Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Xiangya Nursing School, Xiangya Research Center of Evidence-based Healthcare, Central South University, Hunan, China.
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Aug 1;5(8):e2229076. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.29076.
Investing in health care staffs' education can change the scope of action and improve care. The effectiveness of staff education remains inconclusive.
To examine whether an evidence-based educational intervention for nurses decreases the use of seclusion rooms in psychiatric hospitals compared with usual practice.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this pragmatic, 2-arm parallel, stratified cluster randomized clinical trial, 28 wards in 15 psychiatric hospitals in Finland were screened for eligibility and randomly allocated (1:1). Nurses joined on either intervention (n = 13) or usual practice (n = 15) wards. The intervention was performed from May 1, 2016, to October 31, 2017. The follow-up data for January 1 to December 31, 2017, were collected from hospital registers in 2018. Data analysis was performed October 27, 2021.
Evidence-based education delivered during 18 months, including 8 months of active education, followed by a 10-month maintenance period.
The primary outcome was the occurrence of patient seclusion (events per total number of patients).
Of 28 psychiatric hospital wards screened (437 beds and 648 nurses), 27 wards completed the study. A total of 8349 patients were receiving care in the study wards, with 53% male patients and a mean (SD) age of 40.6 (5.7) years. The overall number of seclusions was 1209 (14.5%) in 2015 and 1349 (16.5%) in 2017. In the intervention group, the occurrence rate of seclusion at the ward level decreased by 5.3% from 629 seclusions among 4163 patients (15.1%) to 585 seclusions among 4089 patients (14.3%) compared with a 34.7% increase from 580 seclusions among 4186 patients (13.9%) to 764 seclusions among 4092 patients (18.7%) in the usual practice group. The adjusted rate ratio was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.40-1.82) in 2015 and 0.66 (95% CI, 0.31-1.41) in 2017 (P = .003). However, the number of forced injections increased in the intervention group from 317 events among 4163 patients (7.6%) in 2015 to 486 events among 4089 patients (11.9%) in 2017 compared with an increase in the usual practice group from 414 events among 4186 patients (9.9%) in 2015 to 481 events among 4092 patients (11.8%) in 2017. Seven adverse events were reported.
In this randomized clinical trial, the educational intervention had a limited effect on the change of occurrence rate of patient seclusion, whereas the use of forced injections increased. More studies are needed to better understand the reasons for these findings.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02724748.
投资于医疗保健人员的教育可以改变行动范围并改善护理。员工教育的效果仍不确定。
研究一项针对护士的循证教育干预措施是否可以减少精神病院禁闭室的使用与常规做法相比。
设计、设置和参与者:这是一项务实的、2 臂平行、分层聚类随机临床试验,在芬兰的 15 家精神病院中筛选了 28 个病房以确定其是否符合条件,并进行随机分配(1:1)。护士加入干预(n=13)或常规实践(n=15)病房。干预于 2016 年 5 月 1 日至 2017 年 10 月 31 日进行。2018 年从医院登记处收集了 2017 年 1 月 1 日至 12 月 31 日的随访数据。数据分析于 2021 年 10 月 27 日进行。
为期 18 个月的循证教育,包括 8 个月的主动教育,随后是 10 个月的维持期。
主要结果是发生患者禁闭(每总患者人数的事件数)。
在筛选的 28 个精神病院病房(437 张床位和 648 名护士)中,有 27 个病房完成了研究。在研究病房中,共有 8349 名患者接受护理,其中 53%为男性患者,平均(SD)年龄为 40.6(5.7)岁。2015 年和 2017 年,禁闭总次数分别为 1209 次(14.5%)和 1349 次(16.5%)。在干预组中,与常规实践组相比,禁闭发生率从 4163 名患者中的 629 次禁闭(15.1%)降至 4089 名患者中的 585 次禁闭(14.3%),下降了 5.3%。而常规实践组中,从 4186 名患者中的 580 次禁闭(13.9%)增加到 4092 名患者中的 764 次禁闭(18.7%),增加了 34.7%。2015 年的调整后率比为 0.86(95%CI,0.40-1.82),2017 年为 0.66(95%CI,0.31-1.41)(P=0.003)。然而,与常规实践组相比,干预组的强制注射次数从 2015 年的 4163 名患者中的 317 次事件(7.6%)增加到 2017 年的 4089 名患者中的 486 次事件(11.9%),而常规实践组则从 4186 名患者中的 414 次事件(9.9%)增加到 4092 名患者中的 481 次事件(11.8%)。报告了 7 起不良事件。
在这项随机临床试验中,教育干预对禁闭发生率的变化影响有限,而强制注射的使用增加了。需要进一步的研究来更好地了解这些发现的原因。
ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT02724748。