究。本研究旨在描述 TCAR 期间的脑血液动力学和栓塞模式。

方法

对行 TCAR 并术中经颅多普勒(TCD)监测大脑中动脉(MCA)的颈动脉狭窄患者进行单中心回顾性研究。主要结局包括在整个 TCAR 过程中观察到的 MCA 速度和 MCA 栓塞信号的变化。

结果

11 例患者接受了 TCAR 治疗,并进行了 TCD 监测同侧 MCA。MCA 速度的基线平均为 50.6±16.4cm/s。在开始进行血流反转时,MCA 血流显著减少(50.5±16.4cm/s 比 19.1±18.4cm/s;P=0.02)。与基线相比,重新开始顺行血流时,栓塞事件的数量显著增加(P=0.003),并且在两名患者中观察到血流反转期间发生栓塞事件。

结论

对行 TCAR 的患者进行 TCD 监测显示,开始血流反转会导致同侧 MCA 速度降低。此外,血流反转期间可能发生栓塞事件,并且与颈内动脉重新开始顺行血流显著相关。然而,我们的队列中很好地耐受了这两种血液动力学事件。这些发现表明 TCAR 仍然是一种安全的神经保护策略,用于颈动脉血运重建。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fca1/7577965/493d3a16b507/nihms-1587144-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fca1/7577965/46a115090eaa/nihms-1587144-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fca1/7577965/d28f6cecaec4/nihms-1587144-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fca1/7577965/493d3a16b507/nihms-1587144-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fca1/7577965/46a115090eaa/nihms-1587144-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fca1/7577965/d28f6cecaec4/nihms-1587144-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fca1/7577965/493d3a16b507/nihms-1587144-f0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Cerebral monitoring during transcarotid artery revascularization with flow reversal via transcranial doppler ultrasound examination.经颅多普勒超声检查行颈动脉血运重建术中血流转流下的脑监测。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Jan;73(1):125-131. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.03.051. Epub 2020 Apr 22.
2
The role of transfemoral carotid artery stenting with proximal balloon occlusion embolic protection in the contemporary endovascular management of carotid artery stenosis.经股动脉颈动脉支架置入术联合近端球囊阻断栓塞保护在当代颈动脉狭窄血管内治疗中的作用。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Nov;72(5):1701-1710. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.02.036. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
3
Transcranial Doppler monitoring of transcervical carotid stenting with flow reversal protection: a novel carotid revascularization technique.经颅多普勒监测经颈颈动脉支架置入术并采用血流逆转保护:一种新型颈动脉血管重建技术。
Stroke. 2006 Nov;37(11):2846-9. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000244781.68371.59. Epub 2006 Sep 28.
4
Outcomes of transfemoral carotid artery stenting and transcarotid artery revascularization for restenosis after prior ipsilateral carotid endarterectomy.经股动脉颈动脉支架置入术和颈动脉内膜切除术治疗同侧颈动脉再狭窄后的转颈动脉血运重建术的结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Feb;75(2):561-571.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.07.245. Epub 2021 Sep 8.
5
Outcomes of Transcarotid Artery Revascularization and Carotid Endarterectomy at a Single Institution.单中心颈动脉血运重建术与颈动脉内膜切除术的结果。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2021 May;73:329-335. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.10.023. Epub 2020 Nov 26.
6
Anesthetic choice during transcarotid artery revascularization and carotid endarterectomy affects the risk of myocardial infarction.经颈动脉血管重建术和颈动脉内膜切除术期间的麻醉选择会影响心肌梗死风险。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Oct;74(4):1281-1289. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.03.037. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
7
Analysis of the ROADSTER pivotal and extended-access cohorts shows excellent 1-year durability of transcarotid stenting with dynamic flow reversal.ROADSTER 关键和扩展准入队列分析显示,使用动态血流反转行颈动脉支架术具有优异的 1 年耐久性。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Jun;69(6):1786-1796. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.08.179. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
8
Primary mechanism of stroke reduction in transcarotid artery revascularization is dynamic flow reversal.经颈动脉血运重建术降低中风风险的主要机制是动态血流逆转。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Jul;74(1):187-194. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.10.082. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
9
Propensity-Matched Outcomes of Transcarotid Artery Revascularization Versus Carotid Endarterectomy.经颈动脉血管重建术与颈动脉内膜切除术的倾向匹配结果
J Surg Res. 2020 Aug;252:22-29. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.12.003. Epub 2020 Mar 26.
10
Transcervical Carotid Stenting With Dynamic Flow Reversal Demonstrates Embolization Rates Comparable to Carotid Endarterectomy.经颈颈动脉支架置入术联合动态血流逆转显示栓塞率与颈动脉内膜切除术相当。
J Endovasc Ther. 2016 Apr;23(2):249-54. doi: 10.1177/1526602815626561. Epub 2016 Jan 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimal Cerebral Protection Confirmed by Transcranial Doppler During Transcarotid Artery Revascularization.经颈动脉血管重建术中经颅多普勒证实的最佳脑保护
Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2024 Dec 26;20(1):106-112. doi: 10.14797/mdcvj.1465. eCollection 2024.
2
The intracranial effects of flow reversal during transcarotid artery revascularization.经颈动脉血管重建术中血流逆转的颅内影响。
Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg. 2024 Apr 30;32(2):123-131. doi: 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2024.25700. eCollection 2024 Apr.
3
Outcomes of transcarotid artery revascularization: A systematic review.

