Suppr超能文献

对“Cox迷宫手术与肺静脉隔离术治疗二尖瓣置换术后房颤的中期疗效比较:一项系统评价”的述评

Commentary to: "Comparing midterm outcomes" of Cox-Maze procedure and pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation after concomitant mitral valve surgery: A "systematic review".

作者信息

Moscarelli Marco, Fattouch Khalil

机构信息

Deparment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Maria Eleonora Hospital, GVM Care & Research, Palermo, Italy.

出版信息

J Card Surg. 2022 Nov;37(11):3811-3812. doi: 10.1111/jocs.16886. Epub 2022 Aug 30.

Abstract

There is no solid evidence from the literature that compare Cox-Maze with pulmonary vein isolation techniques for atrial fibrillation in the context of concomitant mitral valve surgery. Although the first is perhaps more effective and linked to higher freedom from atrial fibrillation, it is more invasive compared to the pulmonary isolation.

摘要

文献中没有确凿证据比较在二尖瓣手术背景下,Cox迷宫手术与肺静脉隔离技术治疗心房颤动的效果。虽然前者可能更有效,且与更高的房颤缓解率相关,但与肺静脉隔离相比,它的侵入性更强。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验