本文引用的文献

1
Analysis of the ROADSTER pivotal and extended-access cohorts shows excellent 1-year durability of transcarotid stenting with dynamic flow reversal.ROADSTER 关键和扩展准入队列分析显示,使用动态血流反转行颈动脉支架术具有优异的 1 年耐久性。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Jun;69(6):1786-1796. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.08.179. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
2
Transcarotid Artery Revascularization With Flow Reversal.血流逆转的经颈动脉血管重建术。
J Endovasc Ther. 2017 Apr;24(2):265-270. doi: 10.1177/1526602817693607. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
3
Transcranial Doppler Monitoring in Carotid Endarterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
经颈动脉血运重建术的结果:一项系统性综述。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2024 Jun;30(3):396-403. doi: 10.1177/15910199221123283. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
颈动脉内膜切除术的经颅多普勒监测:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Ultrasound Med. 2017 Mar;36(3):621-630. doi: 10.7863/ultra.16.02077. Epub 2017 Jan 27.
4
Results of the ROADSTER multicenter trial of transcarotid stenting with dynamic flow reversal.ROADSTER经颈动脉支架置入术联合动态血流逆转多中心试验的结果
J Vasc Surg. 2015 Nov;62(5):1227-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.04.460.
5
Transcranial Doppler Ultrasound in the Current Era of Carotid Artery Stenting.颈动脉支架置入术当前时代的经颅多普勒超声
Ultraschall Med. 2015 Aug;36(4):337-41. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1366677. Epub 2014 Jun 25.
6
Safety and feasibility of a novel transcervical access neuroprotection system for carotid artery stenting in the PROOF Study.在 PROOF 研究中,新型经颈入路神经保护系统在颈动脉支架置入术中的安全性和可行性。
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Nov;54(5):1317-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.04.040. Epub 2011 Jun 12.
7
New ischaemic brain lesions on MRI after stenting or endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis: a substudy of the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS).症状性颈动脉狭窄支架置入或内膜切除术治疗后 MRI 新出现的缺血性脑损伤:国际颈动脉支架研究(ICSS)的一个亚研究。
Lancet Neurol. 2010 Apr;9(4):353-62. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70057-0. Epub 2010 Feb 25.
8
Efficacy of a proximal occlusion catheter with reversal of flow in the prevention of embolic events during carotid artery stenting: an experimental analysis.一种具有血流逆转功能的近端闭塞导管在预防颈动脉支架置入术中栓塞事件的疗效:一项实验分析。
J Vasc Surg. 2001 Mar;33(3):504-9. doi: 10.1067/mva.2001.112278.
9
Predicting the effect of carotid artery occlusion during carotid endarterectomy: comparing transcranial doppler measurements and cerebral angiography.预测颈动脉内膜切除术中颈动脉闭塞的影响:经颅多普勒测量与脑血管造影的比较。
Stroke. 1998 Oct;29(10):2038-42. doi: 10.1161/01.str.29.10.2038.
10
Transcranial Doppler monitoring during carotid endarterectomy: is it appropriate for selecting patients in need of a shunt?颈动脉内膜切除术期间的经颅多普勒监测:它适合用于选择需要分流的患者吗?
J Vasc Surg. 1997 Dec;26(6):973-9; discussion 979-80. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(97)70009-0.